题名

實證法與主觀價值：國際法典範下以人權為基礎之憲政功能行使

并列篇名

Positive Law and Subjective Values: The Administration of Constitutional Functions Based upon Human Rights under the Paradigm of International Law

DOI

10.6199/NTULJ.2010.39.03.07

作者

王自雄(Tzu-Hsiung Wang)

关键词

典範轉移 ； 方法論 ； 規範基礎 ； 價值 ； 人權 ； 國際憲政 ； paradigm shift ； normative foundation ； values ； human rights ； international constitutionalism

期刊名称

臺大法學論叢

卷期/出版年月

39卷3期（2010 / 09 / 01）

页次

325 - 368

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本文以傳統國際法理論所代表的「典範」為主軸，在簡要地描述其本質、特徵，以及由此而生的問題之後，以「典範轉移(paradigm shift)是否發生」作為分析國際法規範基礎是否發生改變的模型。在證明典範並未發生轉移之後，則嘗試透過既有的規範架構，提出國際法如何透過傳統典範的體現，來追求當代的目標。方法論上的修正，是在既有的規範框架與操作模式之下，拋開形式主義的束縛，進入規則背後的規範性表述與價值理念。並利用「國家同意」，作為調合「國家價值」與「個人價值」，以及「表述」與「實現」人權價值的工具。進而，在國內的民主憲政社會之外，可能形成一個以人權作為價值導引的憲政主義，以及一個透過人權行使憲政功能的國際社會。最後，則以相關結論以及對人與國家的重新思考，作為本文結語。
英文摘要

