英文摘要
|
The purposes of this study were (1) to explore students' perception and beliefs on the differences between the native English speaking teachers (NESTs) and the non-native English speaking teachers (non-NESTs) and (2) to determine if students’ preference on NESTs related to their age, grades, scores, and genders. A survey questionnaire was designed to conduct this research. The participants were 357 students in a university in southern Taiwan. The results of this study were consistent with Medgyes' (2001) remarks on the bright side of non-NESTs as well as on the strengths of NESTs. In general, non-NESTs provide better learner models, offer effective method in language learning strategy, provide more information about the English language, better anticipate learners' difficulties, be more sensitive to students' needs, use Li more, and improve students' vocabulary and grammar competence more often. NESTs have more flexibility in teaching methods, are more creative and informal, focus more on fluency, prefer group work, endure students' errors more, give fewer tests, don't use students' Li to teach, and provide more cultural information. More than half of the participants believed that NESTs' teaching hours should not be adjusted and that both NESTs and non-NESTs were effective teachers. 89.9% of the participants believed that NESTs should teach speaking courses (e.g. conversation and public speech) rather than other courses (e.g. literature, linguistics, business English, listening, reading, and writing). Of all those demographical variables, grade level, and scores were associated with their preference of NESTs.
|
参考文献
|
-
TheCenter for National Education Consultation
連結:
-
Arva, V.,Medgyes, P..Native and non-native teachers in the classroom.System,28,355-372.
-
Braine, G. (Ed.)(1999).Non-Native educators in English Language Teaching.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
-
Shih-Te English teaching data bank
-
ELT Newsletter
-
Humanizing Language
-
Caves English Teaching
-
Kamhi-Stein, L.D.,G. Braine (Ed.)(1999).Non-Native Educators in English Language Teaching.New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
-
Lin, H.Y.(2005).Taipei, Taiwan,Ming-Chuan University.
-
Liu, J.(1999).Non-native-English-Speaking professionals in TESOL.TESOL,33,85-102.
-
ERIC Digest
-
McNeill.(1993).Some Characteristics of Native or Non-Native speaker Teachers of English.Papers presented at Annual International Language in Education Conference,Hong Kong, China:
-
Medgyes, P..Native or non-native: Who's worth more?.ELT Journal,46(4),340-349.
-
Medgyes, P.(1994).The Non-native Teacher.London:MacMillan.
-
Medgyes, P.,G. Braine (Ed.)(1999).Non-Native Educators in English Language Teaching.New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
-
Medgyes, P.,M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.)(2001).Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language.London:Heinle & Heinle, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc..
-
Unpublished paper from University of Northern Iowa
-
Milambiling, J.(1999).Native and Non-native Speakers: The View from Teacher Education.Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the Midwest modern language association,St. Louis, Missouri:
-
Milambiling, J.(2000).How nonnative speakers as teachers fit into the equation.TESOL Quarterly,324-328.
-
Retrieved Sep.1
-
Phillipson, R.(1992).ELT: The native speaker's burden?.ELT Journal,46(4),340-349.
-
Reves, T.,Medgyes, P.(1994).The non-native English speaking ESL/EFL teacher's self-image: An international survey.System,22(3),353-367.
-
Samimy, K.K.,Brutt-Griffler, J.,G. Braine (Ed.)(1999).Non-Native Educators in English Language Teaching.Mahwah, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
-
Student's Experience with Foreign Native Speaker English Teachers
-
'NATIVE' AND 'NON-NATIVE': not only a question of terminology. Humanising Language Teaching
-
Thomas, J.,G. Braine. (Ed.)(1999).Voices from the Periphery: Non-native Teachers and Issues of Credibility.Non-Native Educators in English Language Teaching.
-
The Language Teacher
-
TESL-EJ.
-
TESL-EJ.
|