由富勒人際交往的法理學論MGM v. Grokster案

A Critique of MGM v. Grokster Based on Fuller's Jurisprudence of Human Interaction

10.6199/NTULJ.2009.38.01.05

陳起行(Chi-Shing Chen)

富勒 ； 人際交往 ； 數位著作權 ； 點對點傳輸 ； 隱藏性法律 ； 調解 ； Lon Fuller ； human interaction ； digital copyright ； P2P ； implicit law ； mediation

臺大法學論叢

38卷1期（2009 / 03 / 01）

217 - 252

繁體中文

富勒是繼龐德之後出任哈佛法學院法理學教席的美國法理學家。不過，由於富勒的法理學以人際交往的社會理念作為基礎，雖然發展出眾多發人深省的法律理論，卻始終未能成為法理學研究的重點，甚至逐漸遠離法理學論述的焦點。這個現象在近幾年有了改變，深入探討富勒法理學的論著有增加的趨勢。本文認為，資訊科技所引發的法律典範移轉，似乎也正朝向富勒重視人際交往的法理學轉向。本文以涉及運用點對點傳輸技術侵害數位著作的Grokster案為中心，探討此一問題對法律所構成的挑戰，以及為何我們應當更加正視富勒重視人際交往的法理學，才能找到回應新興資訊科技法律問題之道。

After Roscoe Pound, Lon Fuller held the jurisprudence professorship at Harvard Law School. Fuller's sociological approach emphasizing human interaction is, however, not so welcomed in the jurisprudential world. It is believed that such trend may need a change. This paper discusses the Grosker case first, one that involves digital copyright infringement through the P2P model, and then advocates the need to take Fuller's human interaction conception of law seriously in order to response to the legal challenges brought forward by the information technologies.

