開放平盤以下放空與現股當沖對效率市場之影響：台灣股市之實證

The Impacts of Short Selling and Day Trading on Market Efficiency: Evidence from the Taiwan Stock Market

10.6735/JAFD.201409_7(2).0003

洪瑞成(Jui-Cheng Hung)；王偉權(Wei-Chuan Wang)；紀佳芳(Chia-Fang Chi)

弱式效率市場 ； 變異數比率檢定 ； 多重變異數比率檢定 ； Weak-form Efficient Market ； Variance Ratio Tests ； Multiple Variance Ratio Tests

會計與財金研究

7卷2期（2014 / 09 / 01）

43 - 69

繁體中文

自2008年金融海嘯與2009年的歐債危機後，全世界的金融市場陷入空前低迷，經濟狀況趨向悲觀，台灣股市也無法幸免於難。金管會為了刺激經濟，振興台灣股市，分別於2013年9月23日施行了平盤以下可放空股票以及2014年1月6日開放現股當沖的兩項新政策，期望能提升台灣股市的成交量，帶動整體經濟情勢向上攀升，促使經濟能逐漸好轉。本文使用了Lo and Mackinlay（1998）的參數型變異數比率檢定，接著以Wright（2000）以rank與sign為基礎之非參數變異數比率檢定，最後以Chow and Denning（1993）之多重變異數比率來檢定，並針對此兩項新制度施行的前後三個月對市場效率的影響。由實證結果得知，在此兩項新制度施行後，約有五成的股票顯示由拒絕弱效率市場假說轉為接受此假說，尤以電子類股更加明顯。由此可知，當開放帄盤以下可放空股票與現股當沖後，對於部份的股票市場效率性的確有所提升。

After the 2008 financial tsunami and 2009 European debt crisis, financial markets and economies around the world sank into depression and the Taiwan stock market is unable to get away from this situation as well. To stimulate the economy and invigorate the stock market, the financial authority in Taiwan revoked the short selling restriction on Sep 23, 2013 and implemented day trading on Jan 6, 2014, expecting these policies can promote the volume of stock market so as to push forward the economy. This study uses the parametric variance ratio test of Lo and Mackinlay (1998), the multiple variance ratio test of Chow and Denning (1993), and the rank- and size-based nonparametric variance ratio test of Wright (2000) to examine the impacts of these two policies on the market efficiency. The empirical results indicate that the weak-form efficient market hypothesis, originally rejected before the policies are implemented, is accepted for 50% stocks after the policies are implemented. This evidence is more significant for those in electrical sector. This implies that the market efficiency is gradually improved by these two policies.

1. 洪瑞成、劉洪鈞、顏偉倫(2008)。延長交易時間對台股指數效率性的影響。輔仁管理評論，15(2)，41-59。
   連結：
2. Blaire-Franch, J. & Contreras, D. (2004). Ranks and Signs-based Multiple Varicance Ration Tests. Working paper, University of Valencia
3. Alexander, G. J.,Peterson, M. A.(1999).Short Selling on the New York Stock Exchange and the Effect of the Uptick Rule.Journal of Financial Intermediation,8(1-2),90-116.
4. Belaire-Franch, J.,Opong, K. K.(2005).Some Evidence of Radom Walk Behavior of Euro Exchange Rates using Ranks and Signs.Journal of Banking & Finance,29(7),1631-1643.
5. Belaire-Franch, J.,Opong, K. K.(2005).A Variance Ratio Test of the Behaviour of Some FTSE Equity Indices Using Ranks and Signs.Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting,24,93-107.
6. Campbell, B.,Dufour, J. M.(1997).Exact Nonparametric Tests of Orthogonality and Random Walk in the Presence of a Drift Parameter.International Economic Review,38,151-173.
7. Chow, K. V.,Denning, K. C.(1993).A Simple Multiple Variance Ratio Test.Journal of Econometrics,58,385-401.
8. Demirguc-Kunt,Maksimovic, V.(1996).Stock Market Development and Financing Choices of Firms.World Bank Economic Review,10(2),341-69.
9. Fama, E.(1970).Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work.Journal of Finance,25,383-417.
10. Jarque, C. M.,Bera, A. K.(1987).A Test for Normality of Observations and Regression Residuals.International Statictical Review,55,163-172.
11. Kim, J. H.,Shamsuddin A.(2007).Are Asian Stock Markets Efficient? Evidence from New Multiple Variance Ratio Tests.Journal of Empirical Finance,15,518-532.
12. Lee, S. B.,Chung, J. S.(1996).Price Limits and Stock Market Efficiency.Journal of Business Finance and Accounting,23,585-601.
13. Lee, S. B.,Chung, J. S.(1998).The Effect of Market Transparency: Volatility and Liquidity in Korean Stock Market.Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting,11,23-35.
14. Liu, C. Y.,He, J.(1991).A Variance-ratio Test of Random Walks in Foreign Exchange Rates.Journal of Finance,46(2),773-785.
15. Lo, A. W.,Mackinlay, A. C.(1988).Stock Market Prices do not Follow Rando Walks: Evidence From a Simple Specification Test.Review of Financial Studies,1(1),41-66.
16. Lo, A. W.,Mackinlay, A. C.(1989).The Size and Power Variance Ratio Test in Finite Samples: A Monte Carlo Investigation.Journal of Econometrics,40,203-238.
17. Luger, R.(2003).Exact Non-parametric Tests for a Random Walk with Unknown Drift under Conditional Heteroskedasticity.Journal of Econometrics,115,259-276.
18. Wright, J. H.(2000).Alternative Variance-Ratio Tests Using Ranks and Signs.Journal of Business and Economic Statistics,18(1),1-9.
19. 胡星陽、梁敏芳(1995)。漲跌幅限制與台灣股票市場波動。證券市場發展季刊，7(1)，1-25。
20. 馬黛(1993)。台灣股市結構與制度。中華民國管理科學學會。
21. 張美燕(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國中原大學企業管理學系。
22. 許溪南、王耀斌、洪銓(2011)。台灣股票市場成分波動性之分類、趨勢與影響因素。中華管理評論國際學報，14(2)
23. 郭晃庭(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學管理學院碩士在職專班財務金融組。
24. 陳樹(2013)。台灣證券市場發展所面臨之挑戰。金融與經濟政策研究討會
25. 黃德芬(1995)。台灣股票市場波動性之研究。證券市場發展季刊，7(4)，157-184。
26. 詹司如、林靖中、郭玟秀(2008)。平盤以下可融券賣出對股票價格行為之影響。經濟與管理論叢，4(2)，203-228。
27. 劉宏亮(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台灣科技大學財務金融所。