刑事司法精神鑑定之挑戰與期待

Forensic Psychiatric Examination for Criminal Cases: Challenges and Hopes

10.6199/NTULJ.202212_51(4).0006

吳建昌(Kevin Chien-Chang Wu)；劉靜婷(Ching-Ting Liu)

司法精神鑑定 ； 刑事案件 ； 刑事責任能力 ； 倫理 ； 品質 ； 科學證據 ； 詐病 ； 教化可能性 ； 藥物輔助會談 ； 創傷後壓力症 ； Forensic Psychiatric Examination ； criminal case ； criminal responsibility ； ethics ； quality ； scientific evidence ； malinger ； corrigibility ； drug-assisted interview ； post-traumatic stress disorder

臺大法學論叢

51卷4期（2022 / 12 / 01）

1667 - 1733

繁體中文;英文

司法精神醫學（Forensic psychiatry）在20世紀後期正式成為特殊的精神醫學次專科。隨著我國最近十餘年來數起重大刑案發生，涉及被告之司法精神鑑定屢屢成為社會與媒體矚目焦點，亦有許多對於刑事司法精神鑑定之檢討聲浪，因此，筆者藉本文探討並釐清刑事司法鑑定可能遭遇到之重大問題與挑戰，並提出未來可能之一般因應方案。於介紹司法精神醫學與司法精神鑑定之概念後，本文首先描述刑事司法鑑定與本論文核心挑戰議題有關項目內容與其重點。在第參節，本文概述刑事司法精神鑑定程序，涵蓋刑事司法鑑定模式、刑事司法精神鑑定之特殊倫理考量，收集物證、人證之範圍與方式、以及撰寫鑑定報告時應注意之事項。於第肆節，本文將提出幾個刑事司法鑑定遭遇之重要倫理法律問題及科學性問題（包括理論與實務操作部份）；尤其是關於科學證據之運用（心理衡鑑、藥物輔助會談、神經科學證據等）、詐病評估、教化可能性評估、創傷後壓力症及刑事司法鑑定品質之問題等，皆會提出探討。在第伍節，本文將對於未來刑事司法精神鑑定提出展望與建議，即使無法完全解決第肆節所遭遇之問題，然而以循序漸進之修正方式，以實用主義之精神運用刑事司法精神鑑定，仍可某程度達到提升刑事司法公平正義之目的。

Forensic psychiatry became a subspecialty in psychiatry in the last half of the twentieth century. In recent ten more years in Taiwan, more and more major criminal cases drew the attention of the public. Forensic psychiatric examinations on the defendants of these cases often emerged as the target of social and media commentaries that requested for the reform of criminal forensic psychiatric examinations. Therefore, we explore and clarify the important problems and challenges encountered when conducting such examinations, and then propose general measures to deal with these issues in the future. After introducing the concepts of forensic psychiatry and forensic psychiatric examination, section two describes various categories of criminal forensic psychiatric examinations and their main contents that are most related to the core challenging issues in the paper. They include criminal responsibility, competency to stand trial, competency to be executed, corrigibility, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Section three covers the general procedure of conducting the examinations, including the modes of examinations, specific ethical considerations, scopes and methods of evidence collections and witness interviews, and the guide and caveat when writing examination reports. Section four addresses important ethical and scientific issues in conducting the examinations, including the theoretical and practical parts. Specifically highlighted are those related to quality of reports, psychological examinations, drug-assisted interviews, neuroscience evidence, malingering, corrigibility, and post-traumatic stress disorder. The paper concludes at section five by depicting the ways that could address the above challenges. It is important to further the professionalization of forensic psychiatry in Taiwan through fellowship training, specialty licensure, and academic research. Transdisciplinary and international collaboration is much needed to enhance medical-legal communication and quality of forensic psychiatric examinations and related studies. Realistically speaking, all the issues pinpointed above could not be solved right away. It is hoped that through incremental and pragmatic refinement of criminal forensic psychiatric examinations, the policy goals of criminal justice could be fulfilled better than ever.

