题名

觀光典範課程品質之研究

并列篇名

The Study of Paradigm Curriculum for Quality Development in Hospitality and Tourism Higher Education

DOI

10.29801/THTJ.201206.0004

作者

邱道生(Tao-Sheng Chiu)

关键词

觀光教育 ; 典範課程 ; 課程品質 ; Hospitality and Tourism Higher Education ; Paradigm Curriculum ; Curriculum Quality

期刊名称

臺灣觀光學報

卷期/出版年月

9期(2012 / 06 / 01)

页次

53 - 75

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

近年來,許多大學紛紛轉型或投入以觀光教育為主軸的院校及系所,多數的教師面臨一系列的課程變革,擁有極大的挑戰。在此過程中,教師不是自行摸索,就是臨摹他校,甚至他國的課程。基於此理由,本研究以課程品質之精神為基礎,探究學校專業學群課程的內涵,企圖從中發展出足以轉移的典範課程,並建立維持觀光教育的課程品質機制之可能性。為達此目標,本研究以文獻分析及問卷方式進行,了解校基礎專業課程對教育目標、專業素養及核心能力培養的助益程度。研究結果顯示不同屬性學生在教育目標與核心能力上有顯著差異;基礎課程對核心能力有顯著差異。此外教育目標、課程與核心能力之間亦具相關性。本研究期望透過分析結果,進一步解釋基礎課程的內涵,以供學校發展典範課程的參考。

英文摘要

In recent years, more and more colleges have adopted exit strategy toward the tourism education and expanding the departments under the realm. Most of teachers have to face a series of the reforming and challenge of curriculum. In this process, teachers are either developing curriculum by self or allochthonous copying. Base on the above description, this paper was not only researched the curriculum quality, inquires the intension of core curriculum but tried to develop paradigm curriculum and establishes the possibility of curriculum quality mechanism.Literatures analysis and questionnaire method were adopted. The object is the core curriculum of THT. Research analysis shows that, there is a significant difference between the students' attributes and core abilities. There is a significant difference between the core curriculum and core ability. In addition, there is a significant relationship among the object of school, core curriculum and core ability. Furthermore, the result also showed that there is significant difference between the hidden curriculum and core ability.

主题分类 人文學 > 地理及區域研究
参考文献
  1. 洪久賢(2003)。從美澳餐旅教育發展模式反思台灣餐旅教育之發展。師大學報,48(2),125-150。
    連結:
  2. Angelo, T. A.,Cross, K. P.(1993).Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
  3. Biggs, J. B.(1996).Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment.Higher Education,32,1-18.
  4. Bornmann, L., S.,Mittag, S.,Danie, H. D.(2006).Quality assurance in higher education-meta-evaluation of multi-stage evaluation procedures in Germany.Higher Education,52(4),687-709.
  5. Boyle, P.,Boice, B.(1998).Systematic Mentoring for New FacultyTeachers and Graduate Teaching Assistants.Innovative Higher Education,22(3),157-179.
  6. Chathoth, P.,Sharma, A.(2007).Core Curricular Issues in Hospitality and Tourism Education - Present Structure and Future Directions.Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education,19(1),10-19.
  7. Cuevas, N. M.,Matveev, A. G.,Feit, M. D.(2009).Curriculum mapping: An approach to study coherence of program curricula.Department Cnair,20(1),23-26.
  8. Huang, S.,Su, J. L.(2005).Establishment of an integrated evaluation system for Taiwan's university: Integrating internal evaluation and external meta-evaluation.Paper presented at the Redesigning Pedagogy: Research, Policy, Practice
  9. Kember, D.(1997).A reconcepualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching.Learning and Instruction,7(3),255-275.
  10. Lawrence, R. J.,Robert, A. O.(1997).A violation of assumption: Why TQM won't work in the ivory tower.Journal of Quality Management,2(2),279-291.
  11. Levine, T.(2002).Stability and change in curriculum evaluation.Studies in Educational Evaluation,28,1-33.
  12. Mehralizadeh, Y.,Safaeemoghaddam, M.(2010).The applicability of quality management systems and models to higher education.TQM Journal,22(2),175-187.
  13. Meyer, M. H.,Bushney, M. J.(2008).Towards a multi-stakeholder-driven model for excellence in higher education curriculum development.South African Journal of Higher Education,22(6),1229-1240.
  14. Rana, R. A.,Reid, N.(2008).Dimensions of quality assurance in higher education: Challenges for future.the 2nd International conference on Assessing Quality in Higher Education,Lahore, Pakistan:
  15. Veijola, S.,Jokinen, E.(1994).The body in tourism.Theory, Culture and Society,11,125-151.
  16. Venkatraman, S.(2007).A framework for implementing TQM in higher education programs.Quality Assurance in Education,15(1),92-112.
  17. Williams, D. A.(2005).Contemporary Approaches to Hospitality Curriculum Design.The Consortium Journal of Hospitality and Tourism,9(2),69-83.
  18. Wingate, U.(2007).A Framework for Transition: Supporting Learning to Learn in Higher Education.Higher Education Quarterly,61(3),391-405.
  19. 何卓飛、王明源(2009)。我國大學課程的沿革與發展。教育研究月刊,186,5-18。
  20. 李坤崇(2009)。成果導向教育的大學課程革新。教育研究月刊,181,100-116。
  21. 李雪莉、彭昱融(2008)。哈佛的難題:聰明、會考試,卻不會問問題 「怎麼教」比「教什麼」更重要。天下雜誌,410
  22. 張善楠譯、Bok, Derek(2008)。大學教了沒?─前哈佛校長提出的八門課。臺北:天下文化。
  23. 劉元安(2007)。世界觀光組織的觀光教育品質認證制度。評鑑,7,59-60。
  24. 歐用生(2003)。課程典範再建構。高雄:麗文。