题名

地理學的區域研究進展與議題、尺度分析

并列篇名

Progress of Regional Research and Analysis of Research Themes, Scale of Geography

DOI

10.29868/JSRD.201012.0003

作者

梁炳琨(Bang-Kuen Liang)

关键词

新區域地理學 ； 區域概念 ； 尺度 ； New Geography ； Regional Concept ； Scale

期刊名称

社會與區域發展學報

卷期/出版年月

3卷1期（2010 / 12 / 01）

页次

59 - 95

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

區域研究是地理學的重要傳統。1980年代以來經歷新區域地理學、區域科學、新區域主義的理論與實踐，地理學的區域研究更形重要。本文一方面回顧地理學區域研究的進展；另一方面分析近20年台灣與英美地理學區域研究的議題、空間尺度等。本研究發現：1、傳統區域由給定的空間單位和強調區域差異的研究重心，轉變至多元尺度或關係網絡空間，以及區域也受地理學其他領域的重視而生產許多新的概念。2、產業與區域的研究議題同受台灣與英美地理學的重視，而台灣有偏重旅遊與地史的議題趨勢。3、區域與衍生關鍵字同受台灣與英美的大量採用，但是台灣使用空間相關關鍵字仍然居首，英美則較偏重地方相關關鍵字的使用。4、相對於英美研究，社區是台灣較多的研究空間尺度，國家則是英美較多的研究空間尺度。而台灣的縣市與英美的市郡同受重視；同時跨國尺度都有增加的趨勢。
英文摘要