1. 吳建昌(2018)。道德責任能力、自由意志與神經科學：一個實用主義的觀察。生命教育研究，10(2)，57-100。
   連結：
2. 林志潔(2009)。論美國法上犯罪主觀要件與精神障礙心智缺陷抗辯：Clark v. Arizona 案之判決評析。歐美研究，39(4)，615-670。
   連結：
3. 謝煜偉(2018)。論「教化可能性」在死刑量刑判斷上的意義與定位：從最高法院 102 年度台上字第 170 號判決到 105 年度台上字第 984 號判決之演變。臺北大學法學論叢，105，133-186。
   連結：
4. American Psychiatric Association(2013).Desk Reference to the Diagnostic Criteria from DSM-5.American Psychiatric Publishing.
5. Eastman, N.,Adshead, G.,Fox, S.,Latham, R.,Whyte, S.(2012).Forensic Psychiatry (Oxford Specialist Handbooks in Psychiatry).Oxford University Press.
6. Fabian, J. M.(2003).Death penalty mitigation and the role of the forensic psychologist.Law and Psychology Review,27,73-120.
7. Fine, T. M.(1998).Moratorium 2000: An International Dialogue Toward a Ban on Capital Punishment.Columbia Human Right Law Review,30(2),421-440.
8. Foa, E. B.,Rothbaum, B. O.,Riggs, D. S.,Murdock, T. B.(1991).Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Rape Victims: A Comparison Between Cognitive-Behavioral Procedures and Counseling.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,59(5),715-723.
9. Gamer, M.(2014).Mind reading using neuroimaging: Is this the future of deception detection?.European Psychologist,19(3),172-183.
10. Gazzaniga, M. S.(2005).The Ethical Brain: The Science of Our Moral Dilemmas.Dana press.
11. Giocoli, N.(2020).Rejected! antitrust economists as expert witnesses in the post-daubert world.Journal of the History of Economic Thought,42(2),203-228.
12. Glancy, G. D.,Ash, P.,Bath, E. P.,Buchanan, A.,Fedoroff, P.,Frierson, R. L.,Harris, V. L.,Friedman, S. J. H.,Hauser, M. J.,Knoll, J.,Norko, M.,Pinals, D.,Price, M.,Recupero, P.,Scott, C. L.,Zonana, H. V(2015).AAPL Practice Guideline for the Forensic Assessment.The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law,43(2 Suppl),S3-S53.
13. Griffith, E. E. H.,Stankovic, A.,Baranoski, M.(2010).Conceptualizing the forensic psychiatry report as performative narrative.The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law,38(1),32-42.
14. Gutheil, T. G.,Stein, M. D.(2000).Daubert-based gatekeeping and psychiatric/psychological testimony in court: Review and proposal.The Journal of Psychiatry & Law,28,235-251.
15. Helland, E.,Klick, J.(2012).Does Anyone Get Stopped at the Gate? An Empirical Assessment of the Daubert Trilogy in the States.Supreme Court Economic Review,20(1),1-33.
16. Iacono, W. G.,Patrick, C. J.(2018).Assessing deception: Polygraph techniques and integrity testing.Clinical assessment of malingering and deception
17. Kaplan, H. I.,Sadock, B. J.(1998).Kaplan and Sadock's synopsis of psychiatry: Behavioral sciences, clinical psychiatry.Williams & Wilkins Co..
18. Kavirajan, H.(1999).The amobarbital interview revisited: a review of the literature since 1966.Harvard review of psychiatry,7(3),153-165.
19. Langleben, D. D.,Hakun, J. G.,Seelig, D.,Wang, A. L.,Ruparel, K.,Bilker, W. B.,Gur, R. C.(2016).Polygraphy and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Lie Detection: A Controlled Blind Comparison Using the Concealed Information Test.The Journal of clinical psychiatry,77(10),1372-1380.
20. Lee, S. S.,Park, S.,Park, S. S.(2011).Use of Lorazepam in Drug-Assisted Interviews: Two Cases of Dissociative Amnesia.Psychiatry Investig,8(4),377-80.
21. Litwack, T. R.(2003).The competency of criminal defendants to refuse, for delusional reasons, a viable insanity defense recommended by counsel.Behavioral sciences & the law,21(2),135-156.
22. Masterson, L. R.(1998).Witness immunity or malpractice liability for professionals hired as experts.The Review of Litigation,17(2),393-418.
