英文摘要
|
The ”unsanitary Chinese” was a topic widely discussed by both Chinese and foreigners in modem times, and was subject to constant debate. This paper revolves around three aspects of the topic. First, the ”unsanitary Chinese” seen as the origin of the plague and the introduction of modern bacteriology. Second, the amelioration of unsanitary sights in the foreign Settlement and the reform of Chinese society. And third, the feelings of cultural superiority, nationalistic claims, and struggles for sovereignty that appeared during these debates. From the opening of the treaty ports in 1842, foreigners were deeply worried about the high rate of disease and mortality among foreigners in China. Through the scientific observations of professional doctors, the application of demographic research, and the introduction of the modern bacteriology, the foreigners believed it was the ”unsanitary Chinese” who caused epidemics, and Chinese elites subsequently accepted this view. With the development of urban public sanitation reform in the International Settlement, a sharp contrast emerged with the ”unsanitary” Chinese communities, which stimulated Chinese elites to contemplate the backwardness of their own society, advocate the emulation of foreign sanitary institutions, and promote the political reform and enlightenment of Chinese communities. In the context of an expanding system of colonialism and imperialism, foreign narratives of ”unsanitary Chinese” and related notions cultural superiority also provoked a sense of nationalism among Chinese elites.
In addition, the foreign municipality sought to assert authority over sanitation in the Chinese-run parts of Shanghai in the name of good hygiene, which further prompted Chinese leaders to emphasize the development of hygiene to maintain Chinese sovereignty. In this sense, narratives related to ”unsanitary Chinese” were complex and diverse. Although it was a product of cultural discrimination and national oppression, the foreigners’ narrative promoted the introduction of Western and modem concepts of public hygiene into China and helped to improve local sanitary conditions. However, the Chinese elites' acceptance of the narrative of the ”unsanitary Chinese” was not a simple internalization and regurgitation of the hegemonic colonial discourse but rather involved a re-cognition, re-meditation, and re-criticism of their own society as well as of colonialism. The Chinese narrative thus inevitably included the introduction, acceptance, and imagination of a new culture. Although differences between Chinese and foreigners often resulted in competition and conflict, the historical intertwining of foreign and Chinese narratives also initiated and promoted the modern development of Chinese hygiene.
|
参考文献
|
-
雷祥麟(2004)。衛生為何不是保衛生命?民國時期另類的衛生、自我與疾病。台灣社會研究季刊,54,17-59。
連結:
-
(1936)。公共衛生月刊。1(10),37-52。
-
(1979)。清末籌備立憲檔案史料。北京:中華書局。
-
(1905)。東方雜誌,10,194-199。
-
(1902)。萬國公報。165
-
上海檔案館館藏工部局衛生處檔案
-
上海檔案館館藏工部局衛生處檔案
-
(1905)。東方雜誌,9,80-86。
-
(1926).The National Medical Journal
-
(1936)。海外通訊。金陵女子文理學院校刊,55,5-6。
-
The North-China Herald
-
上海檔案館館藏工部局衛生處檔案
-
(1904)。時報
-
上海檔案館館藏工部局衛生處檔案
-
申報
-
(1905)。東方雜誌,8,156-157。
-
(1896)。萬國公報。93
-
Arnold, David.(1993).State Medicine and Epidemic Disease in Nineteenth-Century India..Berkeley:University of California Press.
-
Balme, Harold(1921).A Study n Medical Missionary Development.London:
-
Benedict, Carol.(1996).Bubonic Plague in Nineteenth-Century China.Stanford:Stanford University Press.
-
Bynum(1994).Science and the Practice of Medicine in the Nineteenth Century.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
-
Cell, John W(1985).Anglo-Indian Medical Theory and the Origins of Segregation in West Africa.American History Review 90:3,307-335.
-
Christie, Dugald(1914).Thirty Years in Moukden,1883-1913.
-
Coltman, Robert.(1891).Their Present and Future: Medical..
-
Curtin. Philip(1986).Medical Knowledge and Urban Planning in Tropical Africa.American History Review 91:2. April 1986,594-613.
-
Henderson, James.(1883).
-
Lockhart, William.(1861).A Narrative of Twenty Years Experience..
-
Macpherson(1987).The Origins of Public Health in Shanghai,1843-1893.