1. 陳起行(2007)。美國數位著作保護的法理論述。臺大法學論叢，36(2)，131-164。
   連結：
2. (2006).Rhetorical Knowledge in Legal Practice and Critical Legal Theory.
3. Bix, B.,Jules Coleman (eds.),Scott Shapiro (eds.)(2002).Natural Law Theory: The Modern Tradition.The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law,61
4. Chen, C..Digital Copyright Law-Marking and the Future Development of E-government.
5. Cohen, J.(2006).Pervasively Distributed Copyright Enforcement.Geo. L. J.,95,1.
6. Cohen, J.(2002).Regulating Intimacy-A New Legal Paradigm.
7. Dworkin, R.(1965).Philosophy, Morality, and Law-Observations Prompted by Professor Fuller's Novel Claim.U. Pa. L. Rev.,113,668.
8. Dworkin, R.(1965).The Elusive Morality of Law.Vill. L. Rev.,10,631.
9. Eskridge & Frickey(1994).The Making of "The Legal Process".Harv. L. Rev.,107,2031.
10. Feldman & Nadler(2006).The Law and Norms of File Sharing.San Diego L. Rev.,577
11. Fuller, L.(1975).Law as an Instrument of Social Control and Law as a Facilitation of Human Interaction.BYU L. Rev.,1,89.
12. Fuller, L.(1972).The Justification of Legal Decisions.World Congress on Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy,6,77.
13. Fuller, L.(1958).Positivism and Fidelity to Law-A Reply to Professor Hart.Harv. L. Rev.,71,630.
14. Fuller, L.(1964).The Morality of Law.
15. Fuller, L.(1965).A Reply to Professors Cohen and Dworkin.Vill. L .Rev.,10,655.
16. Fuller, L.,Winston, K. (Ed.)(2001).The Case Against Freedom.Principles of Social Order,315
17. Fuller, L.,Winston, K. (Ed.)(2001).Irrigation and Tyranny.Principles of Social Order,207
18. Fuller, L.,Winston, K. (Ed.)(2001).Human Interaction and the Law.Principles of Social Order,231
19. Fuller, L.,Winston, K. (Ed.)(2001).Means and Ends.Principles of Social Order,61
20. Fuller, L.,Winston, K. (Ed.)(2000).Mediation-Its Forms and Function.The Principle of Social Order,144
21. Griswold, E.(1978).Lon Luvois Fuller,-1902 to 1978.Harv. L. Rev.,92,351.
22. Hart, H.L.A.(1958).Positivism and the Separation of law and Morals.Harv. L. Rev.,71,593-629.
23. Hart, H.L.A.(1965).Book Review: The Morality of Law by Lon Fuller.Harv. L. Rev.,78,1281.
24. Hart, H.L.A.(1961).The Concept of Law.
25. Herman & Gandy(2006).Catch1201:A Legislative History and Content Analysis of the DMCA Exemption Proceedings.Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal,24,121.
26. Houweiling, M.(2005).Distributive Values in Copyright.Tex. L. Rev.,83,1535.
27. Imfeld,E. K strand(2005).The Music Industry and the Legislative Development of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act's Online Service Provider Provision.Communication Law and Policy,10,291.
28. Ketchen, J.(2003).Revisiting Fuller's Critique of Hart-Managerial Control and the Pathology of Legal Systems: the Hart-Weber Nexus.Univ. of Toronto L. J.,53,1.
29. Lichtman & Posner(2006).Holding Internet Service Providers Accountable.S. Ct. Econ. Rev.,14,221.
30. Liedtke, M.(2005).Software Tool Goes After Net Copyright Threats.Marketing News(2005/04/15).
31. Litman, J.(2001).Digital Copyright: Protecting Intellectual Property on the Internet.
32. Litman, J.(1987).Copyright, Comprimise, and Legislative History.Cornell Law Review,72,857.
33. Lobel, O.(2004).The Renew Deal: The Fall of Regulation and the Rise of Governance in Contemporary Legal Thought.Minn, L. Rev.,89,342.
34. Mootz, F.,Witteveen & Burg (ed.)(1999).Natural Law and the Cultivation of Legal Rhetoric.Rediscovering Fuller.
35. Nicholson, P.(1974).The Internal Morality of Law: Fuller and His Critics.Ethics,84(4),307.
36. Nimmer, D.(2002).Appreciating Legislative History the Sweet and Sour Sports of the DMCA's Commentary.Cardozo L. Rev.,23,99.
37. Nimmer, D.(2003).Copyright Sacred Text, Technology, and the DMCA.
38. Postema, G.(1982).Coordination and Convention at the Foundations of Law.Journal of Legal Stiudies,11,165.
39. Postema, G.,Witteveen & Burg (ed.)(1999).Implicit Law, in Rediscovering Fuller.
40. Selznick, P.(1970).Book Review: Anatomy of Law.Harv. L. Rev.,83,1474.
41. Sturm, D.(1966).Lon Fuller's Multidimensional National Law Theory.Stanford Law Review,18(4),612-639.
42. Sturm, S.(2001).Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach.Columbia Law Review,101,458.
43. Summers, R.(1986).Book Review: Summer's Primer on Fuller's Jurisprudence-A Wholly Disinterested Assessment of the Reviews by Professors Wueste and Lobel.Cornell L. Rev.,71,1231.
44. Sunder, M.(2006).IP3.Stan, L. Rev.,59,257.
45. Urban & Quilter(2006).Efficient process or "Chilling Effects"?: Takedown Notices under section 512 of Digital Millennium Copyright Act.Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L. J.,22,621.
46. Winston, K.(1988).Is/Ought Redux: The Pragmatist Context of Lon Fuller's Conception of Law.Oxford Journal of Legal Studies,8,329-349.
47. Winston, K.(1988).Legislators and Liberty.Law and Philosophy,13,389.
48. Winston, K. (ed.)(2001).The Principle of Social Order, Selected Essays of Lon Fuller.
49. Witteveen & Burg (ed.)(1990).Rediscovering Fuller: Essays on Implicit Law and Institutional Design.
50. Wueste, D.(1986).Book Review: Fuller's Processual Philosophy of Law. Lon Fuller, by Robert Summers.Cornell L. Rev.,71,1205.
51. 陳起行(2002)。美國法理學發展概述1870-1970。政大法學評論，69，1-27。
52. 陳起行(2007)。由裁判理論的觀點析論United States v. American Library Association。政大法學評論，96，1-55。

1. (2011)。由柏拉圖政治家篇論德行法理學。政大法學評論，120，49-94。