题名

西化哲學家張東蓀及其折衷論論證析義

并列篇名

An Analysis of Chang Tung-sun's Westernized Thought with Special Reference to His Arguments for Eclecticism

DOI

10.6353/BIMHAS.201009.0079

作者

葉其忠(Key-Chong Yap)

关键词

張東蓀 ; 折衷論 ; 西化哲學家 ; Chang Tung-sun ; eclecticism ; westernized philosopher

期刊名称

近代史研究所集刊

卷期/出版年月

69期(2010 / 09 / 01)

页次

79 - 125

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

張東蓀的西化哲學裡有無處不在的折衷論。這個特色是與Charles Moore所總結、令人生畏的二十一大點中國思想特徵,尤其是與第十三、第十四點關於中國折衷論的描繪一致的。 張東蓀思想中西化性質可以分三個層次來處理。第一個層次,是關於他讀過的西文書,這是最無爭議但比較不深刻的證成法。第二個層次,是關於他費力從事於「介紹」,或比較正確地說,改換西方觀念、信條和學派以適應中國的環境和需要。第三個層次,是關於他基於對這些有所改變的西方觀念、信條和學派而企圖建立和鼓吹的哲學體系。 本文在介紹了張東蓀哲學裡無疑的西化特色或西化性質後,將會集中在其中的折衷論。在張東蓀的眼中,折衷論確是處理中、西方哲學、思想與文化交往時比較理想或可取的態度、步驟、方法和原則。他為了折衷常不得不斷改變看法,而看法若改變了,也不得不加以折衷。 基於把張東蓀看成可能是「最西化的」現代中國哲學家或思想家的論斷,本文的目的,即是要進一步詳細展示,張東蓀的折衷論到底可以證成至何等程度。

英文摘要

Eclecticism is ubiquitous in the highly westernized philosophy of Chang Tung-sun [Zhang Dongsun]. This feature is in accord with the thirteenth and fourteenth points about Chinese eclecticism as enumerated by Charles Moore in his formidable list of twenty-one notable features of Chinese thought. The westernized character of Chang's thought can be dealt with on three levels. The first level concerns western books he read (or even merely consulted), which rests on a straight-forward but superficial methodology. The second level concerns his strenuous efforts to ”introduce” western thought, or more properly speaking, his transformation of western ideas, doctrines, and schools of thought for the sake of meeting China's environment and needs. The third level is closely related to Chang's establishment and advocacy of philosophical systems on the basis of such a heroic transformation. After having dealt with the undoubted westernized character in Chang's philosophy, this article then focuses on his eclecticism as the crux of his whole thought. From Chang's point of view, eclecticism is itself an ideal or preferable attitude, approach, method, and principle for dealing with the intercourse between Chinese and western philosophies, thought, and cultures. This article highlights how, to fulfill this ideal, Chang consistently had to change his views, which in turn affected his eclecticism in an open-ended way throughout his life. Taking seriously the argument that Chang probably was ”the most westernized” Chinese thinker of his day, this article is designed to examine precisely how his eclecticism was central to his philosophy.