-
Ramasubban, Radhika.(1980).Oxford:Clarendon Press.
-
Rogaski, Ruth(2000).Hygienic Modernity in Tianjing.Modernity and National Identity
-
Rogaski, Ruth.(2004).Hygienic Modernity Meanings of Health and Disease in Treaty-Port China. Berkeley.London:University of California Press.
-
Shah, Nayan.(2001).Epidemics and Race in San Francisco`s Chinatown.Berkeley and Los Angeles:University of California Press.
-
Wu, Lien-The(1934).
-
Wu, Lien-The(1934).Medical Progress in China since the Republic,1912-1932.
-
Yip, Ka-che.(1995).The Development of Modern Health Services,1928-1937.
-
中島端氏(1962)。支那分割之運命駁議。上海:圖書館。
-
王士雄(1997)。中國醫學大成。北京:中國中醫藥出版社。
-
王韜(1989)。灜壖雜誌。1
-
伍連德、伯力士、陳永漢、伍長耀(1934)。霍亂概論。上海:海港檢疫管理處。
-
任建樹、張統模(1993)。陳獨秀著作選。1
-
匡守動(1885)。疏浚內城河有碑記。丹陽縣志•藝文,33
-
余新忠(2006)。社會文化視野下的中國疾病醫療史國際學術研討會會議。天津:
-
余新忠(2001)。清人對瘟疫的認識初探-以江南地區為中心。中國社會歷史評論,3
-
吳桂龍(1998)。論晚清上海外僑人口的變遷。史林,4,67-74。
-
李尚仁。歷史語言研究所集刊。
-
李達嘉(2002)。第一回中國史學國際會議研究報告集:中國の歷史世界―統合のシステムと多元的發展―。東京:都立大学出版会。
-
李維清(1989)。上海鄉土志。上海:古籍出版社。
-
汪敬虞(1957)。中國近代工業史資料(1895-1914)。北京:科學出版社。
-
阮篤成(1936)。租界制度與上海公共租界。上海:法雲書屋。
-
周武、吳桂龍(1999)。晚清社會。上海通史,5
-
林起龍(1979)。嚴飭官箴疏。近代中國史料叢刊,19
-
阿英(1962)。反美華工禁約文學集。北京:中華書局。
-
姚公鶴(1989)。上海閒話。上海:古籍出版社。
-
姚賢鎬(1962)。中國近代對外貿易史資料。北京:中華書局。
-
夏東元(1982)。鄭觀應集。上海:人民出版社。
-
孫寶瑄(1983)。忘山廬日記。上海:古籍出版社。
-
徐雪筠、張仲禮(1985)。近代上海社會經濟發展概況(海關十年報告譯編1882•1931)。上海:社會科學出版社。
-
納富介次郎(2001)。千歲九上海行―日本人一八六二年的中國觀察。北京:商務印書館。
-
馬七(2000)。中華帝國主義對外關係史。1
-
梁其姿(2003)。麻風隔雕與近代中國。歷史研究,5,1-14。
-
梅朋、傳立德(1983)。上海法租界史。上海:譯文出版社。
-
陸文雪(1999)。中國近代城市發展與社會經濟。上海:社會科學出版社。
-
傅蕳雅、應祖錫(2002)。佐治芻言。上海:書店出版社。
-
程愷禮(1988)。上海研究論叢。上海:社會科學院出版社。
-
費成康(1991)。中國租界史。上海:社會季神學院出版社。
-
飯島涉(2000)。ぺストと卜七近代中國―衛生の`制度化` と社會變容。東京:研文出版社。
-
黃式權(1989)。淞南夢影錄。
-
鄒依仁(1980)。舊上海人口變遷的研究。上海:人民出版社。
-
熊月之(2003)。上海的外國人(l842-1949)。上海:古籍出版社。
-
蒯世動(1980)。上海公共租界史搞。上海:人民出版社。
-
鄭祖安(1999)。百年上海城。上海:學林出版社。
-
顏清湟(1990)。出國華工與清朝官員:晚清時期中國對海外華人的保護。北京:中國友誼出版公司。
-
羅森、王曉秋點、史鵬(1983)。早期日本遊記五種。長沙:湖南人民出版社。
|