大學生物聯網學習成效－以師生互動為中介變項

Learning Outcomes of College Students' Internet of Things-Taking the Teacher-student Interaction as the mediator

徐明珠(Ming-Ju HSU)；賀秋白(Chiu-Pai HO)

物聯網 ； 師生互動 ； 教學方法 ； 學習成效 ； 中介變項 ； 結構方程模式 ； Internet of Things ； teacher-student interaction ； teaching methods ； learning outcomes ； mediator variable ； Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)

中華印刷科技年報

2018（2018 / 04 / 01）

105 - 118

繁體中文

研究目的：工業4.0如火如荼開展，物聯網教育成為必然的趨勢。為了瞭解大學生學習物聯網課程的情形，本研究針對接受過物聯網教育的大學生進行問卷調查，以「教學方法」為自變項、「學習成效」為依變項，並以「師生互動」為中介變項，探討大學生對教學方法的正向態度是否會經由師生互動此中介變項對學習成效產生影響。研究方法：本研究針對修習物聯網的大學生進行問卷調查，獲得問卷230份，所得資料以結構方程模式（Structural Equation Modeling, SEM）進行驗證性因素分析、結構模型分析。本研究結果發現四項結論：1.大學物聯網課程的「教學方法」對於「學習成效」具有顯著性影響；2.大學物聯網課程的「師生互動」對於「學習成效」具有顯著性影響；3.大學物聯網課程的「教學方法」對於「師生互動」具有顯著性影響；4.大學物聯網課程的「教學方法」間接藉由「師生互動」的中介作用對「學習成效」具有顯著性影響。研究創意／價值：本研究結果可以提供大學在開設物聯網課程時的參考，改進教學方法，鼓勵師生互動，並採用強化師生互動的教學方法，以提升學習成效。

Purpose of Study: Industry 4.0 in full swing, the Internet of Things Education has become an inevitable trend. In order to understand the situation of college students' studying the Internet of Things course, this research conducted a questionnaire survey for college students who have received education in IoT. Teaching methods as an independent variable, Learning outcomes as a dependent variable, and teacher-student interaction as a mediator variable, to explore the positive attitude of college students to teaching methods whether this intervening change will have an impact on the learning outcomes through teacher-student interaction. Methodology: In this study, IOT students were surveyed and 230 questionnaires were obtained. Confirmatory factor analysis and structural model analysis were conducted by Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Findings: 1. College teachers' teaching methods for IoT courses have a significant impact on learning outcomes; 2. College teachers' teacher-student interaction for IoT courses in the college have a significant impact on learning outcomes; 3. College teachers' teaching methods for IoT courses have a significant impact on teacher-student interaction; 4. Teacher-student interaction for IoT courses in the college plays a partial mediating role between teaching methods and student learning outcomes. Originality/value: The results of this study can be provided the reference for colleges in planning IoT courses, improving teaching methods, encouraging interaction between teachers and students, and adopting teaching methods that enhance teacher-student interaction so as to improve learning outcomes.