主题分类 人文學 > 歷史學
参考文献
  1. 葉其忠(1999)。張東蓀生卒年記載誤差之省思:歷史事實與歷史解釋關係間的一個小個案。中央研究院近代史研究所集刊,31,217-257。
    連結:
  2. 葉其忠(2001)。張東蓀是何意義的「唯心主義者」?—張東蓀的「唯心主義者」標籤及其自評析論。中央研究院近代史研究所集刊,35,67-143。
    連結:
  3. 張東蓀,〈答張抱冰君關於哲學三問〉,《天津大公報:現代思潮》,期31,1932 年4 月23 日,星期六,第8 版。
  4. 張東蓀,《知識與文化》。上海:商務印書館,1946
  5. 張東蓀,《思想與社會》。上海:商務印書館,1946
  6. 張東蓀譯,《柏拉圖對話集六種》。上海:商務印書館,1933
  7. Schiller, F. C. S. Must Philosophers Disagree?: And Other Essays in Popular Philosophy. London: Macmillan, 1934
  8. 張東蓀,《道德哲學》。上海:中華書局,1931
  9. 張東蓀,《科學與哲學─一名從我的觀點批評科玄論戰》。北京:商務印書館,1924
  10. 北溟(張東蓀),〈宇宙觀與人生觀─我所獻議的一種(上)〉,《東方雜誌》,卷25號7,1928年4月10日,頁53-68
  11. 張東蓀,〈條理、範疇與設準〉,《哲學評論》,卷4期2-4,1931-1933
  12. Chan, Wing-tsit(陳榮捷). “Trends in Contemporary Philosophy.” In Harley Farnsworth MacNair, ed., China. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1946
  13. 張東蓀,《認識論》。上海:世界書局,1934
  14. 北溟(張東蓀),〈新實在論的論理主義〉,《東方雜誌》,卷19號17,1922年9月10日,頁15-34
  15. 張東蓀編,《唯物辯證法論戰》。北平:民友書局,1934
  16. 賀麟,《當代中國哲學》。南京:勝利出版社,1945
  17. 葉青(任卓宣),《張東蓀哲學批判─對觀念論、二元論、折衷論之檢討》,收入批判叢書乙編第二種,二冊。上海:辛墾書店,1934
  18. Chang, C. Y. trans. Epistemological Pluralism. No Publisher, No Place of Publication, 1932
  19. 張東蓀,〈多元認識論重述〉,收入胡適、蔡元培、王雲五編,《張菊生先生七十生日紀念論文集》。上海:商務印書館,1937
  20. Russell, Bertrand. “James' Conception of Truth.” In Philosophical Essays. London: Longmans, 1910
  21. 張東蓀,《哲學》。上海:世界書局,1931
  22. 張東蓀,〈從中國言語構造上看中國哲學〉,收入氏著,《知識與文化》,附錄二。上海:商務印書館,1946
  23. 張東蓀,《現代倫理學》。上海:新月書店,1932
  24. 張東蓀,《民主主義與社會主義》。上海:觀察社,1948
  25. 詹文滸編,《張東蓀的多元認識論及其批評》。上海:世界書局,1936
  26. 郭湛波,《近五十年中國思想史》。北平:人文書店,1936
  27. Adler, Mortimer J.(1985).Ten Philosophical Mistakes.New York:Macmillan.
  28. Adler, Mortimer J.(1981).Six Great Ideas.New York:Collier Books.
  29. Adler, Mortimer J.,Max Weismann, Max(ed.)(2001).How to Think about the Great Ideas: From the Greek Books of Western Civilization.Chicago:Open Court.
  30. Boorman, Howard L.(ed.)(1967).Biographical Dictionary of Republican China.New York:Columbia University Press.
  31. Boorman, Howard L.(ed.)(1967).Biographical Dictionary of Republican China.New York:Columbia University Press.
  32. Boorman, Howard L.(ed.)(1967).Biographical Dictionary of Republican China.New York:Columbia University Press.
  33. Boorman, Howard L.(ed.)(1967).Biographical Dictionary of Republican China.New York:Columbia University Press.
  34. Boorman, Howard L.(ed.)(1967).Biographical Dictionary of Republican China.New York:Columbia University Press.
  35. Brière, S. J. O.(1956).Fifty Years of Chinese Philosophy: 1898-1950.London:George Allen & Unwin.
  36. Chan、 Wing-tsit(trans. comp.)(1963).A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
  37. Chi, Wen-shun(1986).Ideological Conflicts in Modern China: Democracy and Authoritarianism.New Brunswick:Transaction Books.
  38. Cohen, Morris R.,Nagel, Ernest(1972).An Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method.London:Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd..
  39. Delfgaauw, Bernard,Smith, N. D.(trans.)(1969).Twentieth Century Philosophy.Dublin:Gill.
  40. Dillon, John M.(ed.),Long, A. A.(ed.)(1996).The Question of "Eclecticism": Studies in Later Greek Philosophy.Berkeley:University of California Press.
  41. Fung, Yu-lan(1958).A Short History of Chinese Philosophy.New York:The Macmillan Company.
  42. Hampshire, S.(ed.)(1956).The Age of Reason: The Seventeenth Century Philosophers.New York:The New American Library of World Literature.
