男子競技體操裁判員判分準確性之探討

Analysis of the Accuracy for Judging Men's Artistic Gymnastics at the International Competition

10.6194/SCS.2004.04.27

蔡恆政(Heng-Cheng Tsai)；林永錫(Yung-His Lin)；莊智雄(Chi-Shiung Chuan)；史瑞臨(Jui-Lin Shin)

第Ⅲ競賽 ； 裁判員評分 ； 評分準確性 ； individual scores for each apparatus ； judges' evaluation ； accuracy of evaluation

教練科學

4期（2004 / 08 / 01）

289 - 296

繁體中文

本研究之主要目的為瞭解2002年世界盃男子競技體操第Ⅲ競賽六個項目裁判員間評審分數之凖確性，藉以提國內競技體操裁判員、教練與選手參考，並作為往後訓練或比賽之應用。本研究是以參加2002年世界盃男子競技體操第Ⅲ競賽之B組各36位裁判員為研究對象，針對裁判員原始評分資料以肯德爾和諧系數(Kendall coefficient of concordance)、相依樣本單因子變異數(ANOVA)及皮爾遜(K. pearson)積差相關進行統計分析，所得結論為： 一、跳馬項目裁判員評分具有客觀一致性，且能有效評定出參賽選手優劣，準確性極高。 二、地板、鞍馬、吊環、雙槓、單槓等，五個項目裁判員評分雖然具有客觀一致性，但卻無法有效分辨出參賽選手好壞，凖確性較低。

The primary objective of this investigation was to examine the accuracy of evaluation in thea' gymnastics performance and the technical execution by B panel in the men's artistic gymnastics competitions at the World Championship in 2002 Using the Kendall coefficient of concordance, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the Pearson product-moment correlation to analyze the original data of individual scores for each apparatus, respectively The results were as follows: (1) The judges' evaluation in vault were objectively, and concordantly and can precisely differentiate the levels of gymnasts' exercise-performing skills (2) The judges' evaluation in floor, pommel horse, ring, parallel bars, and horizontal bar were objectively and concordantly, but can't precisely differentiate the levels of gymnasts' exercise-performing skills. Results of the investigation can serve as references for training the judges, coaches and gymnasts of the men's artistic gymnastics.

1. Ansorge, C.J.,Scheer, J.K.(1988).International Bias Detected, in Judging Gymnastic Competition at the 1984 Olympic Olympic Games.Research Quart-erly For Exercise and Sport,59(2),103-107.
2. Ansorge, C.J.,Scheer, J.K.,Howard, J.(1978).Bias in judging Women's Gymnastics Induced by Expectations of Within-Team Order.Research Quarterly,49(4),399-405.
3. Lee, T. D.,Ste-Marie, D. M.(1991).Prior Processing Effects on Gymnastic juding.Journal Of Experimental Psychology: Learing, Memory, and Cognition,17(1),126-136.
4. Ste-Marie, D. M.(2000).Expertise in Women's Gymnastic Judging An Observational approach.Perceptual and motor skills,90,543-546.
5. 林清和(1981)。中華民國64年與67年台灣區運動會裁判評審分數客觀性比較研究。體育學報，3，107-141。
6. 顏智淵(1997)。第廿二屆台灣區運動會韻律體橾比賽栽判員評分一致性之探討。國立體育學院論叢，7(2)，95-114。
7. 鐘明寶(2000)。第34屆世界體操錦標賽單項決現象透視。天津體育學院學報，15(3)，73-75。

1. 陳嘉遠、張至滿(2004)。跳馬項目不同起評分與實施減分對競賽成績影響之分析。文化體育學刊 ，2，285-298。
2. 陳嘉遠、張至滿(2005)。吊環競賽不同起評分與實施減分對成績影響之研究。大專體育學刊，7(3)，229-243。
3. 張秀卿(2006)。2005年世界大學運動會女子競技體操地板競賽不同起評分與實施減分對競賽成績影響暨動作分析與比較之研究。嘉南學報（人文類），32，715-730。