鋼鐵線材業安全文化評估之研究

The Safety Culture Assessment of the Steel Wire Industry

莊寶宗(Pao-Tsung Chuang)；劉玉文(Yuh-When Liou)

鋼鐵線材業 ； 安全文化 ； 潛在危害 ； Steel Wire Industry ； Safety Culture ； Potential Hazards

嘉南學報（人文類）

39期（2013 / 12 / 01）

249 - 259

繁體中文

本研究旨在探討鋼鐵線材業之安全文化現況，並以問卷調查方式將研究問卷發送至作業員工數在100人以上之南部鋼鐵線材廠共10家250份，總計回收問卷207份，回收率為82.8%；獲得有效問卷186份，佔發送問卷之74.4%。採用電腦統計分析軟體SPSS 12.0版作為資料分析之工具，探討鋼鐵線材業個人背景基本資料變項與安全文化相關變項之關係、差異分析以及安全文化各面向之間的關係，最後提出該職場潛在危害及提昇產業安全文化的具體改善對策，供鋼鐵線材業之事業單位決策參考運用。本研究結果顯示，員工背景變項在整體安全文化的差異上，以「年齡」、「擔任職務」、「服務年資」出現顯著性，經分析發現年齡在50～60歲、擔任部門主管以上職務、服務年資11～20年之間的員工，具有較佳之安全文化水準。在相關分析部份，以「年齡」與整體安全文化呈現顯著相關。又「職場風險自評」、「工作環境安全衛生滿意度」與整體安全文化呈現顯著相關，分析後發現職場風險愈低、安全滿意度愈高者與安全文化之相關亦愈高。

The purpose of this study was to investigate the current safety culture for the steel wire industry , 250 copies of questionnaires were sent to ten Taiwan southern steel factories with above 100 employees individually. 207 copies of total questionnaires retrieved, the retrieved rate was 82.8%; 186 copies of documents are valided, its retrieved rate is 74.4% of the documents sent. Our study use the computer statistical analysis software SPSS 12.0 version as a tool for data analysis, and study the variables relationship between the personal background and safety culture of steel industry, differences and related variables analysis . Finally, in conclusions of the analysis, We proposed improvement solution to potential hazardous workplace for related corporate's making-decision. The results of this study was shown that the ＂age＂, ＂served position＂, ＂working period＂ of employees background have more significant relations on the entire safety culture . The analysis was found that employees with age of the 50 to 60 years old, served as the department head or working duration from 11 to 20 years, met a high level demand of safety culture. In the correlation analysis, the ＂age＂ variables significantly related to the entire safety culture. And ＂workplace risk self-assessment＂, ＂work environment safety＂ and ＂health satisfaction＂ are related to the entire safety culture significantly, the analysis was found that the lower the workplace risk, the higher safety satisfaction and safety culture.

1. ACSNI(1993).,The Human Factors Study Group of the Advisory Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations.
2. Cooper, M. D.(1998).Improving safety culture: A practical guide.England:John Wiley & Sons.
3. Cooper, M.D.(2000).Towards a model of safety culture.Safety Science,36(2),111-136.
4. Fleming, M.,Lardner, R.(1999).Safety Culture-The Way Forward.The Chemical Engineer,11,16-18.
5. Health and Safety Commission(1993).,London:HMSO.
6. Hudson, P.T.W.(2003).Understanding Safety Management in the Context of Organizational Culture.NATO/ Russia ARW, Forecasting and Preventing Catastrophes Conference
7. Petersen, D.(1996).Safety by objectives: What gets measured and rewarded gets done.New York:Van Nostrand Rrinhold.
8. Singer S. J.,Gaba, D. M.,Geppert, J. J.,Sinaiko, A. D.,Howard, S. K.,Park, K. C.(2003).The Culture of Safety: Results of an Organization-wide Survey in 15 California Hospitals.Quality and Safety in Health Care,12,112-118.
9. Stock, G. N.,McFadden, K. L.,Gowen, C. R.(2007).Organizational Culture, Critical Success Factors, and the Reduction of Hospital Errors.International Journal of Production Economics,106(2),368-392.
10. Westrum, R.(1995).Organisational dynamics and safety.Applications of psychology to the aviation system,Aldershot, UK:
11. 古承峰(2003)。國立交通大學工業工程與管理學系。
12. 李憶萱、楊鎮嘉、王怡舜(2012)。領導行為、安全文化對安全績效之影響—以護理人員為例。輔仁管理評論，19(1)，47-72。
13. 施元斌(2002)。風險分析方法於工廠之應用。工業安全科技，42，24-28。
14. 袁宇熙(2005)。南台科技大學技職教育與人力資源發展研究所。
15. 曹常成、郭建志、張祐語(2004)。行政院勞工委員會勞工安全衛生研究所行政院勞工委員會勞工安全衛生研究所,未出版
16. 許智閔(2009)。國立成功大學交通管理科學研究所。
17. 郭建志(2003)。行政院勞工安全衛生研究所委託研究報告行政院勞工安全衛生研究所委託研究報告,行政院勞工安全衛生研究所。
18. 陳冠華(2006)。行為安全推動機制之探討。工業安全科技，59，16-21。
19. 陳建安(2008)。嘉南藥理科技大學環境工程與科學系。
20. 馮楚涵(2012)。國立中央大學環境工程研究所。
21. 戴貞德、梁明全(2011)。應用DEA評估台灣板鋼廠之經營績效。商業現代化學刊，6(2)，151-169。
22. 謝明瑞(2001)。,財團法人國家政策基金會。