题名

拉丁美洲在轉型正義上的困境與出路：以美洲人權法院的回應為中心

并列篇名

Dilemmas and Lessons of Transitional Justice in Latin America: Judicial Response of Inter-American Court of Human Rights

DOI

10.6199/NTULJ.2016.45.03.02

作者

李怡俐(Yi-Li Lee)

关键词

轉型正義 ； 人權侵害 ； 民主化 ； 國際人權 ； 美洲人權法院 ； transitional justice ； human rights violations ； democratization ； international human rights ； Inter-American Court of Human Rights

期刊名称

臺大法學論叢

卷期/出版年月

45卷3期（2016 / 09 / 01）

页次

827 - 909

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

在1980 年第三波民主化浪潮的影響下，拉丁美洲各國陸續從威權政體轉型成民主政體。在民主化的過程中，各國選擇不同轉型正義的制度，以回應過去軍事政府所涉及的人權侵害爭議。然而，部分轉型正義制度，如免除前威權/軍事政權人員刑事責任的特赦法，侵害了人權侵害案件中受害者的權利。在內國求助無門的情況下，透過人權團體的協助，各國受害者將其案件送交至美洲人權委員會和美洲人權法院。在此背景下，本文所要探討的是，美洲人權法院如何處理來自各締約國有關轉型正義的案件？美洲人權法院處理案件後，對內國帶來何種影響？促使美洲人權法院得以積極處理轉型正義案件的因素是什麼？本文認為美洲人權法院在處理有關轉型正義的案件上有三項特點：一是強調與擴張國家責任的範圍，二是明白宣示特赦法違反《美洲人權公約》，三是肯認受害者不僅享有司法救濟權，更有真相權的保障。在美洲人權法院作出相關判決後，不僅對拉丁美洲國家的法律與法院帶來正面的影響，也同時影響了其他國家及區域人權法院的判決。本文認為，促使美洲人權法院積極回應轉型正義的因素包括：美洲人權法院的獨立性與解釋權限的擴張、國際人權規範與機制的影響，以及內國與國際人權組織的動員。
英文摘要