This essay used 'paradigm' to connote the traditional international theory. To begin, Part II and III described briefly the nature, characteristics and problems derived from traditional international theory. Then, Part IV used the model of 'paradigm shift' to analyze the possibility of international normative framework to shift its ground, and got a negative answer to the question. Be an alternative to it, and due to the necessity of pursuing contemporary aims under the vested paradigm, Part V demonstrated that it's possible to shake off formalism and delve into the normative values behind the rules. Meanwhile, States' consent may be a means to 'materialize' human rights values and 'harmonize' States' and individuals' values. To go a step further, Part VI brought up two propositions-human rights may lead to the status of international constitutionalism, and the international society may function constitutionally. The concluding remarks and the rethinking on individuals and States are the final.
主题分类 社會科學 > 法律學
参考文献
  1. Alston, P. (2002, December 2). Resisting the merger and acquisition of human rights by trade law: A reply to Petersmann. (Jean Monnet Working Paper of New York University School of Law). Retrieved August 19, 2010, from http://centers.law.nyu.edu/jeanmonnet/papers/02/021201.html.
  2. Ruggie, J. (2008). Protect, respect and remedy: a framework for business and human rights (Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, A/HRC/8/5). Retrieved August 19, 2010, from http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G08/128/61/PDF/G0812861.pdf?OpenElement
  3. U.N. Human Rights Council (2008), Protect, respect and remedy: A framework for business and human rights. Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises (A/HRC/8/5, prepared by John Ruggie). New York: U.N..
  4. Commission on the Responsibility of the Authors of the War and on Enforcement of Penalties (1919). Report presented to the preliminary peace conference. American Journal of International Law, 14(1), 95-154.
  5. Hershey, A. S. (1912). History of international law since the peace of Westphalia. American Journal of International Law, 6(1), 30-69.
  6. Petersmann, E.-U. (2001, July 1). Time for integration human rights into the law of worldwide organizations: lessons from European integration law for global integration law (Jean Monnet Working Paper of New York University School of Law). Retrieved August 19, 2010, from http://centers.law.nyu.edu/jeanmonnet/papers/01/012301.html.
  7. Hudson, M. O. (1928). The development of international law since the war. American Journal of International Law, 22(2), 330-350.
  8. International Law Commission (2003). Report of the fifty-fifth session (U.N. Doc.A/58/10)..
  9. Holland, T. E. (1898). Studies in international law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  10. Nys, E. (1911). The codification of international law. American Journal of International Law, 5(4), 871-900.
  11. Schwarzenberger, G. (1947). The inductive approach to international law. Harvard Law Review, 60(4), 539-570.
  12. Petersmann, E.-U.(2002a). Taking human dignity, poverty and empowerment of individuals more seriously: rejoinder to Alston (Jean Monnet Working Paper of New York University School of Law 12/02). Retrieved August 19, 2010, from http://centers.law.nyu.edu/jeanmonnet/papers/02/021201-03.pdf
  13. Ackerman, B.(1989).Constitutional politics/constitutional law.Yale Law Journal,99(3),453-547.
  14. Amerasinghe, C. F.(2008).Diplomatic protection.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  15. Barnett, M.(ed.),Duvall, R.(ed.)(2005).Power in global governance.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  16. Bloch, M.(1961).La société féodale.Paris:Albin Michel.
  17. Bühler, K. G.(2001).State succession and membership in international organization: Legal theories versus political pragmatism.The Hague:Kluwer Law International.
  18. Caflisch, L.(ed.)(1998).Règlement pacifique des différends entre États: perspectives universelle et Européenne.The Hague:Kluwer Law International.
  19. Cleveland, S. H.(2002).Human rights sanctions and international trade: A theory of compatibility.Journal of International Economic Law,5(1),133-189.
  20. Dworkin, R.(1977).Taking rights seriously.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
  21. Fuller, L. L.(1969).The morality of law.New Haven:Yale University Press.
  22. Gal-Or, N.(2008).The concept of appeal in international dispute settlement.European Journal of International Law,19(1),43-65.
  23. Gardbaum, S.(2008).Human rights as international constitutional rights.European Journal of International Law,19(4),749-768.
  24. Golding, M. P.(ed.),Edmundson, W. A.(ed.)(2005).The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of law and legal theory.Oxford:Blackwell Publishing.
  25. Hart, H. L. A.(1997).The concept of law.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  26. Hart, H. L. A.(1982).Essays on Bentham: Studies in jurisprudence and political theory.Oxford:Clarendon Press.
  27. Higgins, R.(1995).Problems and process: International law and how we use it.Oxford:Clarendon Press.
  28. Kelsen, H.(2003).Principles of international law.Clark, NJ:Lawbook Exchange.
  29. Kennedy, D.(2001).The forgotten politics of international governance.European Human Rights Law Review,6(2),117-125.
  30. Klabbers, J.(2009).An introduction to international institutional law.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  31. Knox, J. H.(2008).Horizontal human rights law.American Journal of International Law,102(1),1-47.
  32. Koh, H. H.(1997).Why do nations obey international law?.Yale Law Journal,106(8),2599-2659.
  33. Koskenniemi, M.(2005).From apology to utopia: The structure of international legal argument.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  34. Kramer, M. H.(2007).Objectivity and the rule of law.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  35. Ku, C.(ed.),Diehl, P. F.(ed.)(2003).International law: Classic and contemporary readings.London:Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  36. Kuhn, T. S.(1996).The structure of scientific revolutions.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
  37. Lauterpacht, H.(1955).Codification and development of international law.American Journal of International Law,49(1),16-43.
  38. Lauterpacht, H.(1950).International law and human rights.London:Stevens.
  39. Lincoln Y. S.,Guba, E. G.(1985).Naturalistic inquiry.Newbury Park, CA:Sage Publications.
  40. McCrudden, C.(2008).Human dignity and judicial interpretation of human rights.European Journal of International Law,19(4),655-724.
  41. Pauwelyn, J.(2003).Conflict of norms in public international law: How WTO law relates to other rules of international law.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  42. Peters, A.(2006).Compensatory constitutionalism: The function and potential of fundamental international norms and structures.Leiden Journal of International Law,19(3),579-610.
  43. Petersmann, E.-U.(2000).From 'negative' to positive 'integration' in the WTO: time for 'mainstreaming human rights' into WTO law?.Common Market Law Review,37(6),1363-1382.
  44. Petersmann, E.-U.(2002).Time for a United Nations 'global compact' for integrating human rights into the law of worldwide organizations: lessons from European integration.European Journal of International Law,13(3),621-650.
  45. Petersmann, E.-U.(2008).Human rights, international economic law and 'constitutional justice'.European Journal of International Law,19(4),769-798.
  46. Petersmann, E.-U.(1998).From the Hobbesian international law of co-existence to modern integration law: The WTO dispute settlement system.Journal of International Economic,1(2),175-198.
  47. Sereni, A. P.(1959).International economic institutions and the municipal law of states.Recueil des Cours,96,129-239.
  48. Shany, Y.(2004).The competing jurisdictions of international courts and tribunals.New York:Oxford University Press.
  49. Verdross, A.(1966).Jus dispositivum and jus cogens in international law.American Journal of International Law,60(1),55-63.
  50. Waldron, J.(1999).Law and disagreement.New York:Oxford University Press.
  51. Walter, C.(2001).Constitutionalizing (inter)national governance-possibilities for and limits to the development of an international constitutional law.German yearbook of international law (Jahrbuch für internationales recht),44,170-201.
  52. Wellens, K. C.(1994).Diversity in secondary rules and the unity of international law: Some reflections on current trends.Netherlands Yearbook of International Law,25,3-37.
  53. Wolfrum, R.(ed.),Röben, V.(ed.)(2005).Developments of international law in treaty making.Heidelberg, Germany:Springer.
  54. 葉俊榮(2003)。民主轉型與憲法變遷。台北=Taipei:元照=Angle。
  55. 鄧衍森(2006)。法治與人權。台北=Taipei:新學林=Sharing Culture。
被引用次数
  1. 王德瀛,王自雄(2020)。COVID-19與全球公衛治理－WHO的衰頹與新典範的崛起。科技法律透析，32(5)，51-71。
  2. 王自雄(2011)。人權於公平與公正待遇中的規範向度與效度：全球行政法方法論的建構。政治與社會哲學評論，38，141-200。
  3. 王自雄(2015)。條約衝突的類型、解釋、與制度性限制─國際投資仲裁之例。臺北大學法學論叢，94，209-292。
print cancel