1. 沈緯鈞、廖主民(2011)。運動心理因子之中介模式分析策略─重新審視迴歸分析取向。中華體育季刊，25(1)，94。
   連結：
2. 黃政傑、張嘉育(2010)。讓學生成功學習：適性課程與教學之理念與策略。課程與教學季刊，13(3)，1-2。
   連結：
3. Ackers, J.,Hardman, F.(2001).Classroom interaction in Kenyan primary school.Compare,31(2),245-261.
4. Adam, S.(2004).Using Learning Outcomes: A consideration of the nature, role, application and implications for European education of employing 'learning outcomes' at the local, national and international levels.United Kingdom Bologna Seminar,Edinburgh. Scotland:
5. Anderson, L.W. (Ed.),Krathwohl, D.R.(Ed.),Airasian, P.W.,Cruikshank, K.A.,Mayer, R.E.,Pintrich, P.R.,Raths, J.,Wittrock, M.C.(2001).A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives.New York:Longman.
6. Baron, R.M.,Kenny, D.K.(1986).The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51(6),1173-1182.
7. Bloom, B.S. (Ed.),Engelhart, M.D.,Furst, E.J.,Hill, W.H.,Krathwohl, D.R.(1956).Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals.New York:David McKay.
8. Dalton, R. H.(1961).Personality and social interaction.Boston, MA:D. C. Heath and Company.
9. Dunn, R.,Dunn, K.(1992).Teaching elementary students through their individual learning styles.Boston:Allyn & Bacon.
10. European Union=EU(2004).ECTS Users' Guide - European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System for Lifelong Learning.European Commission.
11. Ewell(2001).Accreditation and student learning outcomes: A proposed point of department. CHEA occasional paper.Washington D. C.:Council for Higher Education Accreditation.
12. Flanders, N. A.(1970).Analyzing teaching behavior.New York:Addison-Wesley.
13. Gage, N. L.(1978).The scientific basis of the art of teaching.New York, NY:Teachers College, Columbia University.
14. Johnson, L.,Adams Becker, S.,Estrada, V.,Freeman, A.(2015).NMC Horizon Report: 2015 Higher Education Edition.Austin, Texas:The New Media Consortium.
15. Jones, Nick (2016). Top 10 IoT Technologies for 2017 and 2018. Gartner published: 22 January 2016.
16. Kennedy, D.(2007).Writing and Using Learning Outcomes-A Practical Guide.University of Chicago.
17. MacKinnon, D. P.,Dwyer, J. H.(1993).Estimating mediating effects in prevention studies.Evaluation Review,17,144-158.
18. Moore, M. G.(1989).Three types of interaction.The American Journal of Distance Education,3(2),1-6.
19. QCA,LSC(2004).QCA /LSC (2004). Qualifications and Curriculum Authority and Learning + Skills Council 2004, Principles for a credit framework for England: Terms and definitions, p. 12, March (London: QCA /LSC). Uses definitions from the Credit Common Accord for Wales. Published in July 2003..
20. Stone, C. A.,Sobel, M. E.(1990).The robustness of estimates of total indirect effects in covariance structure models estimated by maximum likelihood.Psychometrika,55(2),337-352.
21. 丁振豐(2000)。社會互動分析法。教育大辭書。國家教育研究院。取自https://pedia.cloud.edu.tw/Entry/Detail/?title=%E7%A4%BE%E6%9C%83%E4%BA%92%E5%8B%95%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90%E6%B3%95
22. 王如哲(2010)。解析學生學習成效。評鑑雙月刊，27
23. 王素芸、陳柏霖(2017)。大學教學優良教師之特質與評選指標的建議。玄奘大學教學實務研究論叢，1
24. 史美瑤(2012)。21 世紀的教學：以「學生學習為中心」的教師發展。評鑑雙月刊，36
25. 東華大學(2018)。如何從學生的回饋中學習。教學資源網。取自http://teaching.ndhu.edu.tw/files/15-1095-26247,c8448-1.php
26. 高翠霞、蔡崇建(1999)。學習風格與教學設計。教育資料與研究，29，46-49。
27. 張聖麟(2001)。改善教學品質的方法，提高學生學習動機。生活科技教育，34(1)，10-13。
28. 張霄亭、朱則剛、張鐸嚴、洪敏琬、胡怡謙、方郁琳、胡佩瑛(2002)。教學原理。臺北:空中大學。
29. 教育部(2016a)。大學院校課程資源網。取自http://course-tvc.yuntech.edu.tw/WebU/index.aspx
30. 教育部(2016b)。技專院校課程資源網。取自http://course-tvc.yuntech.edu.tw/Web/index.aspx
31. 陳玉婷(2010)。教學策略影響學習成效之實證研究。台南科大學報，29，208。
32. 陳寬裕、王正華(2013)。結構方程模型分析實務：AMOS 的運用。台北市:五南出版社。
33. 賀桂芬、辜樹仁(2016)。工業4.0 ─ 58 秒的競爭。取自http://topic.cw.com.tw/2016industry4.0/article.html
34. 辜輝趂(2017)。翻轉教室教學模式情境下學生的學習成果暨學習成果與滿意因素互動之研究。龍華科技大學學報，38
35. 黃淑玲、池俊吉(2010)。如何評估學生學習成效─以加州州立大學長灘分校系所訪視與測量中心之經驗為例。評鑑雙月刊，28
36. 楊思賢(2016)。高階思維教學的革新形貌探析。課程研究，11(1)，105-136。
37. 楊瑩(2011)。以學生學習成效為評量重點的歐盟高等教育品質保證政策。評鑑雙月刊，30
38. 劉維琪(2009)。迎接以SLO 為中心的評鑑新時代。評鑑雙月刊，20
39. 蕭文龍(2009)。多變量分析最佳入門實用書。碁峰。
40. 賴姝雅(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學。
41. 謝磊、葉保留 陸桑璐 陳道蓄(2012)。物聯網理論與關鍵技術研究進展與趨勢。開放系統專委會。取自https://cs.nju.edu.cn/lxie/publication/2012baogaob.pdf
42. 蘇錦麗(2009)。美國WASC 採行的「學生學習成果本位評估模式」。評鑑雙月刊，22

1. 林如瀚(2023)。運動心理學教學新思維：學生編撰案例的學習效益。臺灣運動心理學報，23(3)，1-18。
2. (2023)。探討觀光休閒領域學生線上學習疲乏對學習參與度之影響。休閒與遊憩研究，13(1)，46-68。