Most new democratic governments in the Latin American region were required to deal with the human rights violations committed by past authoritarian/military regimes after shifts from war to peace or from an authoritarian regime to democracy. Numerous transitional justice mechanisms were adopted by these governments within the context of these transitions and post-conflict settings. The prevalence of impunity and the incapacity of judicial institutions, however, often impede the new administrations' capacity to tackle grave human rights violations such as torture, forced disappearance, extra-legal executions or murders. Hence, the victims and their families eventually bring their cases to the Inter-American Human Rights System to seek judicial resolutions. Against this background, this paper addresses the following three issues: (1) the ways in which the Inter-American Court of Human Rights deals with cases of genocide, forced disappearances, extra-judicial executions, and torture, (2) the impacts of these court decisions on the domestic government in Latin America and the countries in other regions, and (3) the factors that trigger the court to preside over such cases. This paper argues that there are three primary features produced by the court's decisions. The first feature is recognition and expansion of state responsibility. The second feature is domestic amnesty laws in violation of the American Convention on Human Rights. The third feature is guarantee of the right to remedy and right to truth for the victims. The decisions of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights have a huge impact on Latin American countries. Particularly, these decisions have triggered several domestic constitutional courts to invalidate existing amnesty laws. This paper argues that the independence and fairness of the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights and Inter-American Court of Human Rights, the influence of international human rights norms and the rise and mobilization of international human rights advocacy are the main factors that facilitate an active response by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights regarding cases of transitional justice.
主题分类 社會科學 > 法律學
参考文献
  1. 邱稔壤(1999)。皮諾契時代智利之人權爭議及其發展。問題與研究，38(4)，31-53。
    連結：
  2. 葉俊榮、張文貞(2006)。路徑相依或制度選擇？：論民主轉型與憲法變遷的模式。問題與研究，45(6)，1-31。
    連結：
  3. 蔡東杰(1999)。巴西在第三波民主化過程中的轉機與危機。問題與研究，38(11)，77-90。
    連結：
  4. Naqvi, Y. (2010). Amnesties and the ICC. Retrieved from http://www.peaceandjusticeinitiative.org/implementation-resources/amnesties-and-the-icc
  5. Mexico Agreement (April, 1991). Constitutional Reform: Chapultepec Peace Agreement. Retrieved from https://peaceaccords.nd.edu/provision/constitutional-reform-chapultepec-peace-agreement
  6. Shepherd, W. R. (1914). Latin America. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Library
  7. Abramovici, P. (2013, March 10). “Operation Condor” Latin America: The Thirty Years Dirty War. Global Research News. Retrieved from http://www.globalresearch.ca/operation-condor-latin-america-the-30-yearsdirty-war/5326022
  8. Adams, F.(2003).Deepening democracy: global governance and political reform in Latin America.Westport, CT:Praeger.
  9. Almqvist, J.(Ed.),Espósito, C. D.(Ed.)(2012).The role of courts in transitional justice : voices from Latin America and Spain.New York, NY:Routledge.
  10. Almqvist, J.(Ed.),Esposito, C.(Ed.)(2013).The Role of Courts in Transitional Justice: Voices from Latin America and Spain.New York, NY:Routledge.
  11. Alston, P.,Goodman, R.(2013).International human rights : the successor to International human rights in context.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
  12. Aucoin, L.(Ed.),Miller, L. E.(Ed.)(2010).Framing the state in times of transition: case studies in constitution making.Washington, DC:United States Institute of Peace.
  13. Barria, L. A.(Ed.),Roper, S. D.(Ed.)(2010).The development of institutions of human rights: a comparative study.New York, NY:Palgrave Macmillan.
  14. Basch, F. F.(2007).The doctrine of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights regarding states duty to punish human rights violations and its dangers.American University of International Law Review,23(1),195-229.
  15. Bassiouni, M. C.(2006).International recognition of victims' rights.Human Rights of Law Review,6(2)
  16. Bassiouni, M. C.(1996).International crimes: Jus Cogens and Obligatio Erga Omnes.Law and Contemporary Problems,59,63-74.
