登山健行步道防滑設計之人性化考量與評估

Humanized consideration and evaluation of anti-slip design for mountaineering and hiking trails

10.6848/JWL.202108_6(1).0005

吳水丕(Swei-Pi Wu)；楊健炘(Chien-Hsin Yang)

登山健行 ； 步道系統 ； 防滑設計 ； 滑倒 ； 人性化 ； Mountain hiking ； trail system ； anti-slip design ； slip ； humanization

工作與休閒學刊

6卷1期（2021 / 08 / 01）

47 - 64

繁體中文

在國內外登山健行中因跌倒或滑倒而造成傷亡的事故頻傳，究其原因，除了個人健康，安全知識，風險認知與防護措施等因素以外，登山步道系統的防滑設計，欠缺人性化的考量為最主要因素。本研究以巴福越嶺古道為例，徵募26位登山健行者進行實證研究，結果發現受試者在安全意識方面，安全知識不足、風險認知不夠以及安全措施不全。而在登山步道的防滑設施方面，受試者大多覺得滿意，除了在陡坡路段有加裝拉繩外，橋樑和圓木階梯大多有止滑的鐵絲網裝置。本研究亦發現有高達31%的受試者有滑倒、跌倒或踩空的經驗，主要原因為部份路面、木橋、或階梯止滑裝置破損且欠缺維護。此外，受試者普遍認為在防滑設施方面以拉繩或扶手最為重要，其次為路面的止滑裝置。最後，就階梯設計而言，這些受試者主觀知覺在階高與階深兩者皆不等的情境下最容易滑倒。整體而言，本研究建議登山健行者宜加強安全知識與風險認知，裝備與輔具必須齊全，另登山步道系統之防滑設計宜考慮在易滑的路面、橋樑與階梯處加裝扶手或拉繩，並輔以鐵絲網或防滑材料，以及指示標語等，以預防登山健行人員之滑倒與意外發生。

In domestic and foreign mountaineering and hiking, accidents caused by falls or slips are frequent. The reason is that in addition to personal health, safety knowledge, risk awareness and protective measures, the non-slip design of the hiking trail system lacks humaniged considerations is the most important factor. In this study, taking the Buff Transmountain Trail as an example, 26 mountain hikers were recruited to conduct an empirical study. The results found that the subjects had insufficient safety awareness, insufficient safety knowledge, insufficient risk awareness, and incomplete safety measures. As for the anti-slip facilities of hiking trails, most of the subjects were satisfied. Except for the installation of drawstrings on steep slopes, most of the bridges and log stairs had anti-slip wire mesh devices. This study also found that up to 31% of the subjects had slipped, fallen or stepped on the ground, mainly due to the damage and lack of maintenance of some roads, wooden bridges, or step anti-slip devices. In addition, the subjects generally believed that ropes or handrails were the most important in terms of anti-slip facilities, followed by anti-slip devices on the road surface. Finally, as far as the ladder design is concerned, these subjects' subjective perceptions are most likely to slip and fall in situations where the level of height and depth are not equal. Overall, this study suggests that mountain hikers should strengthen their safety knowledge and risk awareness, and the equipment and assistive devices must be complete. In addition, the anti-slip design of the hiking trail system should consider installing handrails or draw ropes on slippery roads, bridges and stairs, and supplemented by barbed wire or non-slip materials, as well as instruction slogans, etc. to prevent slips and accidents of mountain hikers.

1. 楊中潔(2011)。國立台北護理健康大學旅遊健康研究所。
   連結：
2. 衛生福利部國民健康署統計，2017。
3. Andes, C.,Jordi, F.C.(2009).The perception of causes of accidents in mountain sports: a study based on the experiences of victims.Accident Analysis and Prevention,41,197-201.
4. Bentley, T. A.,Cater, C.,Page, S. T.(2009).Adventure and ecotourism safety in Queensland: Operator experiences and practice.Tourism Management,30,1-9.
5. Hawkins, F.H.(1987).Human Factors in Fight.Aldershot, UK)):Ashgate.
6. Lim, K.,Taylor, L.(2005).Factors associated with physical activity among older people – a population-based study.Preventive Medicine,40(1),33-40.
7. Martin, B.,Cashel, C.,Wagstaff, M. C.,Breunig, M.(2006).Outdoor Leadership: Theory And Practice.Champaign:Human Kinetics.
8. Molloy, G, J,O’ Boyle, C. A.(2005).The SHEL model: a useful tool for analyzing and teaching the contribution of human factors to medical error.Academic Medicine,80(2),152-155.
9. 吳水丕,許勝雄,彭游(2017).人因工程.滄海圖書出版.
10. 汪荷清(2003).國家步道系統系統設計規範.行政院農業委員會出版.
11. 林澔貞,翁儷芯(2007)。全國步道系統建置與發展。台灣林業，二月號
12. 郭育任(2007)。台灣步道使用困難度分級之研究。全國登山研討會論文集
13. 黃士俊(2008).登山安全手冊.苗栗:雪霸國家公園管理處.
14. 楊秋霖(2003)。步道規劃設計重點及案件說明。國家步道系統建置發展研討會
15. 蔡守浦(2002)。潛談中老年人的休閒運動─登山。大專體育，58，118-123。
16. 賴惠玲（譯）,梅倬忠夫（編）,山本紀夫（編）(2007).山之世界.台北:台北商務.
17. 簡銘昰(2006)。台灣地區歷年山難事件原因探索分析。第十屆全國大專院校登山運動研討會