以校際巡迴講座課程實踐科際整合的通識教育

On the Implementation of Interdisciplinary General Education by Intermural Rotation Seminars Program

10.7041/SCJGE.200601.0025

王坪(Ping Wang)

通識教育 ； 科際整合 ； 巡迴講座 ； 群體教學 ； General education ； Interdisciplinarity ； Rotation Seminar ； team teaching

實踐通識論叢

5期（2006 / 01 / 01）

25 - 47

繁體中文

黃俊傑教授倡議以開設通識教育講座課程的方法深化大學通識教育。由近三年來中央大學所推動的地區性與全國性通識教育巡迴講座的成效來看，確實證明了這個建議的適切性與可行性。因為通識教育的深化在於通識課程與師資的優質化，優質的通識課程必須從科際整合的角度做有系統的規劃，而優質的師資則應是由各專業領域的教師組成教學團隊，在課程中有效地教導學生知識整合的方法—科際整合的通識教育，此正是當前世界關切的教育主要議題。目前所推動的通識教育巡迴講座課程，係透過各校一流師資的跨領域合作，來進行主題式的群體教學，則是實踐科際整合通識教育的最佳方式。然而，「講座課程的推動，並非一蹴可幾」，因此，本文藉由AIS 所提出的科際整合通識教育認證準則，檢視目前巡迴講座課程的實施方式，並提出檢討與改進意見，以作為未來落實科際整合通識教育的參考依據。

Prof. Huang, Chun-Chieh advocated that general education of university be deepened by implementing general education seminars. The relevance and viability of this approach has been practically verified based on the outcome achieved by the National Central University in the promotion of the local and nationwide intermural general education rotation seminars for the past three years. This is because deepening general education consists in quality general education courses, which are systematically coordinated from an interdisciplinary aspect, and in quality faculty, who combine good teamwork across various disciplines. Exposed to such quality conditions, students will be effectively equipped with knowledge integration methods-interdisciplinary general education, which is the main educational issue concerned by the world. The current intermural rotation seminars program, through the cooperation of quality faculty from different universities in a team-teaching mode, is the best way to implement interdisciplinary general education. Motivated by the difficulty to reach perfect success immediately, this paper is devoted to finding possible betterment and improvement by examining the practice of current program with the accreditation criteria proposed by the Association for Integrative Studies (AIS) for interdisciplinary general education program. Suggestions proposed will hopefully be used as a reference for future implementation of the program.

1. 教育部大學院校課程資源網
2. 教育部人文社會科學教育先導型計畫網站
3. Eric Digest
4. Accreditation Criteria for Interdisciplinary Studies in General Education
5. Davis, James R.(1995).Interdisciplinary Courses and Team Teaching.American Council on Education and the Oryx Press.
6. Gaff, Jerry G.(1989).Interdisciplinary studies in higher education.The Education Digest,55(2),57-60.
7. Garbowsky, Maryanne M.(1995).Interdisciplinary study: towards the millennium.Issues of Education at Community Colleges: Essays by Fellows in the Mid Career Fellowship Program at Princeton University.
8. Goodwin, William M.,LeBold, William K.(1975).Interdisciplinarity and Team Teaching.Engineering Education,66(3),247-254.
9. Gregory, Michael S.(1980).The science-humanities program (NEXA) at San Francisco State University: the 'two cultures' reconsidered.Leonardo,13,295-302.
10. Hepner, Freda(1996).Interdisciplinary classes.Issues of Education at Community Colleges: Essays by Fellows in the Mid Career Fellowship Program at Princeton University.
11. Hoffnung, Michele,Brown, Pearl(1992).An interdisciplinary women's studies course as a vehicle curriculum change.Transformations: New Jersey Project Journal,3(1),29-35.
12. Klein, Julie Thompson(1996).Interdisciplinary needs: the current context.Library Trends,45(2),134-154.
13. Klein, Julie Thompson(1999).Mapping Interdisciplinary Studies.Association of American Colleges and Universities.
14. Olorunnisola, Anthony A.,Ramasubramanian, Srividya,Russil, Chris,Dumas, Josephine(2003).Case study effectiveness in a team-teaching and general education environment.The Journal of General Education,52(3),176-199.
15. Peter Stearns(2002).General education revisited, again.Liberal Education,88,42.
16. Seabury, Marcia Bundy,Barret, Karren A.(2000).Creating and Maintaining Team-Taught Interdisciplinary General Education.New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education,87,15-24.
17. Silver(2002).The making of a missionary: Eric Ashby and technology.History of Education,31,557-570.
18. Vartan, Gregorian(2004).Colleges must reconstruct the unity of knowledge.Chronicle of Higher Education,50(39)
19. 江乾益(2004)。國立中興大學通識教育實施現況。博學，2，65-91。
20. 吳百祿(2004)。通識課程協同教學實施方式之研究－以南部五所大學校院爲例。正修通識教育學報，1，79-100。
21. 吳靖國(1999)。技職通識教育理論與實務。台北:師大書苑。
22. 李汾陽(2005)。教育部第二梯次提昇大學基礎教育計畫：開南區94年度「大學校院通識教育巡迴講座計畫書」。
23. 金耀基(1996)。大學之理念。時報文化出版公司。
24. 郭青青(2001)。通識教育：理論與落實－兼論詹姆斯宗教理論。台北:五南。
25. 游惠瑜(2005)。通識教育的協同合作教學設計－以『生命與社會關懷』課程爲例。大學校院通識教育巡迴講座教學研討會
26. 教育部第二梯次提昇大學基礎教育計畫：地區通識課程巡迴講座九十三年計畫成果報告書
27. 黃坤錦(1999)。美國大學的通識教育。台北:師大書苑。
28. 黃俊傑(2004)。全球化時代大學通識教育的新挑戰。高雄:中華民國通識教育學會。

1. 朱祖德(2007)。歷史人物課程的教與學—以三國人物爲例。實踐博雅學報，8，87-110。