台南市一級古蹟遊憩效益之評估

Estimation of the Recreation Benefit of Tainan First-Grade Historical Sites

10.29539/CNABH.201112.0021

董志明(Chih-Ming Dong)；何東波(Tong-Po Ho)；許淑燕(Shu-Yen Hu)；石心儀(Hsin-Yis Shih)；黃戊田(Wu-Tien Huang)

古蹟 ； 遊憩效益 ； 旅遊成本法 ； Historical Sites ； Recreation Benefit ； Travel Cost Method

嘉南學報（人文類）

37期（2011 / 12 / 01）

539 - 549

繁體中文

本研究以問卷方式對於台南市一級古蹟的遊客進行調查，調查結果經由T檢定及單因子變異數分析分析遊客的人口統計變量對總旅遊成本是否存在顯著差異，並應用「旅遊成本法」估算台南市一級古蹟的遊憩效益。在台南市一級古蹟遊憩需求實證模型上，本研究以計數模型中的TPOIS、TNB與On-Site Poisson模型來修正現場樣本的截斷與內生分層偏誤，研究結果顯示：（1）TPOIS模型及On-Site Poisson模型結果較好，較適合用來評估台南市一級古蹟的遊憩效益。（2）三模型中TPOIS模型的消費者剩餘最高，其次是TNB模型，On-Site Poisson模型最低。（3）台南市一級古蹟旅遊所帶來的年總遊憩效益約為60億元。本研究的結果將有助於未來台南市一級古蹟進行遊憩規劃或維護時，進行成本效益分析上的參考依據。

The questionnaires for analysis were collected by sampling the visitors in Tainan first-grade historical sites. The data of questionnaires investigation was analyzed using methodology of independent means T-test and one-way ANOVA. The above methodology was applied to test the differences in total travel cost according to visitor's identity. The recreation benefit of Tainan first-grade historical sites was also estimated by travel cost method. The trip demand function was constructed by different count data models, namely, Truncated Poisson (TPOIS), Truncated Negative Binomial (TNB) and On-Site Poisson. This study has found that: (1) the more appropriate models were TPOIS and On-Site Poisson to estimate recreation benefit of Tainan first-grade historical sites. (2) CS under TPOIS model was the highest, and under On-Site Poisson model was the lowest. (3) the total recreation benefits of Tainan first-grade historical sites were about NT$ 6 billion per year.

1. 李俊鴻、陳吉仲(2007)。節慶活動旅客旅遊需求及遊憩效益評估─以綠色博覽會為例。農業與經濟，39，137-166。
   連結：
2. 陳凱俐、林雲雀(2005)。不同旅遊需求函數設定下之遊憩效益比較─以宜蘭縣為例。農業與經濟，34，91-120。
   連結：
3. 鄭蕙燕、張偉祐、林政德(2000)。四草野生動物保護區遊客之遊憩效益與時間成本：截斷式撥爾生模式之應用。農業經濟半年刊，67，161-178。
   連結：
4. Huang, J.C. (2004). Exact welfare measures for a policy ban revisited. Working Paper, Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica
5. Hotelling, H. (1947). Letter to the national parks service in economic studies of outdoor recreation. Outdoor Recreation Review Commission, Washington, D.C.
6. Ciriacy-Wantrup, S.V. (1947). Capital returns from soil conservation practices. Journal of Farm Economics, 29(4), 1181-1196
7. Berstrom, J. C.,Cordell, H. K.(1991).An analysis of the demand for and value of outdoor recreation in the United States.Journal of Leisure Research,23(1),67-86.
8. Bockstael, N. E.,Strand, I. E.(1987).The effect of common sources of regression error on benefit estimation.Land Economics,63(1),11-20.
9. Cesario, F. J.,Kentsch, J. L.(1976).A recreation site demand and benefit estimation model.Regional Studies,10,97-104.
10. Clawson, M.(1959).Methods of measuring the demand for and value of outdoor recreation.Washington, D.C.:Resources for the Future Inc..
11. Davis, R. K.(1963).Recreation planning as an economic problem.Natural Resources Journal,3(3),239-249.
12. Freeman, A. M.(1993).The measurement of environmental and resource values: theory and methods.Washington, D.C.:Resource for the Future Inc..
13. Hof, J. G.,Rosenthal, D. H.(1987).Valuing the opportunity cost of travel time in recreation demand models: an application to aggregate data.Journal of leisure research,19(3),174-188.
14. Knetsch, J. L.(1963).Outdoor recreation demands and benefits.Land Economics,39(4),387-396.
15. Loomis, J. B.,Walsh, R. G.(1997).Recreation economic decisions: comparing benefits and costs.Pennsylvania:Venture Press.
16. McConnell, K. E.(1975).Some problems in estimating the demand for outdoor recreation.American Journal of Agricultural Economics,57(2),330-334.
17. Moran, D.(1994).CSERGE Working PaperCSERGE Working Paper,未出版
18. Randall, A.,Ives, B.,Eastman, C.(1974).Bidding games for valuation of aesthetic environmental improvements.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1(2),132-49.
19. Smith, V. K.(ed.)(1980).Advances in Applied Microeconomics.JAI Press Inc.
20. Walsh, R. G.,Loomis, J. B.,Gillman R. A.(1984).Valuing option, existence and bequest demand for wilderness.Land Economics,60(1),14-29.
21. 李明宗(1994)。休閒、觀光、遊憩論文集，台北:
22. 沈勤銘(2005)。基隆，國立臺灣海洋大學應用經濟研究所。
23. 張文龍(2005)。基隆，國立台灣海洋大學環境生物與漁業科學研究所。
24. 陳依筠(2005)。新竹，中華大學營建管理研究所。
25. 陳凱俐(1996)。遊憩區經濟效益評估法之應用與比較─以頭城休閒農場為例。宜蘭農工學報，12，23-39。
26. 陳凱俐、林雲雀(2004)。宜蘭縣遊憩區之遊憩效益評估。中華林學季刊，37(3)，293-302。
27. 陸雲(1990)。對環境資源估價之研究─非市場估價方法。經濟論文，18(1)，93-129。
28. 黃世賢(1998)。台中，國立中興大學都市計畫研究所。
29. 黃宗煌(1990)。台灣地區國家公園之遊憩效益的評估。臺灣銀行季刊，41(3)，282-303。
30. 黃榮賜(1988)。台中，國立中興大學都市計畫研究所。
31. 楊欣薇(2003)。台南，長榮大學土地管理與開發研究所。
32. 楊麗靜(2007)。基隆，國立台灣海洋大學環境生物與漁業科學研究所。
33. 鍾宜庭(2005)。基隆，國立臺灣海洋大學海洋資源管理研究所。

1. 闕雅文,歐淑雅(2020)。Assessment of Intangible Cultural Heritage Value of Baishatun Matsu Pilgrimage。應用經濟論叢，107，219-267。