原住民地區觀光地景意象之研究－以花蓮縣台九丙沿線原住民部落區為例

Study of Indigenous Areas Image of the Tourism Landscape-Hualien County, Tai-Chiu-Bing Provincial Road along the Aboriginal Areas

10.29801/THTJ.201206.0007

周焦元輝(Yuan-Huei Chou chiao)；賈立人(LI-Jen Chia)；郭金水(Jen-Shoei Kuo)

遊憩資源區 ； 地景意象 ； 因素分析 ； District of recreation resources ； landscape imagery ； factor analysis

臺灣觀光學報

9期（2012 / 06 / 01）

113 - 130

繁體中文

沿花東縱谷台九丙公路沿線、屬花蓮縣壽豐鄉鯉魚潭遊憩區周邊谷地，由慕谷慕魚中心為起點，沿池南路一、二段，至中山路七段、中央路二段交叉口止，主要涵蓋秀林鄉太魯閣族榕樹、銅門、文蘭、米亞丸、重光五個部落及壽豐鄉阿美族池南、光榮兩個部落。再此全長約10公里台九丙沿線帶狀區域，卻擁有極豐富的自然及人文觀光資源，著實讓人驚豔，但觀光資源的整合再此區卻明顯不足，本研究試圖運用地景意象建構出以部落為核心之遊憩節點，以利後續整合為帶狀遊憩區之建構。本研究成果將此區分為四大遊憩資源節點，北有榕樹－銅門慕谷慕魚生態遊憩資源節點、文蘭－池南鯉魚潭遊憩資源節點、池南－米亞丸遊憩資源節點、光榮－重光荖溪－白鮑溪遊憩資源節點。地景意象是指遊客所感覺到的世界。以此概念將此四區觀光資源本身的意象，經因素分析，得到潭湖、山林、廊道、溪流四個意象區，並評估出遊客最中意的意象區以第一廊道區、第二山林區、第三潭湖區、第四溪流區，本研究結果推翻過去眾人以潭湖區為主要意象區的認知，而以廊道區及山林區為主要意象區。以上研究結論建議，本區應做系統整合工作，如整體觀光資源調查及規劃，各相關政府單位經費統籌運用在共同宣傳行銷，帶狀、多點、持續性的活動辦理，將可延續此區的觀光人潮及遊客留駐時間，而本區行銷要整合水域活動、生態旅遊、露營、溯溪、採玉、原住民射箭、手工藝、原住民美食等觀光資源，結合社群與協會組織運作，並配合地方意象辦理節慶活動，以吸引顧客。

Shoufeng Township, Hualien County, Carp Lake Recreation District surrounding valley along the road, the total length of about 10 km belt area, but has a very rich natural and cultural tourism resources, but the lack of integration of tourism resources, this study attempts to use the image of the landscape to the establishment of recreation points order to facilitate future integration.The results of this study is divided into four recreation resource points, factor analysis, lakes, forests, walkways, streams, four image District, and to assess the tourists favorite images in order for the walkway area, forest area, the Lake District, stream area.The study results to overthrow the cognition of the past all the main image area to the Lake District, for the main image area to the walkway area and forest area. Above result suggests that the district should do the investigation and planning of the overall tourism resources, funding co-ordination of all relevant government agencies to use in co-promotional marketing will increase the residence time of the tourist crowds and tourists in this area.

1. 十村太郎，1937（昭和13年），景觀地理學講話，地人書館，東京，頁1-10。
2. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Free Press。
3. Berlyne, D. E.(1960).Conflict. Arousal and curiosity.New York:McGraw-Hill.
4. Brunswick, E.(1956).Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments.Berkeley:University of California Press.
5. Downing, K.,Clark, R. N.(1976).Users and Managers Perceptions of Dispersed Recreation Impacts: AFocus on Roaded Forest Lands.The Recreational Impact on Wildlands conference Proceedings
6. Fisher, J.D.,Bell, P.A.,Baum, A.(1984).Environmental psychology.CBS College Publishing.
7. Ittelson, W. H.(1978).Environmental perception and urban experience.Environment and Behavior,10(2),193-213.
8. Ittelson, W. H.(1974).Environmental and Cognition.
9. Ittner(Ed.).Recreational impact on wildland,:
10. Leopold, L. B.(1969).Landscape Esthetics.Ekistics,29(173),271-272.
11. Litton, R. B., Jr.(1968).Forest landscape description and inventories: a basis for land planning and design.USDA, Forest Service Research Paper, PSW,49-64.
12. Logan, W. S.(1968).The changing landscape significance of the Victoria-South Australia Boundry.Annals of The Association of American Geography,58(1),129-139.
13. Lynch, K.(1960).The Image of the City.Cambridge, Mass:MIT Press.
14. Rapport, A.(1977).Human Aspects of Urban Form.
15. Sauer, Carl O(1952).The Morphology of Landscape.Univ. of California.
16. Schiffman, Leon G.,Kanuk, Leslie Lazar(1978).Consumer Behavior.
17. Wylie, John(2007).Landscape.New York, NY:Routledge.
18. 王洪文(1988)。地理思想。明文書局。
19. 李素馨(1982)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學園藝研究所。
20. 李澤厚(1987)。美學論集。板橋市:駱駝出版社。
21. 阿部一(1990)。景觀場所物語。地理學評論，63(7)，453-465。
22. 賈立人、郭金水(2007)。北海岸地區遊憩空間的文化景觀特性與相關課題。國民教育，48(2)，39-49。
23. 魏朝政(1992)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。逢大建築及都計所。
24. 嚴勝雄(1978)。地理思想史。六國出版社。