論WTO反傾銷制度下「非市場經濟體」待遇之內涵與適用

The Content and Application of NME Treatment under WTO Agreement

10.6199/NTULJ.2017.46.01.04

薛景文(Ching-Wen Hsueh)

非市場經濟體待遇 ； 正常價值 ； 替代第三國模式 ； 反傾銷 ； 中國入會議定書第15條 ； NME Treatment ； Normal Value ； Surrogate Country ； Anti-Dumping ； Article 15 of China's Accession Protocol

臺大法學論叢

46卷1期（2017 / 03 / 01）

201 - 267

繁體中文

共產國家的國內市場受到政府干預或操縱，並不受市場法則控制，其國內市場的正常價值（Normal Value）是否足以成為認定傾銷差額的基準或有疑問。因此WTO容許會員在對此種非市場經濟體國家的廠商進行反傾銷調查時，不採其國內市場資料，而形成特殊待遇。然而非市場經濟體待遇之形成有其特殊的歷史與經濟背景，今日共產經濟制度國家紛紛轉型，與非市場經濟體待遇的原始預設有所出入，針對基於經濟體制差異所生的特殊待遇之內涵及其正當性，有進一步研究的必要。本文第一部分將討論非市場經濟體特殊待遇的起源，以及其與市場經濟體區別的法律基礎，並探討該等區別待遇的必要性與正當性；本文第二部分將進一步透過相關條約解釋，並參諸相關條約之內容、目的以及實務上運作，探尋非市場經濟體地位之判斷標準；第三部分將討論非市場經濟體國家國內「正常價值」之認定方式，探求在法律上如何還原所謂「失真」的正常價值；最後，本文將總結非市場經濟體待遇的內涵，檢視目前國際上慣行的「替代第三國模式」是否合理，並提出適用上可能產生的問題。

The domestic markets of communist courtiers were controlled by the governments and do not play by the rules of market. Therefore, it is questionable whether the investing authorities still have to take the domestic normal value as the basis for comparison. The WTO anti-dumping rules allow the members to exclude, under certain conditions, the relevant information in these NMEs from the determination of dumping. In other words, the NME are subject to the special treatment that deviates from the general principles of anti-dumping rules. However the legitimacy of NME treatment should not be presumed. This article addressed the content of the NME treatment and how to apply the NME treatment properly. In section I, the origin of the NME treatment is elaborated and legitimacy and necessity of such treatment is analyzed. Section II tried to discover the criteria of the NME status, which were never clearly provided in the WTO anti-dumping rules, by referring to the relevant provisions, objects and purposes of the anti-dumping rules, and the practices of the members. Section III focused on the methodologies to determine the normal value in NME. By virtue of the findings in the previous sections, the ＂surrogate mode＂, which is the most widely adopted methodology to determine the normal value in NME, is the be reviewed in the last section.

