题名

保母人員技能檢定應試者焦慮程度及其技能檢定結果之研究

并列篇名

A Study of the Outcomes of National Skill Testing on the Child Care Giver and Anxiety Degree

DOI

10.7042/JYDXTSXB.200412.0201

作者

黃美凰(Mei-Huang Huang);羅希哲(Shi-Jer Lou);唐潤洲(Jun-Chou Tang)

关键词

保母人員 ; 技能檢定 ; 焦慮程度 ; anxiety degree ; Child Care Giver ; skill testing

期刊名称

嘉義大學通識學報

卷期/出版年月

2期(2004 / 12 / 01)

页次

201 - 236

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

The purpose of this study is to investigate the outcomes of National skill testing for the Child Care Giver and the anxiety degree of those participating. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) which includes the State part and the Trait part was used to examine the degree of anxiety. 292 individuals participated in National skill testing for the child care giver in Ping-tung. SPSS 10.0 for Windows was used to analyze this data. The results are shown in below: 1. The average (SD) of the State part of STAI in pre-testing and testing period are separately 51.23(SD=11.20)and 55.85(SD=10.58). The average (SD) of the Trait part in pre-testing and testing period are separately 45.53(SD=8.89)and 45.75(SD=8.49)in the Department of Early Childhood Education (Two-Year university program) graduates. 2. There was a significant positive correlation between pre-testing and testing period scores in STAI in the Department of Early Childhood Education (Two-Year university program) graduates (P<.05). There was significant in the scores of the Trait part between people of different training backgrounds (P<.05). However, the scores of STAI in the testing period revealed a low negative correlation with the operating testing. 3. The average of the written testing is 88.91 while the average of the operating testing is 77.3. 81.5% of the subjects had passed through the National skill testing. There was a significant difference between the demographic data and the written testing (P<.05), while the training institutions affected the results of the operating tests (P<.05). The items of「cooking area」were different in contributing toward the Child Care Giver testing (P<.01). 4. The open question indicated that more practice in pre-testing is the key to conquer the anxiety and to pass the National skill testing for the Child Care Giver. People who want to take this testing need more practice in the skills of the「medicine area」 than the「playing area」. The results of this study may provide some effective strategies to the institutions related the Child Care Giver testing.

