優秀大專跆拳道選手的知覺教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力之研究

The Study of Elite Collegiate Tae-kwon-do Student-athlete Leadership Behavior and Cohesion

10.29632/CRYDSSSK.200806.0009

林仁彬；黃朝嘉；張志青

跆拳道 ； 獎學金 ； 教練領導 ； 凝聚力 ； tae-kwon-do ； scholarship leadership behavior and cohesion

長榮運動休閒學刊

2期（2008 / 06 / 01）

90 - 100

繁體中文

本研究的主要目的，探討在不同性別、訓練年數、獎學金對優秀跆拳道選手在知覺領導行為和團隊凝聚力上是否有差異，並瞭解知覺領導行為和團隊凝聚力之關係。研究對象為擁有全國前三名成績之大專跆拳道選手，共94位完成兩份問卷，運動領導行為(LSS)和團隊凝聚力(GEQ)。資料經過t檢定、單因子變異數分析及皮爾遜積差相關分析，結果如下：一、大專選手知覺教練領導行為，依序為：訓練與指導、民主行為、社會支持、正面回饋、專制行為。二、在性別方面，男生選手對教練領導行為之訓練與指導及專制行為方面顯著高於女生選手；不同訓練年數及獎學金變項在教練領導行為上認知並未達顯著差異。三、在團隊凝聚力方面依序為：個人吸引、個人親和、團隊合作、團隊適應。四.不同性別及訓練年數變項在團隊凝聚力上未達顯著差異，而獎學金變項在團隊凝聚力上達顯著差異，有特別比賽獎金的選手在個人親和方面的團隊凝聚力會高於沒有獎學金的選手。五、知覺教練領導各構面與團隊凝聚力各構面大部分具有顯著相關。本研究建議，提高男生之訓練與指導和獎學金，可增進選手的參與動機，提升運動表現。

The study was investigate to the relationship of difference gender, scholarship status with leadership behavior and cohesion in tae-kwon-do players. The subjects were 40 female and 54 male student-athletes in top 3 national competition finish two questionnaires: Leadership Scale Sports lead the behavior (LSS) and group's cohesiveness (GEQ). The data was analyzed by independent t-test, Pearson's relation and one-way ANOVA. The results showed that: 1.perception leadership behavior: training instruction, democratic behavior, social support, positive feedback and autocratic behavior. 2. In the gender variable, male players was had significant high than female players on training instruction and autocratic behavior. The training time and scholarship variables were not significant difference on perception of leadership behavior. 3. The order of team cohesion is GIS, GIT, ATGT and ATGS. 4. The gender and training time variables were significant difference on team cohesion, but the scholarship variable was not. The special scholarship players were had high GIT than no scholarship players. 5. There's positive relationship of training instruction with social support and positive feedback. There's negative relation of autocratic behavior and GIS. The researcher suggest improve mal training instruction and scholarship to promote athlete participate motivation and sport performance.

1. 蔣憶德、陳淑滿、葉志仙(2001)。教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力之相關研究。體育學報，30，195-206。
   連結：
2. Amorose, A.J.,Horn, T.(2000).Intrinsic motivation: Relationship with collegiate athletes' gender, scholarship status, and perceptions of their coaches' behavior.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,22,63-84.
3. Beam, J. W.,Serwatka, T. S.,Wilson, W. J.(2004).Preferred Leadership of NCAA Division I and II Intercollegiate Student-Athletes.Journal of Sport Behavior,27(1),3-17.
4. Carron, A.V.,Bray, S.R.,Eys, M.A.(2002).Teams cohesion and team success in sport.Journal Sports Science,20(2),119-1226.
5. Carron, A.V.,Chelladurai, P.(1981).The dynamics of group cohesion in sport.Journal of Sport Psychology,3,123-139.
6. Carron, A.V.,Widmeyer, W. N.,Brawley, L. R.(1985).The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire.Journal of Sport Psychology,7,244-266.
7. Chelladurai, P.,Saleh, S. D.(1980).Dimensions of leadership behavior in sports: Development of a leadership scale.Journal of Sport Psychology,2,34-45.
8. Dirks, K. T.(2000).Trust in leadership and team performance: evidence from NCAA basketball.Journal Applied Psychology,85(6),1004-1012.
9. Gardner, D. E.,Shields, D. L.,Bredemeir, B. J.,Bostrom, A.(1996).The relationship between perceived coaching behaviors and team cohesion among baseball and softball players.The Sport Psychologist,10,367-381.
10. Heuzw, P.,Raimbault, N.,Fontayne, P.(2006).Relationships between cohesion, collective efficacy and performance in professional basketball teams: An examination of mediating effects.Journal Sports Science,24(1),59-68.
11. Martens, R.(1987).Coaches guide to sport psychology.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
12. Matheson, H.,Mathes, S.,Murray, M.(1997).The effect of winning and losing on female interactive and coactive team cohesion.Journal of Sport Behavior,20,284-299.
13. Mohsen K.,Heather S.,Young S. C.(2005).Pre-competition habits and injuries in Tae-kwon-do athletes.BMC Musculoskelet Disord,6,26.
14. Ryan, E. D. ,L. I. Gedvilas (Eds.),M. E. Kneer (Eds.)(1977).Proceedings of the National College Physical Education Association.Chicago, IL:Office of Publications Services.
15. Ryan, E. D.,C. H. Nadeau(Eds.),W. R. Halliwell(Eds.),K. M. Newell(Eds.),G. C. Roberts (Eds.)(1980).Psychology of Motor Behavior and Sport.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics Press.
16. Salmines, S.,Luhtanen, P.(1998).Cohesion predicts success in junior ice hockey.Percept Motor Skills,87(2),649-650.
17. Serpa, S.,Antunes, I.(1989).Leadership styles of elite Portuguese women's volleyball coaches.Paper presented the 6th International Congress on Sport Psychology,Lathti. Finland:
18. Spink, K. S.,Carron, A. B.(1994).Group cohesion effects in exercise classes.Small Group Research,25,26-42.
19. Terry, P. C.,Howe, B. L.(1984).Coaching preferences of athletes.Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences,9,188-193.
20. Westre, K.,Weiss, M.(1991).The relationship between perceived coaching behaviors and group cohesion in high school football teams.The Sport Psychologist,5,41-54.
21. Widmeyer, W. N.,Carron, A. V.,Brawley, L. R.(1993).Handbook of research on sport psychology.New York:Macmillan.
22. 李柳汶(2003)。大專甲組跆拳道教練領導行為之研究。體育學報，34，113-122。
23. 李麗珍、陳淑滿(2005)。不同性別、獎學金等級選手知覺教練領導行為與內在動機之研究。台灣運動心理學報，6，56-69。

1. 邱聯榮、呂謙、江金山(2009)。2008北京奧運跆拳道比賽觀賞行為實證之研究。運動休閒管理學報，6(1)，26-44。