The Study on the Relationship between Driving Safety Perception and Aberrant Driving Behavior for Tourist Bus Drivers

遊覽車駕駛行車安全認知與偏差駕駛行為關係之研究

10.29801/THTJ.201007.0008

高筱婷(Hsiao-Ting Kao)；謝豪生(How-Son Hsieh)；陳建和(Chien-Ho Chen)

遊覽車 ； 行車安全 ； 偏差駕駛行為 ； tourist bus ； driving safety ； aberrant driving behavior

臺灣觀光學報

7期（2010 / 07 / 01）

133 - 144

英文

近年來觀光旅遊活動日趨熱絡且迅速成長，然在觀光發展的同時遊覽車肇事事故頻傳，故其車輛安全管理亦爲社會大眾所重視之課題。因此，本研究以遊覽車駕駛者之觀點分別探討影響駕駛者之安全因素與偏差駕駛行爲之關係架構。研究中將偏差駕駛行爲分爲違規、錯誤、輕微疏失三項，進一步探究駕駛者人爲、車輛、道路與環境認知因素對偏差駕駛行爲之影響，用以衡量行車安全。研究以旅行社遊覽車駕駛爲調查對象，於市區與非市區觀光景點進行抽樣，設計符合國內遊覽車駕駛之問卷，並以LISREL爲主要研究分析工具。結果顯示，人爲認知因素影響最大，並分爲內部與外部影響因素加以探討，其他車輛、道路、環境因素之理論架構與研究假設均獲得支持，以提供政府部門及相關產業，行車安全管理措施之研擬與推動，進而提昇台灣觀光旅遊服務品質。

Tourism is booming in the modern world, and tourist buses are becoming more important mass transportation vehicles. Unexpectedly, tourist bus accidents have occurred frequently. The question of how to conduct an effective safety management on tourist buses is becoming an important issue for the society. The purpose of this study is to explore the safety factors and aberrant driving behavior of tourist bus drivers. We divided aberrant driving behaviors into three categories: violation, mistake and lapses. Furthermore, we try to investigate the relationship between aberrant driving behavior and safety factors, which can be subdivided into personal factor, bus factor, road factor and environment factor effect. The research participants for this study are tourist bus drivers working for travel agencies. We conduct convenient sampling from urban and rural areas. Questionnaires were collected to explore the relationship on multiple factors through LISREL. The research results revealed that the most important safety factors for tourist bus drivers is bus driver’s personal factor especially on safety related perception.

1. 交通部觀光局(2005)。交通政策白皮書—觀光。台北:
   連結：
2. 交通部觀光局(2005)。交通政策白皮書—觀光。台北:
   連結：
3. 溫傑華(2004)。非號誌化路口違規駕駛行為影響因素之研究。運輸學刊，16(2)，183-202。
   連結：
4. Ajzen, I.(1991).The theory of planned behavior.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,50,179-211.
5. Ajzen, I.,Madden, T. J.(1986).Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes intentions and perceived behavioral control.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,42,426-435.
6. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16,74-94.
7. Blockey, P. N.,Hartley, L. R.(1995).Aberrant driving behavior : errors and violations.Ergonomics,38,1759 -1711.
8. Gerbing, D.,Anderson, J.(1988).An Update Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment.Journal of Marketing Research,25,186-192.
9. Goldberger, A.S.(Ed.),Duncan, O.D.(Ed.)(1973).Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences.New York:
10. Gulian, E.,Matthews, G.,Glendon, A. I.,Davies, D. R.,Debney, L. M.(1989).Dimensions of Driver Stress.Ergonomics,32,585-602.
11. Kline, R. B.(1998).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.New York:The Guilford Press.
12. Lajunen, T.,Summala, H.(2003).Can We Trust Self-reports of Driving? Effects of Impression Management on Driver Behaviour Questionnaire Responses.Transportation Research Part F,6,97-107.
13. Michelle, A. R.,Steiner, M.(2000).Provoked Driver Aggression and Status: A Field Study.Transportation Research Part F,3,167-179.
14. Reason, J.,Manstead, A.,Stradling, S.,Baxter, J.,Campbell, K.(1990).Errors and violations on the road : A real distinction.Ergonomics,33,1315-1332.
15. Rimmö, P.,Åberg, L.(1999).On the Distinction between Violations and Errors: Sensation Seeking Associations.Transportation Research Part F,2,151-166.
16. Rosenbloom, Tova,Shahar, Amit(2007).Differences between taxi and nonprofessional male drivers in attitudes towards traffic-violation penalties.Transportation Research Part F,10,428-435.
17. Shinar, D.,Treat, J. R.,Tumbas, N. S.,McDonald, S. T.,Hume, R. D.,Mayer, R. E.,Stanisfer, R. L.,Castillan, N. J.(1977).,Indiana University.
18. Sümer, Nebi(2003).Personality and Behavioral Predictors of Traffic Accidents: Testing a Contextual Mediated Model.Accident Analysis and Prevention,35,949-964.
19. Sümer, Nebi,Özkan, Turker,Lajunen, T.(2006).Asymmetric relationship between driving and safety skills.Accident Analysis and Prevention,38,703-711.
20. Taylor, S.,Todd, P.(1995).Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior : a study of consumer adoption intentions.International Journal of Research in Marketing,12,137-155.
21. 黃芳銘(2006)。結構方程模式理論與應用。台北:五南書局。
22. 劉正華(1999)。駕駛行為與肇事概率之關聯性研究。Journal of the Institute of Industrial Engineers，16(1)，161-172。
23. 蔡中志(2000)。酒後駕駛對交通安全之影響。警光，522，21-23。
24. 蔡婕妤(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。東海大學應用統計研究所。
25. 謝智仁(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立交通大學運輸科技與管理學系。

1. 董孟修(2019)。遊覽車司機工作困境與職場韌性歷程之研究。運輸學刊，31(1)，61-92。
2. 劉翠華,莫桂娥,李粵強(2019)。如何管理遊覽車駕駛員的工作壓力？認知因應策略作用之啟示。發展與前瞻學報，26，93-122。