公司法制的數位化及COVID-19的挑戰：以股東會機制的演化為中心

Digitalization of Corporate Law post the COVID-19 pandemic: The Evolution of Corporate Meetings

10.6199/NTULJ.202111/SP_50.0003

陳肇鴻(Chao-Hung Chen)

公司法 ； 股東會 ； 董事會 ； 遠距會議 ； 視訊會議 ； 電子投票 ； 股東權 ； 資訊科技 ； Corporate law ； general meeting ； board meeting ； remote meeting ； virtual meeting ； electronic voting ； shareholder rights ； information technology

臺大法學論叢

50卷S期（2021 / 11 / 01）

1239 - 1301

繁體中文

本文旨在探討資訊科技的進步以及COVID-19疫情的催化下，遠距公司會議（特別著重於股東會）於公司法制上的發展及未來方向。資訊科技的發展會對市場實務運作及市場參與者的行為造成影響，最終可能導致法律機制的演化與發展，於制度設計上應有足夠的彈性來因應市場環境的變化。股東會傳統上係以實體會議的方式來集會並透過決議來進行意思表示的決定，但隨科技的發展，世界各國對遠距方式進行股東會的接受方式不一，但在疫情催化下，於不同程度內會常鼓勵遠距股東會。在疫情過去之後，本文以為，就公開化程度較高的公司，主管機關及立法者應考量如何利用遠距會議的方式來強化股東會集會及討論的實質功能，以利提升一般股東對股東會的積極參與以強化股東權的行使；考量到科技使用仍然在發展中，本文建議立法者可考慮容許以併存或混合式的方式以實體及遠距的方式來召開股東會。簡言之，主管機關可採取更開明的思維來開放科技於公司機會議的採用，以彈性的方式來漸進式地調整法律機制，以透過市場機制來促使公司選擇最有效率召開股東會的機制。若此，則科技的進步，透過疫情的催化及實務上的試驗，最終可能成為影響公司法制往數位化發展的動力。

This article examines the evolution of corporate meetings (including shareholders' and board meetings) alongside the development of information technology amid the global COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on general meetings. The development of information and communication technology in the past three decades has greatly improved ways to convene a corporate meeting. It may result in changes to market environment and people's behaviours, eventually causing evolution of legal institutions. Traditionally, corporate meetings have to be convened physically in a face-to-face fashion. Several countries have allowed electronic general meetings to some extent pre-pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic becomes a catalyst for more popular use of electronic general meetings to reduce public gatherings at least as a temporary measure. Post the pandemic, this article proposes that Taiwan law should open more room for public companies to use electronic methods to convene a general meeting. There are still technical issues to be resolved such as cyber risk, identity verification and real-time voting. But those issues should not be an obstacle for electronic meetings, since many listed companies in Taiwan already allow shareholders to vote electronically in advance via the platform operated by the custodian services. In addition, electronic meetings should improve shareholders participation (especially for individual investors) and promote better shareholders' power to shape the will of a company. Allowing greater use of electronic meetings should also strengthen the function of general meetings as a venue for shareholders to convene and discuss before a decision. Instead of allowing companies to use electronic meetings as an exclusive way to convene a general meeting, regulators can consider hybrid meetings to accommodate the benefits of both physical and electronic meetings while developing better technological solutions for strong verification and real-time voting systems. In the end, the market will decide which method is most efficient and determine the force of institutional evolution in corporate law triggered by technological development facilitated by the global pandemic.

