境隨心轉：服務隨創中的認知轉移與資源轉換

On Second Thought: Cognitive Shift and Resource Conversion within Service Bricolage

10.3966/199687602020081302001

蕭瑞麟(Ruey-Lin Hsiao)；徐嘉黛(Chia-Tai Hsu)

劣勢創新 ； 相對性思維 ； 資源二元性 ； 資源轉換 ； 隨創 ； adversary innovation ； duality ； resource conversion ； relativity cogitation ； bricolage

組織與管理

13卷2期（2020 / 08 / 01）

1 - 51

繁體中文

資源有限時企業何以創新？劣勢創新文獻認為，重新拼湊稀少資源或是以象徵性行動取得合法性，便能隨手拈來皆是創意。前者的邏輯是以少為多，重組手邊資源；後者的邏輯則是無中生有，借力他人資源。目前研究雖探討到少資源與無資源的議題，兩者卻皆未觸及劣資源的狀況。若行動者手邊僅有劣質資源，又面臨制約時，如何方能發展解決方案？這是當前理論面臨的瓶頸，也是實務遭遇的挑戰。要突破此議題，需由認知轉移與資源轉換著手，從「轉念」理解行動者何以解讀制約與巧用資源。本研究分析星野集團如何翻轉日本奧入瀨溪流（Orase-keiryu）酒店，探索該公司如何轉變對制約的認知，繼而轉換看似不佳的資源，重新組合出新服務。學理上，本研究延伸隨創理論，點出制約相對性與資源二元性兩項新觀念，分析行動者如何以相對性思維來解讀制約，促成認知轉移而找出扭轉契機，及以文化特性重新形塑資源的性質，發展出創意的服務。實務上，本研究拓展隨創的作法，點出行動者遇困境時若能以轉念重新定義制約，便可使阻力轉為助力；藉由文化可塑性改變資源性質，進而轉變資源價值。如此，企業便無需囿限於困境之中，而能在制約中察覺機會、轉換劣資源，並促成深具魅力的服務。

How may we innovate with limited resources? The literature of adversary innovation suggests that making-do of scare resources, or using symbolic action to build legitimacy, could improvise creative resolutions. ＂Less is more＂ is the logic of the former, by recombining handy resources; and the latter assumes another logic of ＂creating something from nothing＂, by leveraging the resources of others. However, the current research has explored the issue of resource scarcity and resource deficiency, but neither of them has touched the matter of ＂inferior resources＂. If social actors only behold inferior resources, how they may develop solutions from various constraints. This is a theoretical bottleneck as well as a practical challenge. To attempt a breakthrough of this issue, our investigation commences with social actors' cognitive shift, to understand how they interpret constraints and make creative use of resources. This research analyzes how Hoshino Group turnarounds Orase-keiryu Resort in Japan and explores how the team transforms their cognitive understanding of constraints, while converting seemingly unpromising resources, thereby recombining them to develop new services. Theoretically, this research extends the theory of bricolage and recapitulates two new concepts: the relativity of constraint and the duality of resource. This article explains how social actors translate constraints that induces cognitive shift so as to identify opportunities and reshapes cultural characteristics of resources, further developing creative services. Practically, the analysis also expands the practice of bricolage, and points out that, once social actors could shift to a ＂second thought＂, by means of relativity cognition and resource conversion, they could develop a new understanding of constraints while turning resistance into assistance; and as social actors apprehend the cultural elasticity of resources, they could convert resources' nature and transform their value. As such, enterprises need not to restrict themselves pessimistically and may discover opportunities out of frustration, while transforming inferior resources into charming services.