英文摘要

The purpose of this study is to investigate the outcomes of National skill testing for the Child Care Giver and the anxiety degree of those participating. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) which includes the State part and the Trait part was used to examine the degree of anxiety. 292 individuals participated in National skill testing for the child care giver in Ping-tung. SPSS 10.0 for Windows was used to analyze this data. The results are shown in below: 1. The average (SD) of the State part of STAI in pre-testing and testing period are separately 51.23(SD=11.20)and 55.85(SD=10.58). The average (SD) of the Trait part in pre-testing and testing period are separately 45.53(SD=8.89)and 45.75(SD=8.49)in the Department of Early Childhood Education (Two-Year university program) graduates. 2. There was a significant positive correlation between pre-testing and testing period scores in STAI in the Department of Early Childhood Education (Two-Year university program) graduates (P<.05). There was significant in the scores of the Trait part between people of different training backgrounds (P<.05). However, the scores of STAI in the testing period revealed a low negative correlation with the operating testing. 3. The average of the written testing is 88.91 while the average of the operating testing is 77.3. 81.5% of the subjects had passed through the National skill testing. There was a significant difference between the demographic data and the written testing (P<.05), while the training institutions affected the results of the operating tests (P<.05). The items of「cooking area」were different in contributing toward the Child Care Giver testing (P<.01). 4. The open question indicated that more practice in pre-testing is the key to conquer the anxiety and to pass the National skill testing for the Child Care Giver. People who want to take this testing need more practice in the skills of the「medicine area」 than the「playing area」. The results of this study may provide some effective strategies to the institutions related the Child Care Giver testing.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
社會科學 > 教育學
社會科學 > 社會學
参考文献
  1. 張美雲、鄭芳珠(2002)。保母家庭托育環境安全之探討-以台中市保母協會會員為例。醫護科技學刊,4(2),105-125。
    連結:
  2. 蘇美杏、李選、郭憲文(1999)。護生基技考試內在對話與考試焦慮關係之探討。弘光學報,34,99-126。
    連結:
  3. Cassady, J.C.,Johnson, R.E.(2002).Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance.Contemporary Educational Psychology,27,270-295.
  4. Cattell, R.B.,Scheier, I.H.(1961).The meaning and measurement of neuroticism and anxiety.New York:Ronald Press.
  5. Elliot, A.J.,McGregor, H.A(1999).Test anxiety and the hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation.Journal of Educational Psychology,76,628-644.
  6. Hembree, R(1988).Correlates, causes, and treatment of test anxiety.Review of Educational Research,58,47-77.
  7. Holloway, S. D.,Kagan, S. L.,Tsou, L.,Carroll, J(2001).Assessing child-care quality with a telephone interview.Early Childhood Reseach Quarterly,16,165-189.
  8. Lazarus, R. S(1993).From psychological stress to the emotion: A History of changing outlook.Annual Review of Psychology,44,1-21.
  9. Low, L(1989).Anxiety in a coronary care unit.Nursing Time,85(45),61-63.
  10. Nickle, J. T.,Brown, K. J.,Smith, B. A.(1990).Depression and anxiety among chronically ill heart patients: Age differences in risk and predictors.Research in Nursing & Health,13(2),87-97.
  11. Philipsen, L. C.,Burchinal, M. R.,Howes, C.,Cryer, D.(1997).The prediction of process quality from structures features of child care.Early Children Research Quarterly,12(3),281-303.
  12. Rosenthal, M. K(1990).Behaviors and beliefs of cargivers in family day care: The effects of back ground and work environment.Early Children Research Quarterly,6,263-283.
  13. Sagger, S.,Grant, J.,Woodhead, M.,Banham, V.(1994).The professionalisation of mothering: Family day care.Australian & New Zealand Journal of Sociology,30(3),273-287.
  14. Smith, A. P.,Endsley, R. C.(1996).Comparison of accredited and non-accredited family child care programs on program quality, provider professionalism, and family support.Child & Youth Care Forum,25(6),355-378.
  15. Spielberger, C. D. (Ed.)(1972).Anxiety: Current trends in theory and research.New York:Academic Press.
  16. Spielberger, C. D.,Gorsuch, R. L.,Lushene, R.,Vagg, P. R.,Jacobs, G. A.(1983).Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: STAI Form Y. Palo Alto.CA:Consulting Psychologists Press.
  17. Spielberger, C. D.,Gorsuch, R.L.,Lushene, R.E.(1970).Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Self-Evaluation Questionnaire).Palo Aoto, Cal.:Consulting Psychologists Press.
  18. Spielberger, C. D.,Sydeman, S. J.,Owen, A. E.,Marsh, B. J,M. E. Maruish (Ed.)(1999).The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment.New York:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  19. Williams, D. A.,Powers, I..Anxiety.Advancing Clinical Care.
  20. 技能檢定合格發證數按職類別分
  21. 臺灣地區婦女生活狀況調查提要報告
  22. 技能檢定合格發證數按職類別分
  23. 兒童人口結構
  24. 內政部兒童局。中華民國九十年臺閩地區兒童生活狀況調查報告。
  25. 王靜慧(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北,國立台北護理學院護理研究所。
  26. 技能檢定的開辦與目的
  27. 吳英璋、袁以雯(1982)。行為分析考驗焦慮評量表初步運用報告。測驗與輔導,55,913-916。
  28. 李盛祖。台北市教師性別角色態度調查研究。兩性平等教育季刊,2,85-89。
  29. 汪麗貞、林昭溶、邱書璇(1999)。八十八年德育醫管專校考區保母人員丙級技術士技能檢定結果調查研究。德育學報,15,207-219。
  30. 林美紀。影響基本護理技術表現因素之調查與實驗。美和專校學報,15,167-190。
  31. 邱華慧、李淑如、李宜賢(2001)。保母人員丙級技術士技能檢定術科試題分析及檢定結果相關因素之研究。醫護科技學刊,3(3),231-243。
  32. 邱麗(2002)。為「考試焦慮症」尋找出口!。張老師月刊,294,118-122。
  33. 邱麗文(2002)。為「考試焦慮症」尋找出口!。張老師月刊,294,118-122。
  34. 洪白瑾(1992)。開刀房護生實習前後壓力、焦慮、調適方法及其生理指標相關性研究。中台醫專學報,7,117-144。
  35. 洪敏中(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北,世新大學社會發展研究所。
  36. 胡倩瑜(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北,國立台北護理學院嬰幼兒保育研究所。
  37. 國立編譯館(2000)。教育大辭書。台北:文景。
  38. 張春興(1998)。張氏心理學辭典。
  39. 張碧如、蔡嫦娟(2002)。證照保母的職業認知與心理調適。朝陽科技大學論文集。
  40. 莊智芳(1993)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄,國立高雄師範大學教育研究所。
  41. 陳清香(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北,臺北醫學大學護理學研究所。
  42. 陳慶福(1989)。工專生特質焦慮、特質生氣之調查與實驗研究。國科會編號NH78-0138。
  43. 陳慶福、黃美凰(1993)。信念合理與焦慮、憂鬱的關係。輔導月刋,29(1、2),30-33。
  44. 曾文星、徐靜(1999)。現代精神醫學。台北:水牛。
  45. 黃美凰、羅希哲(2004)。屏東地區「保母人員技術士技能檢定訓練」之實施成效探討。美和技術學院學報,23(2),47-74。
  46. 楊庸一(2000)。輕型精神疾病的治療。當代醫學,27(10),826-828。
  47. 趙芳玫(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北,國立台北大學統計學系。
  48. 蔡嫦娟、張碧如(2003)。家長對家庭保母之選擇及關係之建立~兼談證照與非證照保母之比較。兒童福利期刊,4,133-155。
  49. 鄭珠里(1997)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北,國立台灣師範大學衛生教育系。
  50. 賴保禎(1995)。身心健康調查表。台北:中國行為科學社。
  51. 賴美信(1991)。中部某醫專情緒穩定型學生實習焦慮情緒調查研究。弘光護專學學報,19,21-66。
  52. 賴美信、張彩秀(1996)。賴張氏焦慮量表初步修訂報告-某醫專護三上期末考試焦慮狀況調查。弘光護專學報,26,81-117。
  53. 鍾思嘉、龍長風(1984)。修訂情境與特質焦慮量表之研究。中國測驗學會測驗年刊,21(1),27-36。
  54. 蘇麗智、郭憲文(1993)。某醫專護專實習壓力之評估-初期階段實習。護理研究,1(2),166-175。
被引用次数
  1. 曾勤閔、許有真(2010)。導入情緒因素之提示系統對使用者績效的影響。資訊管理學報,17(2),1-27。
  2. 羅希哲、鄭仁吉、黃美凰(2005)。電腦多媒體輔助學習對保母人員技能檢定成效之研究。高雄師大學報:教育與社會科學類,18,61-77。
  3. 歐淑儀、段慧瑩(2012)。居家式保母之嬰幼兒健康照護知能研究。人文社會科學研究,6(3),111-138。