1. Jones Day, Insights (2020, April). California Issues Executive Order Facilitating Virtual Shareholder Meetings. https://www.jonesday.com/en/insights/2020/04/virtual-shareholder-meetings-in-california
2. Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority. (2020). Guidance on the Conduct of General Meetings Amid Evolving COVID-19 Situation. https://www.mas.gov.sg/-/media/MAS/News/MediaReleases/2020/Guidance-on-the-Conduct-of-General-Meetings.pdf?la=en&hash=DAFABCC958B1752BA99BA2354BAAE64FE1F0F003
3. Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority. (2021). Further Extension of Duration of Alternative Arrangements for Conduct of Meetings. https://www.acra.gov.sg/announcements/acra's-support-measures-and-guidance-for-businesses-during-covid-19
4. Albano, M., Flow, S., Kohn, A. H., Odell, F. L., & Grannis, H. K. (2020, April 20). UPDATE: Cuomo Executive Order Gives New York Corporations Relief on Physical Annual Meetings. Cleary M&A and Corporate Governance Watch. https://www.clearymawatch.com/2020/04/cuomo-executive-order-gives-new-york-corporations-relief-on-physical-annual-meetings/
5. Australian Securities and Investments Commission. (2021, March 29). Guidelines for Investor Meetings Using Virtual Technology. https://asic.gov.au/about-asic/news-centre/news-items/asic-guidelines-for-investor-meetings-using-virtual-technology/#
6. Bird & Bird. (2020). Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the 2020 AGM Season. https://www.twobirds.com/~/media/pdfs/in-focus/coronavirus/impact-of-the-covid-19-pandemic-on-the-2020-agm-season.pdf?la=en&hash=96DA3B3C2A854082060714D428826E38B32D0BD0
7. Chartered Governance Institute UK & Ireland. (2020). Shareholder Meetings Under the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020. https://www.cgi.org.uk/knowledge/resources/share-meet-insolvency-govact2020
8. Chen, C.(2019).A One-Size-Fits-All Approach to Corporate Governance Codes and Compliance by Smaller Listed Firms: An Examination of Companies Listed in Hong Kong and Singapore.Berkeley Business Law Journal,15(2),337-364.
9. Gao, S.,Chen, C.(2017).Transnationalism and Financial Regulation Change: A Case Study of Derivatives Markets.European Business Organization Law Review,18,193-223.
10. Gurrea-Martínez, A.,Remolina, N.(2019).The Law and Finance of Initial Coin Offerings.Cryptoassets: Legal, Regulatory and Monetary Perspectives
11. Harvey, C. R.,Ramachandran, A.,Santoro, J.(2021).DeFi and the Future of Finance.John Wiley & Sons.
12. Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission. (2020, April 1). Joint Statement in Relation to General Meetings in Light of the Prevention and Control of Disease (Prohibition on Group Gathering) Regulation. https://www.sfc.hk/en/News-and-announcements/Policy-statements-and-announcements/Joint-Statement-in-relation-to-General-Meetings-in-light-of-the-Prevention-and-Control-of-Disease
13. Lin, T. C. W.(2017).The New Market Manipulation.Emory Law Journal,66(6),1253-1314.
14. Mahoney, J.,Thelen, K.(2009).A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change.Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power
15. Maume, P.,Fromberger, M.(2019).Regulation of Initial Coin Offerings: Reconciling U.S. and E.U. Securities Laws.Chicago Journal of International Law,19(2),548-585.
16. Ministry of Finance. (2011, June). Consultation Paper: Report of the Sreering Committee for Review of the Companies Act. https://www.mof.gov.sg/docs/default-source/default-document-library/news-and-publications/press-releases/annex-a-sc-report-complete-2.pdf
17. Nelson, R. R.,Winter, S. G.(1985).An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.Harvard University Press.
18. North, D. C.,Wallis, J. J.(1994).Integrating Institutional Change and Technical Change in Economic History: A Transaction Cost Approach.Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics,150(4),609-624.
19. OECD. (2018). The Potential for Blockchain Technology in Public Equity Markets in Asia. https://www.oecd.org/daf/ca/The-Potential-for-Blockchain-in-Public-Equity-Markets-in-Asia.pdf
20. OECD. (2015). G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. https://www.oecd.org/daf/ca/Corporate-Governance-Principles-ENG.pdf
21. Scopino, G.(2015).The (Questionable) Legality of High-Speed "Pinging" and "Front Running" in the Futures Markets.Connecticut Law Review,47(3),607-697.
22. Shah, S.,Brorsen, B. W.(2011).Electronic vs. Open Outcry: Side-by-Side Trading of KCBT Wheat Futures.Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics,36(1),48-62.
23. Singapore Telecommunications Ltd. (2019). Shareholder Information. https://cdn.aws.singtel.com/annualreport/2019/files/Shareholder_Information.pdf
24. Tsetsekos, G. P., & Varangis, P. (1997). The Structure of Derivatives Exchanges: Lessons from Developed and Emerging Markets. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=623890
25. Zetzsche, D. A.,Anker-Sørensen, L.,Consiglio, R.,Yeboah-Smith, M.(2020).University of Luxembourg Faculty of Law, Economics & Finance WPSUniversity of Luxembourg Faculty of Law, Economics & Finance WPS,未出版
26. Zetzsche, D. A.,Arner, D. W.,Buckley, R. P.(2020).Decentralized Finance (DeFi).Journal of Financial Regulation,02,172-203.
27. 王文宇(2018).公司法論.元照.
28. 台灣積體電路製造股份有限公司（2021），《台灣積體電路股份有限公司民國一百零九年度年報（一）》，載於：https://investor.tsmc.com/static/annualReports/2020/chinese/pdf/c_all.pdf
29. 台灣積體電路製造股份有限公司（2020）， 《民國一百零九年股東常會會議紀錄》， 載於：https://investor.tsmc.com/sites/ir/shareholders-meeting/2020-06-09/ChineseMeetingMinutes2020.pdf。
30. 台灣積體電路製造股份有限公司（2021）， 《民國一百一十年股東常會議事手冊》， 載於：https://investor.tsmc.com/sites/ir/shareholders-meeting/2021-07-26/2021AGM_UpdatedAgenda_C.pdf
31. 行政院金融監督管理委員會（2021），〈因應疫情公開發行公司股東會延期召開相關措施〉，載於：https://www.fsc.gov.tw/uploaddowndoc?file=newslaw/202108030844130.pdf&filedisplay=%E5%85%AC%E5%91%8A%E9%99%84%E4%BB%B6%E6%AA%94.pdf&flag=doc
32. 行政院金融監督管理委員會（06/16/2021），〈因應疫情 3 級警戒召開股東會防疫作業指引〉，載於：https://www.fsc.gov.tw/userfiles/file/%E5%9B%A0%E6%87%89%E7%96%AB%E6%83%853%E7%B4%9A%E8%AD%A6%E6%88%92%E5%8F%AC%E9%96%8B%E8%82%A1%E6%9D%B1%E6%9C%83%E9%98%B2%E7%96%AB%E4%BD%9C%E6%A5%AD%E6%8C%87%E5%BC%95.pdf
33. 黃朝琮,余欣慧(2021)。線上／視訊股東會之探討。月旦會計實務研究，44，47-53。
34. 經濟部商業司（08/24/2021），〈為因應嚴重特殊傳染性肺炎疫情非公開發行公司召開股東會之相關問答集〉，載於：https://gcis.nat.gov.tw/mainNew/subclassNAction.do?method=getFile&pk=1118。

1. 邵慶平(2022)。2021年公司法與證券交易法發展回顧。臺大法學論叢，51(S)，1285-1311。
2. (2023)。公司治理新途徑──論公開發行公司視訊股東會議法制。中原財經法學，50，163-225。