  17. Bassiouni, M. C.(1997).From Versailles to Rwanda in seventy-five years: the need to establish a permanent international criminal court.Harvard Human Rights Journal,10,11-62.
  18. Bassiouni, M. C.(Ed.)(2008).International criminal law Vol. I.: sources, subjects and contents.Leiden, Netherlands:Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  19. Binder, C.(2011).The Prohibition of amnesties by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.German Law Journal,12(5),1203-1230.
  20. Blair, D.(Ed.)(2013).Military engagement: influencing armed forces worldwide to support democratic transition: volume two: regional and country Studies.Washington, DC:Brookings Institution Press.
  21. Boraine, A. L.(2006).Transitional justice: a holistic interpretation.Journal of International Affairs,60(1),17-27.
  22. Brito, A. B. D.(Ed.),Enriquez, C. G.(Ed.),Aguilar, P.(Ed.)(2005).The politics of memory and democratization: transitional justice in democratizing societies.Oxford, England:Oxford University Press.
  23. Brito, A. B. D.(Ed.),Enriquez, C.G.(Ed.),Aguilar, P.(Ed.)(2005).The politics of memory and democratization: transitional justice in democratizing societies.Oxford, England:Oxford University Press.
  24. Brito, A. B. D.,Sznajder, M.(2010).The politics of the past: the Southern Cone and Southern Europe in comparative perspective.South European Society and Politics,15(3),487-505.
  25. Buergenthal, T.(1994).The United Nations truth commission for El Salvador.Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law,27(3),497-544.
  26. Buergenthal, T.(1982).The Inter-American Court of Human Rights.The American Journal of International Law,76(2),231-245.
  27. Burgorgue-Larsen L.,de Torres, A. U.,Greenstein, Rosalind(Trans.)(2011).The Inter-American Court of Human Rights: case law and commentary.Oxford, England:Oxford University Press.
  28. Calleros-Alarcón, J. C.(2008).The unfinished transition to democracy in Latin America.New York, NY:Routledge.
  29. Cardenas, S.(2010).Human rights in Latin America: a politics of terror and hope.Philadelphia, PA:University of Pennsylvania Press.
  30. Cavallaro, J.,Brewer, S. E.(2008).Reevaluating regional human rights litigation in twenty-first century: the case of the Inter-America Court.American Journal of International Law,102(4),768-827.
  31. Chetail, V.(Ed.)(2009).Post-conflict peacebuilding: a lexicon.Oxford, England:Oxford University Press.
  32. Chowdhury, A. R.(Ed.),Bhuiyan, J. H.(Ed.)(2010).An introduction to international human rights law.Leiden, Nederland:Brill.
  33. Colburn, F. D.(2002).Latin America at the end of politics.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
  34. Couso, J. A.(2011).Trying democracy in the shadow of an authoritarian legality: Chile's transition to democracy and Pinochet's constitution of 1980.Wisconsin International Law Journal,29(2),393-415.
  35. Crenzel, E.(2008).Argentina's National Commission on the Disappearance of Persons: Contributions to Transitional Justice.International Journal of Transitional Justice,2(2),173-191.
  36. Cueva, E. G.(2004).The contribution of the Peruvian Truth and Reconciliation Commission to prosecutions.Truth Commissions and Courts: the Tension between Criminal Justice and the Search for Truth,Dordrecht, Netherlands:
  37. Drucker, L.(1988).Recent Development: Governmental Liability for "Disappearances": a Landmark Ruling by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.Stanford Journal of International Law,25(1),289-322.
  38. Ensalaco, M.(2000).Chile under Pinochet: Recovering the truth.Philadelphia, PA:University of Pennsylvania Press.
  39. Ensalaco, M.(1994).Truth commissions for Chile and El Salvador: a report and assessment.Human Rights Quarterly,16(4),656-675.
  40. Filho, P. C.(2012).Truth Commission in Brazil: Individualizing Amnesty, Revealing the Truth.The Yale Review of International Studies,2(1),47-60.
  41. Foster, M.(2007).International refugee law and socio-economic rights refuge from deprivation.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  42. Gaddis, J. L.(2000).The United States and the origins of the Cold War, 1941-1947.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  43. Ginsburg, T.(Ed.),Simpser, A.(Ed.)(2013).Constitutions in authoritarian regimes.Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