1. 陳意文,吳思華,項維欣(2010)。資源基礎觀點下之資源拼湊與價值創造：以台灣翅帆開發創新產品為例。科技管理學刊，15(2)，1-20。
   連結：
2. 陳蕙芬(2015)。柔韌設計：化機構阻力為創新助力。中山管理評論，23(1)，13-55。
   連結：
3. 彭康麟,洪碧怡,林明珠(2011)。逆境生存、創新思維¾¾以節慶活動行銷幼教產業。產業管理評論，5(1)，35-47。
   連結：
4. 黃囇莉,鄭琬蓉,黃光國(2008)。邁向發聲之路：上下關係中忍的歷程與自我之轉化。本土心理學研究，29，3-76。
   連結：
5. 蕭瑞麟,歐素華,吳彥寬(2017)。逆勢拼湊：化資源制約為創新來源。中山管理評論，25(1)，219-268。
   連結：
6. 蕭瑞麟,歐素華,陳煥宏(2019)。負負得正：相依性如何促成負資源轉換。組織與管理，12(1)，127-171。
   連結：
7. 蕭瑞麟,歐素華,陳蕙芬(2014)。劣勢創新：梵谷策展中的隨創行為。中山管理評論，22(2)，323-367。
   連結：
8. 蕭瑞麟,歐素華,蘇筠(2017)。逆強論：隨創式的資源建構過程。台大管理論叢，27(4)，43-74。
   連結：
9. Acar, O. A.,Tarakci, M.,van Knippenberg, D.(2019).Creativity and innovation under constraints: A cross-disciplinary integrative review.Journal of Management,45(1),96-121.
10. Baker, T.(2007).Resources in play: Bricolage in the toy store(y).Journal of Business Venturing,22(5),694-711.
11. Baker, T.,Miner, A. S.,Eesley, D. T.(2003).Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process.Research Policy,32(2),255-276.
12. Baker, T.,Nelson, R. E.(2005).Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage.Administrative Science Quarterly,50(3),329-366.
13. Barney, J. B.,Wright, M.,Ketchen, D. J., Jr.(2001).The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991.Journal of Management,27(6),625-641.
14. Barr, P. S.,Stimpert, J. L.,Huff, A. S.(1992).Cognitive change, strategic action, organizational renewal.Strategic Management Journal,13(5)
15. Bechky, B. A.,Okhuysen, G. A.(2011).Expecting the unexpected? How SWAT officers and film crews handles surprises.Academy of Management Journal,54(2),239-261.
16. Blaikie, N.(1993).Approaches to social enquiry.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
17. Dalpiaz, E.,Rindova, V.,Ravasi, D.(2016).Combining logics to transform organizational agency: Blending industry and art at Alessi.Administrative Science Quarterly,61(3),347-392.
18. Dolmans, S. A. M.,van Burg, E.,Reymen, I.,Romme, G.(2014).Dynamics of resource slack and constraints: Resource positions in action.Organization Studies,35(4),511-549.
19. Foldy, E. G.,Goldman, L.,Ospina, S.(2008).Sensegiving and the role of cognitive shifts in the work of leadership.Leadership Quarterly,19(5),514-529.
20. Garud, R.,Karnøe, P.(2003).Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship.Research Policy,32(2),277-300.
21. Gioia, D.,Chittipeddi, K.(1991).Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation.Strategic Management Journal,12(6),433-448.
22. Gladwell, M.(2013).David and Goliath: Underdogs, misfits, and the art of battling giants.New York, NY:Little, Brown and Company.
23. Goldratt, E. M.(2004).Essays on the theory of constraints.Great Barrington, MA:North River Press.
24. Goodman, P. S.(Ed.),Sproull, L. S.(Ed.)(1990).Technology and organizations.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
25. Griffith, T.(1999).Technology features as triggers for sensemaking.Academy of Management Review,24(3),472-488.
26. Hamel, G.,Prahalad, C. K.(1993).Strategy as stretch and leverage.Harvard Business Review,71(2),75-84.
27. Hirsch, P. M.(1986).From ambushes to golden parachutes: Corporate takeovers as an instance of cultural framing and institutional integration.American Journal of Sociology,77,800-837.
28. Hockerts, K.(2015).How hybrid organizations turn antagonistic assets into complementarities.California Management Review,57(3),83-106.
29. Howard-Grenville, J.,Golden-Biddle, K.,Irwin, J.,Mao, J.(2011).Liminality as cultural process for cultural change.Organization Science,22(2),522-539.
30. Keupp, M. M.,Gassmann, O.(2013).Resource constraints as triggers of radical innovation: Longitudinal evidence from the manufacturing sector.Research Policy,42(8),1457-1468.
31. Lounsbury, M.,Glynn, M. A.(2001).Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources.Strategic Management Journal,22(6/7),545-564.
32. Maitlis, S.,Lawrence, T. B.(2007).Triggers and enablers of sensegiving in organizations.Academy of Management Journal,50(1),57-84.