23. McDermott, B. E.(2018).Evaluation of malingering.The American Psychiatric Asssociation publishing textbook of forensic psychiatry
24. Melton, G. B.,Petrila, J.,Poythress, N. G.,Slobogin, C.,Lyons, P. M.,Otto, R. K.(2007).Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers.The Guilford Press.
25. Melton, G. B.,Petrila, J.,Poythress, N. G.,Slobogin, C.,Otto, R. K.,Mossman, D.,Condie, L. O.(2018).Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers.The Guilford Press.
26. Meynen, G.(2019).Forensic psychiatry and neurolaw: Description, developments, and debates.International journal of law and psychiatry,65,1-6.
27. Morse, S. J.(2006).Addiction, genetics, and criminal responsibility.Law and Contemporary Problems,69(1/2),165-207.
28. Morse, S. J.(2007).The non‐problem of free will in forensic psychiatry and psychology.Behavioral sciences & the law,25(2),203-220.
29. Morse, S. J.(2018).Neuroscience evidence in forensic contexts: Ethical concerns.Ethics Challenges in Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology Practice
30. Murrie, D. C.,Boccaccini, M. T.(2015).Adversarial allegiance among expert witnesses.Annual Review of Law and Social Science,11,37-55.
31. Okasha, A.(2003).The Declaration of Madrid and its implementation. An update.World Psychiatry,2(2),65-67.
32. Olver, M. E.,Lewis, K.,Wong, S. C. P.(2013).Risk reduction treatment of high-risk psychopathic offenders: The relationship of psychopathy and treatment change to violent recidivism.Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment,4(2),160-167.
33. Piper, A., Jr(1993)."Truth serum" and "recovered memories" of sexual abuse: a review of the evidence.The Journal of Psychiatry & Law,21(4),447-471.
34. Resnick, P. J.,Knoll, J. L., IV.(2018).Malingered psychosis.Clinical assessment of malingering and deception
35. Rogers, R.(2018).Structured Interviews and Dissimulation.Clinical assessment of malingering and deception
36. Rogers, R.(2018).Detection strategies for malingering and defensiveness.Clinical assessment of malingering and deception
37. Rosenhan, D. L.(1973).On being sane in insane places.Science,179(4070),250-258.
38. Roskies, A. L.(2014).Can neuroscience resolve issues about free will?.Moral psychology: Free will and moral responsibility
39. Rosner, R.(Ed.),Scott, C.(Ed.)(2017).Principles and practice of forensic psychiatry.Chemical Rubber Company Press.
40. Scott, C. L.(2012).Evaluating amnesia for criminal behavior: a guide to remember.Psychiatric Clinics of North America,35(4),797-819.
41. Tarescavage, A. M.,Glassmire, D. M.(2016).Differences between Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and SIRS-2 sensitivity estimates among forensic inpatients: A criterion groups comparison.Law and Human Behavior,40(5),488-502.
42. Wegner, D. M.(2018).The illusion of conscious will.The MIT press.
43. Young, G.(2016).Psychiatric/psychological forensic report writing.International journal of law and psychiatry,49(Pt B),214-220.
44. 王皇玉(2019).刑法總則.新學林.
45. 王皇玉(2018)。死刑量刑準則之意義。台灣法學雜誌，347，75-88。
46. 吳建昌(2020)。成癮、心智科學與刑事責任能力。主體、理性與人權的彼岸：李茂生教授六秩晉五祝壽論文集
47. 吳燦(2018)。「教化可能性」於死刑案件量刑中之定位。檢察新論，23，15-26。
48. 李念祖(2017)。教化可能性的舉證責任與說服門檻。在野法潮，34，6-9。
49. 周煌智（編）,吳建昌（編）,楊添圍（編）(2014).司法精神醫學手冊.台灣精神醫學會.
50. 林俊益(2017).刑事訴訟法概論（上）.新學林.
51. 林鈺雄(2009).新刑法總則.元照.
52. 林臻嫻(2018)。再談教化可能性：兼評最高法院 105 年度台上字第 984號判決。全國律師，22(12)，41-57。
53. 張麗卿(2004)。精神鑑定的問題與挑戰。東海大學法學研究，20，153-186。
54. 黃致豪(2018)。恣意的教化可能：取徑行為科學以重構教化之可能性。月旦醫事法報告，20，44-55。
55. 廖建瑜(2021)。刑事精神鑑定之實證研究：2016 年至 2021 年法院事實審統計。月旦醫事法報告，59，7-21。
56. 謝煜偉(2018)。量刑事實之調查與量刑情狀鑑定。檢察新論，23，27-36。