  44. Gloppen, S.,Gargarella, R.,Skaar, E.(2004).Democratization and the judiciary: the accountability function of courts in new democracies.London, England:Frank Cass.
  45. Goldman, R. K.(2009).History and action: the Inter-American human rights system and the role of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights.Human Rights Quarterly,31(4),856-887.
  46. Goldstone, R. J.(1996).Justice as a tool for peace-making: truth commissions and international criminal tribunal.New York University Journal of International Law and Politics,28(3),485-504.
  47. Groome, D.(2011).The right to truth in the fight against impunity.Berkeley Journal of International Law,29(1),175-199.
  48. Grossman, C.(1992).Disappearances in Honduras: the need for direct victim representation in human rights litigation.Hastings International and Comparative Law Review,15,363-390.
  49. Grover, S. C.(2010).Prosecuting international crimes and human rights abuses committed against children: leading international court cases.Berlin, Germany:Springer-Verlag.
  50. Haas, M.(2008).International human rights: a comprehensive introduction.New York, NY:Routledge.
  51. Halliday, T. C.(Ed.),Shaffer, G.(Ed.)(2015).Transnational legal order.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  52. Halliday, T. C.(Ed.),Shaffer, G.(Ed.)(2015).Transnational legal order.Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
  53. Harris, David J.(Ed.),Livingstone, Stephen(Ed.)(1998).The Inter-American System of Human Rights.Oxford, England:Clarendon Press.
  54. Hayner, P. B.(1994).Fifteen truth commissions-1974 to 1994: a comparative study.Human Rights Quarterly,16(4),597-655.
  55. Heiss, C.,Navia, P.(2007).You win some, You lose some: constitutional reforms in Chile's transition to democracy.Latin American Politics and Society,49(3),163-190.
  56. Helmke, G.(Ed.),Rios-Figueroa, J.(Ed.)(2011).Courts in Latin America.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  57. Helmke, G.(Ed.),Rios-Figueroa, J.(Ed.)(2011).Courts in Latin America.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  58. Human Rights Watch(1994).Honduras: the facts speak for themselves: the preliminary report of the national commissioner for the protection of human rights in Honduras.United States:Human Rights Watch.
  59. Huneeus, A.(2011).Courts resisting courts: lessons from the Inter-American Court's struggle to enforce human rights.Cornell International Law Journal,44,493-533.
  60. Huntington, S. P.(1991).The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century.Norman, OK:University of Oklahoma Press.
  61. Huntington, Smauel P.、劉軍寧譯(2008)。第三波：二十世紀末的民主化浪潮。臺北:五南出版社。
  62. Huyse, L.(1995).Justice after transition: on the choices successor elites make in dealing with the past.Law and Social Inquiry,20(1),51-78.
  63. Isa, F. G.(Ed.),Feyter, K. d.(Ed.)(2009).International human rights law in a global context.Bilbao, Spain:University of Deusto.
  64. Jeffery, R.(2014).Amnesties, accountability, and human rights.Philadelphia, PA:University of Pennsylvania Press.
  65. Karl, T. L.(1990).Dilemmas of democratization in Latin America.Comparative Politics,23(1)
  66. Kaye, M.(1997).The role of truth commissions in the search for Justice, Reconciliation and Democratisation: The Salvadorean and Honduran Cases.Journal of Latin American Studies,29(3),693-716.
  67. Keck, M.,Sikkink, K.(1998).Activists beyond borders: advocacy networks in international politics.Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.
  68. Kok, R. A.(2007).Statutory limitations in international Criminal Law.West Nyack, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  69. Kritz, N. J.(Ed.)(1995).Transitional Justice: How emerging democracies reckon with former regimes. Vol. 1: general considerations.Washington, DC:United States Institute of Peace Press.
  70. Lan, Jan-Erik、Svante, Ersson、何景榮譯(2002)。新制度主義政治學。臺北:韋伯。
  71. Leffler, M. P.(1994).The specter of communism: The United States and the origins of the Cold War, 1917-1953.New York, NY:Hill and Wang.
  72. Lessa, F.,Olsen, T. D.,Payne, L. A.,Pereira, G.,Reiter, A. G.(2014).Overcoming impunity: pathways to accountability in Latin America.International Journal of Transitional Justice,8(1),75-98.
  73. Linz, J. J.(1978).The Breakdown of democratic regimes: crisis, breakdown & reequilibration.Baltimore, MD:Johns Hopkins University Press.
  74. Linz, J. J.,Stepan, A.(1996).Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe.Baltimore, MD:Johns Hopkins University Press.