33. Markus, M. L.(1994).Finding a happy medium: Explaining the negative effects of electronic communication on social life at work.ACM Transactions on Information Systems,12(2),119-149.
34. McGrath, R. G.(1995).Advantage from adversity: Learning from disappintment in internal corporate venture.Journal of Business Venturing,10(2),121-142.
35. Morgan, A.,Barden, M.(2015).A beautiful constraint: How to transform your limitations into advantages, and why it’s everyone’s business.London, UK:Wiley.
36. Newman, K. L.(2000).Organizational transformation during institutional upheaval.Academy of Management Review,25(3),602-619.
37. Nisbett, R. E.,Peng, K.,Choi, I.,Norenzayan, A.(2001).Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition.Psychological Review,108(2),291-310.
38. Orlikowski, W. J.,Gash, D. C.(1994).Technology frames: Making sense of information technology in organizations.ACM Transactions on Information Systems,12(2),174-207.
39. Pawar, B. S.,Eastman, K. K.(1997).The nature and implications of contextual influences on transformational leadership: A conceptual examination.Academy of Management Review,22(1),80-109.
40. Pettigrew, A.(1987).Context and action in the transformation of the firm.Journal of Management Studies,24(6),649-670.
41. Powell, E. E.,Baker, T.(2014).It’s what you make of it: Founder identity and enacting strategic responses to adversity.Academy of Management Journal,57(5),1406-1433.
42. Radjou, N.,Prabhu, J.(2015).Frugal innovation: How to do more with less.London, UK:The Economist Newspaper.
43. Rindova, V.,Dalpiaz, E.,Ravasi, D.(2011).A cultural quest: A study of organizational use of new cultural resources in strategy formation.Organization Science,22(2),413-431.
44. Rosso, B. D.(2014).Creativity and constraints: Exploring the role of constraints in the creative processes of research and development teams.Organization Studies,35(4),551-585.
45. Rouleau, L.(2005).Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: How middle managers interpret and sell change every day.Journal of Management Studies,42(7),1413-1441.
46. Salunke, S.,Weerawardena, J.,McColl-Kennedy, J. R.(2013).Competing through service innovation: The role of bricolage and entrepreneurship in project-oriented firms.Journal of Business Research,66(8),1085-1097.
47. Schön, D. A.,Rein, M.(1994).Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies.New York, NY:Basic Books.
48. Senyard, J.,Baker, T.,Steffens, P.,Davidsson, P.(2014).Bricolage as a path to innovativeness for resource-constrained new firms.Journal of Product Innovation Management,31(2),211-230.
49. Sonenshein, S.(2017).Stretch: Unlock the power of less and achieve more than you ever imagined.New York, NY:Harper Business.
50. Vaara, E.,Whittington, R.(2012).Strategy-as-practice: Taking social practices seriously.Academy of Management Annals,6(1),285-336.
51. Watzlawick, P.,Weakland, J.,Fisch, R.(1974).Change: Principles of problem formation and problem resolution.London, UK:Norton & Company.
52. Witell, L.,Gebauer, H.,Jaakkola, E.,Hammedi, W.,Patricio, L.,Perks, H.(2017).A bricolage perspective on service innovation.Journal of Business Research,79,290-298.
53. Wrzesniewski, A.,Dutton, J. E.(2001).Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work.Academy of Management Review,26(2),179-201.
54. Yin, R. K.(1989).Case study research: Design and methods.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
55. Zimmerman, M. A.,Zeitz, G. J.(2002).Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy.Academy of Management Review,27(3),414-431.
56. Zott, C.,Huy, Q. N.(2007).How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources.Administrative Science Quarterly,52(1),70-105.
57. 木下齊,張佩瑩（譯）(2017).地方創生：小城鎮、商店街、返鄉青年的創業十個鐵則.新北市:遠足文化.
58. 黃光國(2014)。論含攝文化的積極心理學。台灣心理諮商季刊，2(6)，36-47。
59. 福武總一郎,北川富朗,張玲玲（譯）(2017).從直島啟航的瀨戶內國際藝術祭¾¾以藝術活化地方.臺北市:遠流.

1. 蔡敦浩,游銘仁,李慶芳,吳靜吉(2023)。情急智生：探索口罩國家隊急興拼創的歷程。管理學報，40(3)，245-276。
2. 關欣,蕭瑞麟(2023)。相對感受：參考點對於顧客體驗的影響。組織與管理，16(2)，1-67。
3. 徐嘉黛(2022)。意會重塑：博物館服務設計中的導意作法。中山管理評論，30(5)，767-807。
4. (2024)。傳統工藝產業之思維轉換與資源拼湊──以廣興紙寮為例。產業與管理論壇，26(1)，56-87。