國民小學健康促進學校推動團隊推動現況及團體效能影響因素之探討

A Study of Health Promoting Woekteams' Group Efficacy and Related Factors in Taiwanese Elementary Schools

10.7022/JHPHE.200906.0101

晏涵文(Han-Wen Yen)；劉潔心(Chieh-Hsing Liu)；牛玉珍(Yu-Zhen Niu)；邱詩揚(Shy-Yang Chiou)

健康促進學校 ； 團隊 ； 團體效能 ； 階層迴歸分析 ； health promoting school ； work team ； collective efficacy ； hierarchical regression

健康促進與衛生教育學報

31期（2009 / 06 / 01）

101 - 127

繁體中文

The aim of this study is to explore the influences factors of health promoting workteam's collective efficacy of all elementary schools in Taiwan. The probability proportional sampling according various school sizes was used in this study to select faculty from all health promoting schools participated in 2007. 497 questionnaires were distributed in 26 selected schools and 468 questionnaires were returned with a response rate of 86.32%. Finally, 468 valid questionnaires were used in further analysis. The results have showed that input factors (individual factor, organizational factor, resources factor) indirectly related to collective efficacy through process factor (group interaction) and process factor directly related to collective efficacy. There were significant predictors for collective efficacy, accounting 67.3% variances. Only input factor were significant predictors for collective efficacy, accounting 52.8% variances. We hope the result can be the reference for schools to establish health polices and to develop action plan to cooperatively resolve the health problem.

The aim of this study is to explore the influences factors of health promoting workteam's collective efficacy of all elementary schools in Taiwan. The probability proportional sampling according various school sizes was used in this study to select faculty from all health promoting schools participated in 2007. 497 questionnaires were distributed in 26 selected schools and 468 questionnaires were returned with a response rate of 86.32%. Finally, 468 valid questionnaires were used in further analysis. The results have showed that input factors (individual factor, organizational factor, resources factor) indirectly related to collective efficacy through process factor (group interaction) and process factor directly related to collective efficacy. There were significant predictors for collective efficacy, accounting 67.3% variances. Only input factor were significant predictors for collective efficacy, accounting 52.8% variances. We hope the result can be the reference for schools to establish health polices and to develop action plan to cooperatively resolve the health problem.

