公司治理與資本結構關係之研究－以營建業為例

The Relationship between Corporate Governance and Capital Structure - the Cases of Construction Industry

10.6735/JAFD.201509_8(2).0003

楊馥如(Fu-Ju Yang)；張曉楨(Hsiao-Chen Chang):林惠雪(Hui-Xue Lin)；蔣宓芝(Mi-Zhi Jiang)

公司治理 ； 資本結構 ； 營建業 ； Corporate Governance ； Capital Structure ； Construction Industry

會計與財金研究

8卷2期（2015 / 09 / 01）

33 - 60

繁體中文

本文以2003年到2013年的中國上市建築業和台灣上市營建業公司為樣本，研究公司治理與資本結構的關係，資本結構以槓桿比率作為因變數，公司治理的獨立變量則為董事會規模、公司規模、CEO雙元性、股權集中度及董事會會議次數及董監事持股比例等六項作為衡量標準。實證研究以敘述分析、Pearson相關分析表及複迴歸分析做為研究方法。研究結果顯示，台灣的上市營建業的董事會規模、公司規模、董事會會議次數及董監事持股比例與資本結構正相關，台灣的上市營建業的CEO雙元性及股權集中度與資本結構負相關，而中國上市建築業的所有變數與資本結構不顯著，此研究結果發現台灣上市營建業的公司治理與資本結構間的關係與文獻研究結果較一致。

This paper investigated the relationship between corporate governance and capital structure about construction industry which is publicly traded in China and in Taiwan during the period from 2003 to 2013. The leverage represented the capital structure as the dependent variable. Board size, size of the firm, CEO/Chair duality, ownership concentration, the number of board meeting and shareholding of directors represented as corporate governance as the independent variables. Empirical research covered descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation and multiple regression analysis. The results showed that leverage has positive effect on board size, size of firm, the number of board meeting and shareholding of directors, while it has negative effect on CEO/Chair duality and ownership concentration in Taiwan. The results showed that the relationship between corporate governance and capital structure in Taiwan re consistent with the previous literature, while corporate governance and capital structure are different in China.

1. 丁秀儀(2009)。公司治理是否受到機構投資人的青睞。管理學報，26(3)，233-253。
   連結：
2. 李馨蘋、莊宗憲(2007)。公司治理機制與公司績效之實證研究。東吳經濟商學學報，57，1-27。
   連結：
3. 中華徵信所企業股份有限公司，http://www.credit.com.tw/CreditOnline/cfcontent/industrial/weekly/index.cfm?sn=257
4. 中華人民共和國住房和城鄉建設部，http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/zcfg/jsbwj_0/jsbwjgczl/201407/t20140723_218568.html
5. 產業價值鏈資訊平台，http://ic.gretai.org.tw/introduce.php?ic=S000
6. 中華民國內政部營建署營造業法施行細則，http://www.6law.idv.tw/6law/law3/%E7%87%9F%E9%80%A0%E6%A5%AD%E6%B3%95%E6%96%BD%E8%A1%8C%E7%B4%B0%E5%89%87.htm
7. Alba, P.,Claessens, S.,Djankov, S.(1998).Thaniland's corporate financing and governance structures: impact on firms's competitiveness.Technology and Corporate Finance,3(1),20-21.
8. Bodaghi, A.,Ahmadpour, A.(2010).The Effect of Corporate Governance and Ownership Structure on Capital Structure of Iranian Listed Companies.International Conference on Enterprise Systems
9. Denis, D. K.,McConnell, J. J.(2002).International Corporate Governance.Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,38(1),1-36.
10. Gill, A.,Biger, N.,M., Harvinder S.,Shah, C.(2012).Corporate Governance and Capital Structure of Small Business Service Firms in India.International Journal of Economics and Finance,4(8),72-82.
11. Rehman, M. A. U.,Rehman, R. U.,Raoof. A.(2011).Does corporate governance lead to a change in the capital structure?.American Journal of Social and Management Sciences,1(2),191-195.
12. Saad, N. M.(2010).Corporate Governance Compliance and the Effects to Capital Structure in Malaysia.International Journal of Economics and Finance,2(1),105-114.
13. Sheikh, N. A.,Wang, Z.(2012).Effects of corporate governance on capital structure: empirical evidence from Pakistan.Corporate Governance,12(5),629-641.
14. Stewart C.,Myers, S. C.(1984).The Capital Structure Puzzle.The Journal of Finance,39(3),574-592.
15. 王美華(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。朝陽科技大學。
16. 陳厚安(2011)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。南台科技大學企業管理研究所。
17. 詹忠衛(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。成功大學財務金融研究所。
18. 劉仲晏(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。南台科技大學會計資訊系研究所。

1. 莊美玲(2017)。董監事特性、股權結構和公司營運績效的關係。長榮大學經營管理研究所學位論文。2017。1-54。