  75. Lixinski, L.(2010).Treaty interpretation by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: expansionism at the service of the unity of international law.European Journal International Law,21(3),585-604.
  76. Lysaght, C.(1983).Conference: The Scope of protocol II and its relation to common article 3 of the Geneva conventions of 1949 and other human rights instruments.American University of Law Review,33(1),9-28.
  77. McAdams, A.J.(Ed.)(1997).Transitional justice and the rule of law in new democracies.Notre Dame, IN:University of Notre Dame Press.
  78. McSherry, J. P.(1999).Operation Condor: clandestine Inter-American System.Social Justice,26(4),144-174.
  79. McSherry, J. P.(1992).Military Power, Impunity and State-Society Change in Latin America.Canadian Journal of Poliitical Science,25(3),463-488.
  80. McSherry, J. P.,Mejía, R. M.(1999).Introduction to shadows of state terrorism: impunity in Latin America.Social Justice,26(4),1-12.
  81. Medina, C.(1990).The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: reflections on a joint venture.Human Rights Quarterly,12(4),439-464.
  82. Melo, C. de C.(2009).Transitional Justice in South America: The Role of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.Revista CEJIL,5
  83. Melo, M. A.(2009).Strong presidents, robust democracies? Separation of powers and rule of law in Latin America.Brazilian Political Science Review,3(2),30-59.
  84. Méndez, J. E.,Mariezcurrena, J.(1999).Accountability for past human rights violations: contributions of the Inter-American organs of protection.Social Justice,26(4),84-106.
  85. Munck, G. L.,Leff, C. S.(1997).Modes of transition and democratization: South America and Eastern Europe in Comparative Perspective.Comparative Politics,29(3),343-362.
  86. Neuman, G. L.(2008).Import, export, and regional consent in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.The European Journal of International Law,19(1),101-123.
  87. Nino, C. S.(1996).Radical evil on trial.New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
  88. Nolte, D.(2008).Constitutional change in Latin America: power politics or symbolic politics?.ECPR Joint Session of Workshops,Rennes:
  89. Nolte, D.(Ed.),Schilling-Vacaflor, A.(Ed.)(2012).New constitutionalism in Latin America: promises and practices.New York, NY:Ashgate Publishing.
  90. Nowak, M.(2012).The implementation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.Taiwan Human Rights Journal,1(2),79-117.
  91. Ntoubandi, F. Z.(2007).Amnesty for crimes against humanity under international law.Leiden, Netherlands:Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  92. Olsen, T. D.,Payne, L. A.,Reiter, A. G.(2010).Transitional justice in balance: comparing processes, weighing efficacy.Washington, DC:Institute of Peace Press.
  93. O'Shea, A.(2002).Amnesty for crime in international law and practice.New York, NY:Kluwer Law International.
  94. Pasqualucci, J. M.(2013).The practice and procedure of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
  95. Peeler, J.(2009).Building democracy in Latin America.Boulder, CO:Lynne Rienner Publisher.
  96. Pion-Berlin, D.(2005).Review: authoritarian legacies and their impact on Latin America.Latin American Politics and Society,47(2),159-170.
  97. Pion-Berlin, D.(1994).To prosecute or to pardon? Human rights decisions in the Latin American Southern Cone.Human Rights Quarterly,16(1),105-130.
  98. Ratner, S. R.,Abrams, J. S.,Bischoff, J. L.(2009).Accountability for human rights atrocities in international law: beyond the Nuremberg legacy.Oxford, England:Oxford University Press.
  99. Roehrig, T.(2002).The prosecution of former military leaders in newly democratic nations: the cases of Argentina, Greece, and South Korea.Jefferson, NC:McFarland & Company.
  100. Roht-Arriaza, N.(1998).Truth commissions and amnesties in Latin America: the second generation.Proceedings of the Annual Meeting,92,313-316.
  101. Roht-Arriaza, N.(2004).Reparations decisions and dilemmas.Hastings International and Comparative Law Review,27,157-219.
  102. Roht-Arriaza, N.(1990).State responsibility to investigate and prosecute grave human rights violations in international law.California Law Review,78(2),449-513.
  103. Roht-Arriaza, N.,Gibson, L.(1998).The Developing Jurisprudence on Amnesty.Human Rights Quarterly,20(4),843-885.