1. Suranovic, Steve M. (2010). International Trade and Policy: The Theory of Comparative Advantages. Retrieved from http://internationalecon.com/Trade/Tch40/T40-0.php
2. Viner, J. (1923). Dumping: A Problem in International Trade. New York, NY: A. M. Kelley.
3. O'Connor, B. (2014). The Myth of China and Market Economy Status in 2016. International Economic Law and Policy Blog. Retrieved from http://worldtradelaw.typepad.com/files/oconnorresponse.pdf
4. Andersen, H.(2009).EU Dumping Determinations and WTO Law.New York, NY:Kluwer Law International.
5. Antonini, R.,Monard, E.(2011).The Concurrent Imposition of Anti-dumping and Countervailing Measures on Non-Market Economies: Time for a Clean Sheet of (Chinese) Paper Approach?.International Trade law and Regulation,17,87-96.
6. Barshefsky, C.(1990).Non-Market Economies in Transition and the U.S. Anti-dumping law: Remarks on the Need for Reevaluation.Boston University International Law Journal,8,363-372.
7. Beseler, J. F.,Williams, A.N.(1986).Anti-dumping and Anti-subsidy Law: The European Communities.London, England:Sweet and Maxwell.
8. Butler,W.(1987).The Role of The Nonmarket Economies in the New Round of Trade Negotiations.American Society of International Law,81,224-238.
9. Cornelis, J.(2007).China's Quest for Market Economy Status and its Impact on the Use of Trade Remedies by the European Communities and the United States.Global Trade and Customs Journal,2,105-115.
10. Dam, K.(1970).The GATT-Law and International Economic Organization.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
11. Denton, R.(1987).The Non-Market Economy Rules of European Community's Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duties Legislation.The International and Comparative Law Quarterly,36,198-239.
12. Detlof, H.,Fridh, H.(2007).The EU Treatment of Non-Market Economy Countries in Anti-Dumping Proceedings.Global Trade and Customs Journal,2,265-281.
13. GATT(1995).GATT Analytical Index: Guide to GATT Law and Practice.Geneva, Switzerland:World Trade Organization.
14. Grzybowski, K.(1980).Socialist Countries in GATT.American Journal of Comparative Law,28(4),539-554.
15. Horlick, G. N.,Schuman, S. S.(1984).Nonmarket Economy Trade and U.S. Antidumping Countervailing Duty Law.The International Lawyer,18(4),807-840.
16. Ianni, E. M.(1983).State Trading: Its Nature and International Treatment.Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business,5,46-64.
17. Jackson, J.(1977).Legal Problems of International Economic Relations.St. Paul, Minn:West Publishing Co.
18. Jackson, J. H.(1989).State Trading and Nonmarket Economies.The International Lawyer,23,891-908.
19. Jackson, J.,Davey, W. J.,Sykes, A. O.(2002).Legal Problems of International Economic Relations 8.St. Paul, Minn:West Publishing Co.
20. Kabik, M.(1992).The Dilemma of "Dumping" from Nonmarket Economy Countries.Emory International Law Review,6,339-448.
21. Kostecki, M. M.(1979).East-West Trade and the GATT System.London, England:Palgrave Macmillan.
22. Laroski, Joseph A., Jr.(1999).NMEs: A Love Story-Nonmarket and Market Economy Status Under US Antidumping Law.Law and Policy Internatonal Business,30,369.
23. Lester, S.,Mercurio, B.,Davies, A.(2008).World Trade Law: Text Materials and Commentary.Oxford, England:Hart Publishing.
24. Mavoroidis, Petros C.(2008).No Outscouring of Law? WTO Law as Practiced by WTO Courts.The American Journal of International Law,102,421-474.
25. Mayer,Brown,Rowe,Maw, LLP.(2005).,未出版
26. Polouektov, A.(2002).Non-Market Economy Issues in the WTO Anti-Dumping Law and Accession Negotiations: Revival of a Two-tier Membership?.Journal of World Trade,36(1),1-37.
27. Schwartz, Warren F.,Happer, Jr.,Eugene, W.(1972).The Regulation of Subsidies Affecting International Trade.The Michigan Law Review Association,70,831-858.
28. Sinclair, S. I.(1984).The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.Dover, NH:Manchester University Press.
29. Snyder, F.(2001).The Origins of the "Nonmarket Economy": Ideas, Pluralism & Power in EC Anti-dumping Law about China.European Law Journal,7(4),369-424.
30. Sohn, C.(2005).Treatment of non-market economy countries under the World Trade Organization anti-dumping regime.Journal of World Trade,39,763-786.
31. Tietje, C.,Nowrot, K.(2011).Myth or Reality? China's Market Economy Status under WTO Anti-Dumping Law after 2016.Policy Papers on Transnational Economic Law,34,1-12.
32. Watson, K. W.(2014).Will Nonmarket Economy Methodology Go Quietly to the Night? U.S. Anti-dumping Policy toward China after 2016.Policy Analysis,763
33. Yu, Y.(2013).Rethinking China's Market Economy Status in Trade Remedy Dispute after 2016: Concerns and Challenges.Asian journal of WTO & international health law and policy,8(1),77-113.
34. Yuanxiang, H.(1991).Legal and Policy Issues of the Trade and Economic Relations between China and the EEC: A Comparative Study.Boston, MA:Kluwer Law and Taxation.
35. Zhang, Y.(2010).The Link between Countervailing Duty Investigations and Non-Market Economy Status in Light of United States: Definitive Anti-dumping and Countervailing Duties on Certain Products from China.International Trade Law Journal,19,13-24.
36. 林彩瑜(2013)。WTO 制度與實務：世界貿組織法律研究（三）。臺北:元照。
37. 羅昌發(2010)。國際貿易法。臺北:元照。
38. 羅昌發(1994)。美國貿易救濟制度：國際經貿法律研究（一）。臺北:元照。