1. 黃松元、陳政友、賴香如(2004)。學校衛生工作新模式－健康促進學校。學校衛生，45，59-72。
   連結：
2. 黃淑貞、徐美玲、莊苹、姜逸群、陳曉玟、邱雅莉(2005)。台灣地區國小實施健康促進學校現況之研究。學校衛生，46，1-23。
   連結：
3. Improvement of Health- Promoting Schools, Journal of School Health, The Provided by ProQuest Information and Learning
4. Bandura, A.(1997).Self-efficacy the exercise of control.U.S.A.:W. H. Freeman and Company.
5. Barrick, M. R.,Stewart, G. L.,Neubert, M. J.,Mount, M. K.(1998).Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness.Journal of Applied Psychology,83(3),377-391.
6. Campion, M. A.,Medsker, G. J.,Higgs, A. C.(1993).Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups.Personnel Psychology,46,823-825.
7. Campion, M. A.,Papper, E. M.,Medsker, G. J.(1996).Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension.Personnel Psychology,49,429-452.
8. Cohen, S. G.,Bailey, D. E.(1997).What makes team work? Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite.Journal of Management,23,239-290.
9. Dehran Swart,Priscilla Reddy.(1999).Establishing Networks for Health Promoting Schools in South Africa.Journal of School Health,69,47-50.
10. Deschesnes, M.,Martin, C.,Hill, A. J.(2003).Comprehensive approaches to school health promotion: how to achieve broader implementation.Health Promotion International,18,387-396.
11. Dooris, M.(1999).Healthy Cities and Local Agenda 21: The UK Experience-Challenges for the New Millennium.Health Promotion International,14(4),365-375.
12. Early, P. C.,Mosakowski, E.(2000).Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning.Academy of Management Journal,43(1),26-29.
13. Forsyth, D. R.(1990).Group dynamics.Pacific Grove, CA:Brooks/Cole.
14. Gist, M. E.,Locke, E. A.,Taylor, M. S.(1987).Organinizational Behavior: Group Structure, Process, and Effectiveness.Journal of Management,13(2),237-257.
15. Gladstein, D. L.(1984).Groups in Context: A Model of Task Group Effectiveness.Administrative Science Quarterly,29,499-517.
16. Hackman, J. R.(1983).A Normative Model of Work Team Effectiveness.New Haven, CT:Yale University.
17. Hoyle, Tena B.,Samek, Beverly B.,Valois, Robert F.(2008).Building Capacity for the Continuous Improvement of Health-Promotion Schools.Journal of School Health,78,1-8.
18. Hyatt, D. E.,Ruddy, T. M.(1997).An examination of the relationship between work group caharacteristics and performance: Once more into the breech.Personnel Psychology,50,553-585.
19. Inchley, J.,Muldoon, J.,Currie, C.(2006).Becoming a health promoting school: evaluating the process of effective implementation in Scotland.Health Promotion International,22,65-71.
20. Jernsen, B. B.(1997).A case of two paradigms within health education.Health Education Research,12,419-428.
21. Katherine, W.(1998).First workshop of evaluation of the Health Promoting models, experiences and perspectives in Switzerland: 19-22 November 1998.
22. National Health and Medical Research Council(1996).Effective School Health Promotion.Canberra:Australian Government Publishing Service.
23. Salas, E.,R. W. Swezey(eds.),E. Salas(eds.)(1992).Teams: Their Training and Perforrmance.Norwood, NT:Ablex Publishing Corporation.
24. Schwarz, R.(1994).The Skilled Facilitator: Practical Wisdom for Developing Effeive Groups.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
25. Simovska, V.(2004).Student participation: a democratic education perspective-experience from the health-promoting schools in Macedonia.Health Education Research,19,198-207.
26. Song, X. M.,Montoya-Weiss,Schmidt, J. B.(1997).Antecedents andconsequences of cross-functional cooperation: A comparison of R&D, manufacturing, and marketing perspectives.Journal of ProductionInnovation Management,14,35-47.
27. Springett, J.(1998).Practical Guidance on evaluating health promotion.Paper given at the WHO Integrated Health Development Confernce
28. St. John, C. H.,Rue, L. W.(1991).Co-ordinating mechanisms, consensus between marketing and manufacturing groups, and marketplace performance.Strategic Management Journal,12,549-555.
29. Stewart, G. L.,Manz, C.C.,Sims, H. P.(1999).Team work and group dynamics.New York:Wiley.
30. Tesluk, P. E.,Mathieu, J. E.(1999).Overcoming roadblocks to effectiveness: Incorporating management of performance barriers into models of work group effectiveness.Journal of Applied Psychology,84,200-217.
31. WHO(1998).WHO's Global School Health Initiative-Helping Schools to Become "Health-Promoting Schools".Fact Sheet,92
32. The Bangkok Charter for Health Promotion in a Globalized World
33. WHO(1997).Report of a WHO Expert Committee on Comprehensive School Health Education and Promotion.Typeset in Hong Kong:Printed in Spain.
34. 李弘暉(1997)。高績效團隊管理的理論基礎－團隊理論模型綜述。中國行政評論，6，87-104。
35. 李弘暉(1996)。公共組織的全面品質管理空大行政學報，6，407-440。
36. 李弘暉(1998)。公共組織的高績效團隊－美國俄亥俄州「高績效團隊獎」之個案研究。空大行政學報，8，365-400。
37. 李紹鴻、李大拔、李大拔編著(2002)。健康促進學校香港經驗分享。香港:香港中文大學。
38. 張麗春、黃松元(2004)。從健康促進學校的觀點談學校與社區伙伴關係建立。護理雜誌，52，76-81。
39. 郭鐘隆(2005)。推動學校本位的健康促進學校。台灣教育，634，14-19。
40. 陳毓璟(2001)。健康促計學校的發展與推動。學校衛生，39，40-62。
41. 黃敏萍(2000)。博士論文(博士論文)。台北，國立台灣大學商學研究所。
42. 劉潔心(2004)。推動健康促進學校中程計畫事前規劃之工作計畫-2005-2008。健康促進學校行動方案成果報告。
43. 劉潔心(2008)。97-98年度健康促進學校推動中心計畫。行政院衛生署國民健康局計畫書。

1. 黃俐婷(2017)。學校班級導師對於兒童早期發展之連結服務研究。社會發展研究學刊，19，1-20。
2. 劉潔心(2013)。臺灣推動健康促進學校之現況與展望。中等教育，64(1)，6-25。
3. 劉潔心、陳政友、邱詩揚、牛玉珍(2014)。健康促進國小建立家庭夥伴關係影響因素研究。臺灣公共衛生雜誌，33(3)，290-303。
4. 劉潔心、晏涵文、邱詩揚、牛玉珍(2010)。健康促進學校推動團隊領導方式、集體效能與團體效果之現況及關係模式驗證－以台灣小學為例。臺灣公共衛生雜誌，29(3)，247-260。