  104. Roniger, L.,Sznajder, M.(1999).The legacy of human rights violations in the Southern Cone: Argentina, Chile and Uruguay.Oxford, England:Oxford University Press.
  105. Root, R. K.(2012).Transitional justice in Peru.New York, NY:Palgrave Macmillan.
  106. Rotberg, R. I.(Ed.),Thompson, D.(Ed.)(2000).Truth v. justice: the morality of truth commissions.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
  107. Shelton, D.(Ed.)(2013).The Oxford handbook of international human rights law.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
  108. Sikkink, K.(2011).The justice cascade: how human rights prosecutions are changing world politics.New York, NY:W. W. Norton & Company.
  109. Skaar, E.(2011).Judicial independence and human rights in Latin America: violations, politics, and prosecution.New York, NY:Palgrave Macmillan.
  110. Smith, A.(2004).Sierra Leone: the interaction of law, policy, and practice.Internationalized criminal courts and tribunals: Sierra Leone, East Timor, Kosovo, and Cambodia,New York, NY:
  111. Smith, R. K. M.(2010).Textbook on international human rights law.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
  112. Solla, M. F. P.(2006).Enforced disappearances in international human rights.Jefferson, NC:McFarland.
  113. Stan, L.(Ed.),Nedelsky, N.(Ed.)(2013).Encyclopedia of transitional justice.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  114. Sunshine, C. A.(Ed.)(2007).Victims Unsilenced: The Inter-American Human Rights System and Transitional Justice in Latin America.Washington, DC:Due Process of Law Foundation.
  115. Tang, Y. S.(2015).International justice through domestic courts: challenges in Brazil's judicial review of the amnesty law.International Journal of Transitional Justice,9(2),259-277.
  116. Teitel, R. G.(2014).Globalizing transitional justice: contemporary essays.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
  117. Teitel, R. G.(2000).Transitional justice.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
  118. Teitel, R. G.(2013).Humanity's law.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
  119. Teitel, R. G.(2003).Transitional justice genealogy.Harvard Human Rights Journal,16,69-94.
  120. The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights(2006).Rule of law tools for post-conflict states: amnesties.New York, NY:United Nations.
  121. Tinta, M. F.(2008).The landmark rulings of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on the rights of the child: protecting the most vulnerable at the edge.Leiden, Netherlands:Martinus Nijhoff.
  122. Tyagi, Y.(2011).The UN Human Rights Committee: practice and procedure.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  123. USA International Business Publications(2013).Argentina constitution and citizenship laws handbook: strategic information and basic laws.Washington, DC:International Business Publications USA..
  124. Vasallo, M.(2002).Truth and reconciliation commissions: general considerations and a critical comparison of the commissions of Chile and El Salvador.University of Miami International American Law Review,33(1),153-182.
  125. Wright, T. C.(2007).State terrorism in Latin America: Chile, Argentina, and international human rights.Lanham, MA:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  126. Wright, T. C.(2014).Impunity, human rights, and democracy: Chile and Argentina, 1990-2005.Austin, TX:University of Texas Press.
  127. 王建勛(1981)。中南美洲政治論叢。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。
  128. 田弘茂編、朱雲漢編(1997)。新興民主的機遇與挑戰。臺北:業強出版社。
  129. 田弘茂編、朱雲漢編、Diamond, Larryed.、Plattner, Marced.(1997)。鞏固第三波民主。臺北:業強出版社。
  130. 向駿編(2004)。拉丁美洲軍人政權之回顧與前瞻。臺北:韋伯。
  131. 吳乃德(2006)。轉型正義和歷史記憶：臺灣民主化的未竟之業。思想雜誌，2，1-34。
  132. 李怡俐(2016)。當代轉型正義的制度與規範脈絡：兼論南韓與臺灣的經驗比較。臺北:元照。
  133. 林鈺雄編、顏厥安編(2008)。人權之跨國性司法實踐：歐洲人權裁判研究（二）。臺北:元照。
  134. 姜皇池(2006)。國際公法導論。臺北:新學林出版社。
  135. 張文貞(2012)。演進中的法：一般性意見作為國際人權公約的權威解釋。臺灣人權學刊，1(2)，25-43。
  136. 張文貞(2010)。國際人權法與內國憲法的匯流：台灣施行兩大人權公約之後。台灣人權促進會季刊，春季號，12-22。
  137. 張文貞、呂尚雲(2011)。兩公約與環境人權的主張。臺灣人權學刊，1(1)，69-102。
  138. 陳弘毅(2001)。從「皮諾切特案」看國際刑法和國際人權法的發展。人文及社會科學集刊，13(5)，575-603。
  139. 陳隆志編、黃昭元編、李明峻編、廖福特編(2006)。國際人權法：文獻選集與解說。臺北:前衛。
  140. 黃昭元(2015)。公民與政治權利國際公約與憲法解釋。司法院大法官104 年度學術研討會，臺北:
  141. 廖福特(2003)。歐洲人權法。臺北:學林。
  142. 蔡東杰(2003)。民主化運動與憲政改革：巴西與墨西哥之比較研究。全球政治評論，3，115-130。
  143. 蔡東杰(1997)。民主化理論的釐清與重構：以拉丁美洲為例。問題與研究，36(8)，67-80。
被引用次数
  1. 陳毅峰,余崇維(2019)。從關係性論述探究轉型正義中的原住民族傳統領域議題。台灣社會研究季刊，114，57-103。
  2. 翁燕菁(2020)。性別與暴力：美洲人權法院對中美洲「殺女」論述之回應。台灣國際法學刊，16(2)，85-118。
print cancel