Regional research is one of the important traditions of geography. Since 1980s, through new regional geography, regional science and new regionalism, the regional research of geography has become more and more important. This study reviews regional research progress of geography and analyzes regional research themes and scale of geography of Taiwan and UK、USA in the past two decades. This study concludes that the research theme of traditional region has transformed from given space unit and emphasizing area difference to scalar or relational space. Regional concepts are valued by sub-discipline of geography, and therefore many new concepts are produced. Secondly, industries and region research themes of geography are both paid much attention to in Taiwan and UK、USA, while Taiwan tends to emphasize tourism and geohistory. Thirdly, regional keywords and derivative keywords are both widely used in Taiwan and UK、USA; space keywords are most used in Taiwan, while the UK、USA use more place keywords. Lastly, scale of city/county and transnational scale are much more researched in Taiwan and UK、USA, but there is more community scale study in Taiwan, and, on the other hand, UK and USA focus on country scale.
主题分类 人文學 > 地理及區域研究
参考文献
  1. 王文誠(2010)。邁向全球城市暨區域治理？台灣新五都的地理發展考察。國土與環境：新都與舊縣的地理思維研討會論文集，台北:
    連結：
  2. 周素卿(2002)。台灣人文地理學的研究進程：知識生產特性與學科進步性之探討。都市與計畫，29(2)，265-289。
    連結：
  3. Dickinson, R.E. (1947).City Region and Regionalism: a Geographical Contribution toHhuman Ecology. London: Kegan Paul, Trench.
  4. Agnew, J.(1999).Regions on the mind does not equal regions of the mind.Progress in Human Geography,23(1),91-96.
  5. Agnew, J.(2000).From the political economy of regions to regional political economy.Progress in Human Geography,24(1),101-110.
  6. Agnew, J.(1987).Place and Politics.Boston:Allen & Unwin.
  7. Cooke, P.(1992).Regional Innovation Systems: Competitive Regulation in the New Europe.Geoforum,23,365-382.
  8. Cresswell, T.、王志弘譯(2006)。地方：記憶、想像與認同。台北市:群學。
  9. Entrikin, J. N.(1996).Place and region 2.Progress in Human Geography,20(2),263-268.
  10. Etherington, D.,Jones, M.(2009).City-regions: new geographies of uneven development and inequality.Regional Studies,43(2),247-265.
  11. Gilbert, A.(1988).The new regional geography in English and French-speaking countries.Progress in Human Geography,12(2),208-228.
  12. Hart, J.F.(1982).The highest form of the geographer's art.Annals of the Association of American Geographers,72(1),1-29.
  13. Hartshorne, R.(1961).The Nature of Geography.Lancaster, Pa.:Association of American Geographers.
  14. Hartshorne, R.(1959).Perspective on the Nature of Geography.Chicago:Rand McNally& Company.
  15. Healey, P.(2009).City regions and place development.Regional Studies,43(6),831-843.
  16. Hettner, A.、王蘭生譯(1983)。地理學：它的歷史、性質和方法。北京:商務印書館。
  17. Holloway, L.(ed.),Rice, P.(ed.),Valentine, G.(ed.)(2003).Key Concepts in Geography.London:Sage.
  18. Johnston, R.J.(1991).Geography and Geographer.London:Edward Arnold.
  19. Johnston, R.J.,Gregory, D.,Pratt, G.,Watts, M.(2009).The Dictionary of Human Geography.Oxford:Blackwell.
  20. Johnston, R.J.,Gregory, D.,Pratt, G.,Watts, M.(1994).The Dictionary of Human Geography.Oxford:Blackwell.
  21. Johnston, R.J.,Gregory, D.,Pratt, G.,Watts, M.(2000).The Dictionary of Human Geography.Oxford:Blackwell.
  22. Johnston, R.J.,Gregory, D.,Pratt, G.,Watts, M.(1986).The Dictionary of Human Geography.Oxford:Blackwell.
  23. Johnston, R.J.,Gregory, D.,Pratt, G.,Watts, M.(1981).The Dictionary of Human Geography.Oxford:Blackwell.
  24. Jones, M.,MacLeod, G.(2004).Regional spaces, spaces of regionalism: territory, insurgent politics and the English question.Transaction of the Institute British Geographers,29,433-452.
  25. Kim, S.S.(2004).Regionalization and regionalism in East Asia.Journal of East Studies,4(1),39-67.
  26. Lefebvre, H.,Nicholson-Smith, D.(trans.)(1991).The Production of Space.Oxford:Basil Blackwell.
  27. MacLeod, G.,Jones, M.(2001).Renewing the geography of regions.Environment and Planning D: Social and Space,7,253-276.
  28. MacLeod, G.,Jones, M.(2007).Territorial, scalar, networked, connected: in what sense a regional world?.Regional Studies,41(9),1177-1191.
  29. Massey, D.(1994).Space, Place and Gender.Cambridge:Polity.
  30. Massey, D.(1993).Power-geometry and a progressive sense of place.Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change,London:
  31. Massey, D.,Allen, J.,Sarre, P.(1999).Human Geography Today.Cambridge:Polity.
  32. Morgan, K.(1997).The learning region: institutions, innovation and regional renewal.Regional Studies,31(5),491-503.
  33. Paasi, A.(2002).Place and region: regional worlds and words.Progress in Human Geography,26(6),802-811.
  34. Paasi, A.(2003).Region and place: regional identity in question.Progress in Human Geography,27(4),475-485.
  35. Parr, J.B.(2005).Perspectives on the city-region.Regional Studies,39,555-566.
  36. Passi, A.(1996).Territories, Boundaries and Consciousness.Chichester:Wiley.
  37. Peck, J.(2002).Political economies of scale: fast policy, interscalar relations and neoliberal workfare.Economic Geography,78,331-360.
  38. Perry, B.,May, T.(2007).Governance, science policy and regions: an introduction.Regional Studies,41(8),1039-1050.
  39. Pike, A.(2007).Whither regional studies?.Regional Studies,41(9),1143-1148.
  40. Pike, A.(1984).Place as a historically contingent process: structuration and time-geography.Annals of the Association of American Geographers,74,279-297.
  41. Pudup, M. B.(1988).Arguments within regional geography.Progress in Human Geography,12(3),369-390.
  42. Sagan, I.(2004).Looking for the nature of the contemporary region.Progress in Human Geography,28(2),141-144.
  43. Sauer, C.D.(1963).The eduction of a geographer, Land and Life.Berkeley:University of California Press.
  44. Scott, A.J.(2001).Globalization and the rise of city-regions.European Planning Studies,9(7),813-826.
  45. Scott, A.J.,Storper, M.(2003).Regions, globalization, development.Regional Studies,37,579-593.
  46. Soja, E.(1985).Regions in context: spatiality, periodicity, and the historical geography of the regional question.Enviroment and Planing : Society and Space,3,175-190.
  47. Stone, C.(1989).Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1964-1988.Lawrence:University Press of Kansas.
  48. 王文誠(2009)。關係經濟地理台灣科學園區的發展、轉變與調適。台北:國立台灣師範大學地理系。
  49. 王文誠(2006)。全球化趨勢下的都會區域治理：高雄的挑戰。環境與世界，13，36-56。
  50. 王秋原、趙建雄、何致中(1997)。區域地理研究的探討。地理學報，22，83-102。
  51. 施添福(1990)。地理學中的空間觀點。地理研究，16，115-137。
  52. 施添福(1984)。地理學研究在台灣地區的發展與變遷。地理研究，10，17-48。
  53. 洪富峰(2010)。高雄縣市合併的空間想像與城市競爭力。國土與環境：新都與舊縣的地理思維研討會論文集，台北:
  54. 陳國川(1995)。地理教材設計的理論與實踐。台北:師大書苑。
  55. 陳國川、葉韻翠(2010)。台灣行政區劃的演變及其意義。國土與環境：新都與舊縣的地理思維研討會論文集，台北:
  56. 馮正民(2007)。,台北:國科會社會科學研究中心。
  57. 潘朝陽(1999)。從赫特納到沙學浚的地理學本質論。地理研究，30，125-158。
  58. 潘朝陽(1989)。觀念論地理學─一個人文主義地理學方法論。地理研究，15，181-198。
  59. 潘朝陽(1987)。地理學方法論中的非實證論傳統。地理研究，13，167-192。
print cancel