题名

大型企業對冒險教育訓練方案之認同度與將來實行度之調查

并列篇名

An investigation of large enterprises’ acceptance and future employment of adventure training programs

DOI

10.6783/JAAEE.201612_(10).0007

作者

王伯宇

关键词

體驗教育 ; 戶外訓練 ; 人力資源發展 ; experiential education ; adventure training ; human resource development

期刊名称

體驗教育學報

卷期/出版年月

10期(2016 / 12 / 31)

页次

122 - 135

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究之目的在於針對臺灣前三百大之企業作冒險教育訓練之認同度與將來實行度的調查。以問卷調查法的方式來蒐集資料,並以SPSS 統計軟體進行分析。研究結果發現:1. 大型企業對於冒險教育訓練之團隊效能與個人效能都顯示出高度的認同,但對該教育訓練轉回實際工作之有效性則顯示出較低的認同度。2. 有超過六成的大型企業將來願意採行冒險教育訓練,但對於該教育訓練之安全、轉回實際工作時的有效性能是其擔憂的部分。本研究建議將來需對此種教育訓練於大型企業作更深與更廣的研究,並與其在小型企業之成效作一比較分析,使此種教育訓練於臺灣企業之有效性更為明確。

英文摘要

The purpose of this study was to investigate top 300 Taiwanese enterprises’ acceptance and future employment of adventure training programs. This study employed questionnaires to collect data and SPSS software to analyze the data. The findings of this study are: 1. The enterprises showed high acceptance toward team efficiency and personal efficiency brought by adventure training programs, but low acceptance toward that efficiency brought by adventure training programs could be easily transferred back to the working situation. 2. Over 60% of the enterprises would like to employ adventure training programs for the future human resource training. However, they worried the safety and effectiveness associated with adventure training programs. This study suggests that there is a need of deeper and broader studies for the efficiency of adventure training programs upon large enterprises. Furthermore, the comparison of the efficiency of adventure training programs between large and small businesses is needed, in order to provide better understanding of the application of adventure training programs in Taiwan.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 王伯宇(2015)。冒險教育課程對小型企業員工教育訓練之長期成效研究。臺灣運動教育學報,10,31-50。
    連結:
  2. 王伯宇、郭天祥(2004)。冒險活動於企業教育訓練之運用。中華體育季刊,18,34-42。
    連結:
  3. 吳崇旗、謝智謀(2006)。探討戶外冒險教育的效益。中華體育季刊,20,43-53。
    連結:
  4. Neill, J. (2008). A Program Evaluation Tool for Measuring the Impacts of Corporate Adventure Training. Retried from Outdoor Education Research & Evaluation Center.http://www.wilderdom.com/tools/leq/CorporateLEQScalesPaper.htm#Short&CustomizedVersions
  5. Bank, J.(1985).Outdoor development for managers.Brookfield, VT:Gower.
  6. Becker, R.(1998).Taking the misery out of experiential training.Training,35(2),78-88.
  7. Broderick, A.,Pearce, G.(2001).Indoor adventure training: A dramaturgical approach to management development.Journal of Organizational Change Management,14(3),239-252.
  8. Ewert, A. W.(1989).Outdoor adventure pursuits: Foundations, models, and theories.Columbus, OH:Horizons.
  9. Gustav, G.,Meyer, C. D. P.,Strydom, H.,Ellis, S.(2013).A comparison between centre-based and expedition-based (wilderness) adventure experiential learning regarding group effectiveness: a mixed methodology.South African Journal for Research in Sport, Physical Education and Recreation,35(1),11-24.
  10. McEvoy, G. M.,Cragun, J. R.(1997).Using outdoor training to develop and accomplish organizational vision.HR. Human Resource Planning,20(3),20-28.
  11. Miles, J. C.(Ed.),Priest, S.(Ed.)(1999).Adventure programming.State College, PA:Venture.
  12. Priest, S.(1998).Physical challenge and the development of trust through corporate adventure training.Journal of Experiential Education,21(1),31-34.
  13. Rhodes, H. M.,Martin, A. J.(2014).Behavior Change After Adventure Education Courses: Do Work Colleagues Notice?.Journal of Experiential Education,37(3),265-284.
  14. Tracy, W. R.(1998).The human resources glossary.Boca Raton, FL:St. Lucie press.
  15. 天下雜誌(2000)。天下2000大跨業總排名。天下雜誌,28,162-353。
  16. 吳柏林(2000)。現代統計學。臺北市:五南。
  17. 李城忠(2011)。應用統計學:量化研究SPSS範例分析。臺北市:新文京。
  18. 金玉梅、吳怡靜、蔡蕙如(2001)。21世紀輕鬆致勝-出走。天下雜誌,29,30-54。
  19. 徐正芳(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣,國立中央大學。
  20. 黃良志、黃家齊、溫金豐、廖文志、韓志翔(2011)。人力資源管理:基礎與應用。臺北市:華泰文化。
  21. 黃貞諭(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣,國立體育大學。
  22. 簡建忠(2014)。人力資源管理:以合作觀點創造價值。新北市:前程文化。