  43. Hare, R. M.(1982).Plato.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  44. Hare, R. M.、李日章譯(1984)。柏拉圖。台北:聯經出版事業股份有限公司。
  45. Kekes, John(1980).The Nature of Philosophy.Oxford:Basil Blackwell.
  46. Kekes, John(1993).The Morality of Pluralism.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
  47. Levenson, Joseph R.(1958).Confucian China and Its Modern Fate: The Problem of Intellectual Continuity.Berkeley:University of California Press.
  48. Mill, J. S.,Stillinger, Jack(ed.)(1971).Autobiography.London:Oxford University Press.
  49. Moore, Charles A.(ed.)(1967).The Chinese Mind: Essentials of Chinese Philosophy and Culture.Honolulu:The University of Hawaii Press.
  50. Moore, Charles A.(ed.)(1962).Philosophy and Culture: East-West Philosophy in Practical Perspective.Honolulu:The University of Hawaii Press.
  51. Needham, Joseph(1956).Science and Civilization in China.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  52. Popper, Karl(1968).Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge.New York:Harper & Row.
  53. Reese, William L.(ed.)(1996).Dictionary of Philosophy and Religion.Atlantic Highlands:Humanities Press.
  54. Rescher, Nicholas(1995).Pluralism: Against the Demand for Consensus.Oxford:Clarendon Press.
  55. Rosen, Stanley(1985).The Limits of Analysis.New Haven:Yale University Press.
  56. Russell, Bertrand(1955).History of Western Philosophy.London:George Allen & Unwin.
  57. Russell, Bertrand(1961).An Outline of Philosophy.London:George Allen & Unwin.
  58. Schilpp, Paul Arthur(ed.)(1974).The Philosophy of Karl Popper.La Salle:The Open Court Publishing Co..
  59. Tan, Chester C.(1971).Chinese Political Thought in the Twentieth Century.Garden City, New York:Doubleday & Company.
  60. Wang, Gungwu(1977).China and the World since 1949: The Impact of Independence, Modernity, and Revolution.London:The Macmillan Press.
  61. West, Philip(1976).Yenching University and Sino-Western Relations, 1916-1952.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
  62. Whitehead, Alfred North(1985).Symbolism: Its Meaning and Effect.New York:Fordham University Press.
  63. Yap, Key-chong(1991).Oxford,Oriental Institute.
  64. 左玉河(1999)。張東蓀生平及思想成為學術界研究的熱點—近年來中國大陸的張東蓀研究綜述。中國文哲研究所通訊,9(2),145-161。
  65. 左玉河(1998)。張東蓀傳。濟南:山東人民出版社。
  66. 左玉河(1999)。張東蓀哲學思想的淵源。中國文哲研究所通訊,9(2),109-143。
  67. 克柔編(2000)。張東蓀學術文化隨筆。北京:中國青年出版社。
  68. 李約瑟、陳立夫主譯、陳維綸譯述、劉崇鋐譯述、程滄波譯述、端木愷譯述、陳舜政譯述(1989)。中國之科學與文明。台北:台灣商務印書館。
  69. 狄百瑞、李弘祺譯(1983)。中國的自由傳統。台北:聯經出版事業股份有限公司。
  70. 東海大學哲學系編譯(1984)。中國人的心靈。台北:聯經出版事業股份有限公司。
  71. 殷鼎(1991)。馮友蘭。台北:東大圖書出版公司。
  72. 張汝倫編(2002)。詩的哲學史—張東蓀詠西哲詩本事注。桂林:廣西師範大學出版社。
  73. 張東蓀(1979)。新哲學論叢。台北:天華出版社。
  74. 張耀南(1998)。張東蓀。台北:東大圖書股份有限公司。
  75. 張灝、高力克譯、王躍譯(2006)。危機中的中國知識分子:尋求秩序與意義。北京:新星出版社。
  76. 陳榮捷編、楊儒賓譯、吳有能譯、朱榮貴譯、萬法先譯(1993)。中國哲學文獻選編。台北:巨流圖書公司。
  77. 斯賓諾莎、賀麟譯(2005)。倫理學。北京:商務印書館。
  78. 馮友蘭、涂又光譯。中國哲學簡史。台中:藍燈文化事業股份有限公司。
  79. 漢姆普西耳, S編、陳嘉明譯(1989)。理性的時代:十七世紀哲學家。北京:光明日報出版社。
  80. 蔡尚思主編,朱維錚編(1986)。中國現代思想史資料簡編。杭州:浙江人民出版社。
  81. 謝扶雅(1976)。懷念張東蓀先生。傳記文學,29(6),91-94。
  82. 懷特海, A. N.、周邦憲譯(2007)。宗教的形成符號的意義及效果。貴陽:貴州人民出版社。
  83. 羅素、正中書局編審委員會譯(1971)。哲學大綱。台北:正中書局。
  84. 羅榮渠主編(1990)。從「西化」到現代化—五四以來有關中國的文化趨向和發展道路論爭文選。北京:北京大學出版社。
被引用次数
  1. 劉蔚之(2018)。以教育實現人格自由:教育學者瞿世英在近代中國教育史上的意義(1917-1949)。教育研究集刊,64(2),1-42。
  2. (2020)。漢字思維的哲學思考──張東蓀的方法論反思。文與哲,37,193-228。
  3. (2023)。在中國思考“本體”:以熊十力、張東蓀的對話爲線索。人文中國學報,36,299-339。