國中體育教師自我概念、教學信念與教學自我效能之線性結構關係分析

An Empirical Study of the Linear Structure Relationships among Self-Concepts, Teaching Beliefs, and Teaching Self-Efficacy of Physical Education Teachers at Junior High Schools

蕭秋祺

教師思考 ； 相關分析 ； 結構方程模式 ； teachers' thinking ； correlation analysis ； structural equation modeling

長榮運動休閒學刊

7期（2013 / 06 / 30）

56 - 67

繁體中文

本研究以問卷調查方式探討園中體育教師的自我概念、教學信念及其教學自我效能之關係。為達成研究目的，採自編「國中體育教師自我概念、教學信念與教學自我效能之線性結構關係分析」量表進行問卷調查，並透過分層隨機取樣方式，自全國各縣、市國民中學中抽取650位在職體育教師進行問卷施測。所得資料經主成分因素分析、積差相關分析、典型相關分析和結構方程模式分析等統計處理方法與分析後，得到重要結論，包括：第一、園中體育教師的自我概念、教學信念與其教學自我效能關係密切。第二、國中體育教師的自我概念與教學信念對其教學自我效能具有影響力。第三、國中體育教師自我概念、教學信念與教學自我效能的線性結構模式適配度佳，變項間具線性因果關係。

The purposes of this study were to investigate the relationships between self-concepts, teaching beliefs, and teaching self-efficacy of physical education teachers at junior high schools. To serve the above mentioned purposes, this study compiled and produced the Questionnaire of the Linear Structure Relationships between Self-Concepts, Teaching Beliefs, and Teaching Self-Efficacy of Physical Education Teachers at Junior High Schools. The questionnaire survey was implemented with stratified random sampling among all junior high schools nationwide. Five hundred and seventy-one physical education teachers in active service were drawn. The data extracted from the questionnaire were processed and analyzed with product- moment correlation, canonical correlation analysis, and structural equation modeling analysis. The important conclusions derived included: First, the self-concepts, teaching beliefs, and teaching self-efficacy of physical education teachers at junior high schools exhibited a high correlation. Secondly, the self-concepts and teaching beliefs in teaching of physical education teachers at junior high schools had predictability on overall teaching self-efficacy individual teaching efficacy and general teaching efficacy. Thirdly, the linear structural relation model for self-concepts, teaching beliefs, and teaching self-efficacy of physical education teachers at junior high schools has a good fit, the variables showed a linear causal relationship.

1. 蕭秋祺(2009)。國中體育教師教學信念及其有效教學表現之研究。體育學報，42(2)，49-66。
   連結：
2. Cross, K. P.(1986).Adult as Learners.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
3. Gibson, S.,Dembo, M. H.(1984).Teacher efficacy: A construct validation.Journal of Educational Psychology,76,569-582.
4. Osborn, M. D.(1998).Teacher as knower and learner: Reflections on situated knowledge in science teaching.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,35,427-439.
5. Pedhazur, E. J.(1997).Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction.Orlando, FL:Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
6. Raths, J.(2001).Teachers' Beliefs and Teaching Beliefs.Early Childhood Research & Practice: An Intern
7. Rowland, E. J.(1986).Self-concept and the educational orientations of older adult learning participants.Psychological Review,108(3),593-623.
8. Shavelson, R. J.,Stern, P.(1981).Research on teachers' pedagogical thoughts, judgments, decisions, behavior.Review of Educational Research,51(4),455-498.
9. Tabachnick, B. R.,Zeichner, K. M.(1984).,未出版
10. Witrock, M. C.Ed.(1986)。Handbook of Research on Teaching。New York:Macmillan。
11. 方吉正(1998)。教師信念研究之回顧與整合─六種研究取向。教育資料與研究，20，36-44。
12. 王恭志(2003)。教師思考歷程之班級教學評估策略。國教之友，54(3)，83-92。
13. 周麗華(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。屏東縣，國立屏東教育大學。
14. 林亨華(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺南市，國立台南師範學院。
15. 林進材(1999)。從教師教學信念與決定談教學實施與效能。中等教育，55(3)，9-21。
16. 邱皓政(2005)。量化研究與統計分析： SPSS 中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。臺北市:五南。
17. 黃光雄編(1988)。教學原理。臺北市:師大書苑。
18. 黃儒傑(2002)。博士論文(博士論文)。高雄市，國立高雄師範大學。
19. 簡紅珠(1992)。教學研究的主要派典及啟示之探析。高雄市:復文。

1. 馬雙男、林靜萍(2016)。大學體育專家教師教學信念對課堂氣氛之個案研究。臺灣運動教育學報，11(1)，15-34。