题名

再探玻利瓦的泛美主義-以與桑坦德的信件為討論的核心

并列篇名

Simón Bolívar's Pan-Americanism: A Study Based on His Letters to Francisco Santander in the 1820s

作者

倪仲俊(Ni, Chung-Chun)

关键词

西蒙.玻利瓦 ; 法蘭西斯哥.桑坦德 ; 泛美主義 ; 巴拿馬會議 ; 克瑞奧里國族主義 ; Simón Bolívar ; Francisco Santander ; Pan-Americanism ; Panama Congress ; Creole Nationalism

期刊名称

史學彙刊

卷期/出版年月

35期(2016 / 12 / 31)

页次

175 - 203

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文耙梳了玻利瓦(Simón Bolívar)在西元1820年代寫給桑坦德(FranciscoSantander)的信件後,對渠泛美主義之內涵與實踐困境進行再理解。在解殖後新國家的想像上,玻利瓦主張建立一個中央集權的大型單一國家,這是渠執著於泛美主義整合的原因;惟玻利瓦又反對北美式的聯邦主義,使得在美洲國族國家的建構過程中,既欠缺有效的元素去說服人民認同彼此,又無法用制度理性去節制地方主義。玻利瓦以務實主義彈性調整其泛美整合的路徑,不但先將國家整合的範圍縮減至由他所解放的區域,並且階段性地以西語美洲聯盟為整合標的、訴諸共同的外在危機來凝聚內部團結,這成為西元1826年巴拿馬會議召開之主要目的;然而,當時連玻利瓦自己都無法擺脫的本位主義,難以消解,助長了離心力量,正是美洲整合最大的障礙。

英文摘要

Through analyzing his letters to Francisco Santander in the 1820s, this paper attempts to further understand Simón Bolívar's Pan-Americanism, including its contents and difficulties. The factor that Bolívar imagined a new nation-state with huge populations, broad territories, and centralized powers led him to persist in Pan-Americanism. However, because Bolívar opposed to adopt the federal system of the Northern American Style, neither did it possess enough elements to convince its people to identify each other nor systematic rationality to restrict the vested sectionalism. Indeed, Bolívar, with pragmatism, modulated his way of the Pan-Americanist integration by reducing his dreamed nation into the regions liberated under his efforts and by changing the objective from a Pan-American nation-state into a confederation which was built on the common danger due to the European threats. Such a confederation was a reason to convene the Panama Congress of 1826. Nonetheless, the sectionalism, which also dominated Bolívar, was still the biggest obstacle for the Pan-American integration.

主题分类 人文學 > 歷史學
参考文献
  1. James Monroe,"The Monroe Doctrine", http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Monroe_Doctrine. 查閱日期:2016年6月30 日。
  2. Anderson, Benedict(1991).Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism.New York:Verso.
  3. Bethell, Leslie(ed.)(1985).The Cambridge History of Latin America.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  4. Bolívar, Simón,Bierck, Harold A., Jr.(Ed.),Bertrand, Lewis(trans.)(1951).Selected Writings of Bolivar.New York:The Colonial Press INC..
  5. Bolívar, Simón,Bierck, Harold A., Jr.(Ed.),Bertrand, Lewis(trans.)(1951).Selected Writings of Bolivar.New York:The Colonial Press INC..
  6. Bolívar, Simón,de Paula Santander, Francisco.Political Conflict in Gran Colombia: 1827 Proclamations of Santander and Bolivar.
  7. Charlip, Julie A.,Burns, E. Bradford(2010).Latin America: An Interpretive History.New York:Pearson Longman.
  8. Cummins, Light T.(1978).John Quincy Adams and Latin American Nationalism.Revista de Historia de América,86,221-231.
  9. Hamilton, Alexander,Jay, John,Madison, James(2016).The Federalist Papers.A Public Domain Book.
  10. Martin, Cheryl E.,Wasserman, Mark(2008).Latin America and Its People.New York:Pearson Longman.
  11. Riaño Cano, Germán(2001).El gran calumniado: Réplica a la leyenda negra de Santander.Seattle:Amazon Digital Services LLC.
  12. 倪仲俊(2010)。由玻利瓦的〈牙買加信函〉論其美洲認同的內涵。當代中國哲學學報,20,117-145。
  13. 倪仲俊、林子玄(2012)。孫中山的大亞洲主義與玻利瓦的泛美主義思維之比較研究。孫學研究,11月號,21-48。