题名

文創產品情感設計與消費者購買意願之研究

并列篇名

The Study of Cultural and Creative Products' Emotional Design and Customer Purchase Intention

作者

蘇文仲(Wen-Zhong Su);林伯賢(Po-Hsien Lin);韓豐年(Feng-Nien Han)

关键词

文化創意產品 ; 情感設計 ; 購買意願 ; cultural and creative products ; emotional design ; purchase Intention

期刊名称

中華印刷科技年報

卷期/出版年月

2018(2018 / 04 / 01)

页次

213 - 224

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

近幾年台灣文化創意產業的發展相當熱絡,相關商品如雨後春筍般在市場上銷售,但在競爭的市場上,什麼樣的文創商品可以獲得消費者青睞,才能創造商品在市場的差異化,避免紅海的競爭而失去商品力。本研究採用Norman(2004)所提出的情感設計三元素之本能設計、行為設計與反思設計,探討文創產品設計與消費者購買意願之關聯性。研究的流程包含二個階段,首先在故宮精品館、台灣文創禮品館、Pinkoi等三大網站,邀請專家篩選暢銷排行榜之文創商品;第二階段提供篩選後的文創商品,受測者對於產品設計的喜好進行個人直覺性的問卷核選。經過統計分析得到的結論是,文創產品情感設計三元素之反思設計,最能影響消費者購買意願。

英文摘要

Recently, the development of cultural and creative industry is rife in Taiwan and relevant commodities enjoy brisk sales on the market. However, on the competitive market, what kind of cultural and creative commodities will attract the eyeballs of consumers? How can we create market differentiation for commodities in order to avoid cut-throat competition and lose competition of commodities. This study adopts the three emotional design elements proposed by Norman (2004): Visceral, Behavioral and Reflective design. The purpose of this study is to explore purchase Intention of consumer in selecting cultural and creative products. The flow of study is divided into two stages, first post on websites of Palace Museum Boutique Pavilion, Taiwan Cultural and Creative Souvenirs Pavilion and Pinkoi, and invite experts to screen cultural and creative products on bestseller list; the second stage provides cultural and creative commodities after screening and selection of questionnaire for individual intuitiveness of tester's preference for product design. The conclusion of this study shows reflective design of cultural and creative products significant correlation in preference of consumers.

主题分类 工程學 > 工程學總論
社會科學 > 傳播學
参考文献
  1. 徐啟賢、林榮泰(2011)。文創產品設計程序。設計學報,16(4)
    連結:
  2. 許麗玲、徐村和、唐嘉偉、梁智勇(2010)。Blog體驗價值對使用者持續使用意向之研究。資訊管理學報,4,89。
    連結:
  3. Ackerman, D.(1993).A Natural History of the Senses.Random House.
  4. Chin, W. W.(1998).Commentary: Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling.Management Information Systems Quarterly,22(1),7-16.
  5. Davis, F.D.(1989).Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.MIS Quarterly,13(3),319-340.
  6. Desmet, P. M. A.,Hekkert, P.(2009).Special issue editorial: Design & emotion.International Journal of Design,3(2),1-6.
  7. Engel, J. F.,Blackwell, R. D.,Miniard, P. W.(1984).Consumer Behavior.New York:Dryden Press.
  8. Fornell, C. R.,Lacker, D. F.(1981).Two structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research,18(1),39-50.
  9. Hair, J.F.,Black, W.C.,Babin, B.J.,Anderson, R.E.(2010).Multivariate Data Analysis.Upper Saddle River, New Jersey:Prentice Hall.
  10. Heufler, G.(2004).Design basics: from ideas to products.United States:Ram Pubns & Dist..
  11. Hooper, D.,Coughlan, J.,Mullen, M.(2008).Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit.Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods,6(1),53-60.
  12. Hoyer, W. D.,Maclnnis, D. J.(2007).Consumer Behavior.United States of America:George T. Hoffman.
  13. Keller, K. L.(2008).Strategic brand management: Building, measuring and managing brand equity.NJ:Prentice Hall.
  14. Kimery, K. M.,McCord, M.(2002).Third-party assurances: Mapping the road to trust in e-retailing.Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application,4(2),63-82.
  15. Kline, R. B.(2011).Principles and Practice of structural equation modeling.New York:Guilford.
  16. Kumar, A.,Lee, H. J.,Kim, Y. K.(2009).Indian consumers' purchase intention toward a United States versus local brand.Fall Conference of the American-Collegiate-Retailling-Association,Charleston, SC.:
  17. Leong, D.,Clark, H.(2003).Culture-based knowledge towards new design thinking and practice- A dialogue.Design Issues,19(3),48-58.
  18. Lewaski, Z.(1988).Product Esthetics -an interpretation for designers.Carson city, Nevada:Design & Development Engineering Press.
  19. Lin, L. Y.,Chen, C. S.(2006).The influence of the country-of-origin image, product knowledge and product involvement on consumer purchase decisions: an empirical study of insurance and catering services in Taiwan.Journal of Consumer Marketing,23(5),248-265.
  20. Norman, Donald A.(2004).Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things.New York:Basic Books.
  21. Nunnally, J. C.,Bernstein, I. H.(1994).Psychometric theory.New York:McGraw-Hill.
  22. Park, C. W.,Jaworski, B. J.,Maclnnis, D. J.(1986).Strategic brand concept-image management.The Journal of Marketing,135-145.
  23. Rahman, Osmud(2012).The Influence of Visual and Tactile Inputs on Denim Jeans Evaluation.International Journal of Design,6(1),11-25.
  24. Roozenburg, NFM、Eekels, J.、張建成譯(1995)。產品設計─設計基礎和方法論。臺北:六合出版社。
  25. Schiffman, L.G.,Kanuk, L.L.(2000).Comsumer Behavior.Prentice-Hall.
  26. Throsby, D.(2001).Economics and culture.Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
  27. 毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台(2003)。創造力研究。台北市:心理出版社。
  28. 呂清夫(1984)。造形原理。臺北:雄獅圖書。
  29. 周君瑞(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台南,成功大學。
  30. 林建煌(2010)。消費者行為。台北:華泰文化。
  31. 林崇宏(1995)。公式化造形法則理論應用於產品造形設計之探討。工業設計,24(4)
  32. 林崇宏(1998)。造形設計原理。臺北:視傳文化。
  33. 林榮泰(2005)。文化創意,設計加值。藝術欣賞,1(7),26-32。
  34. 林榮泰(2009)。文化創意產品設計—從感性科技、人性設計與文化創意談起。人文與社會科學簡訊,11(1),32-42。
  35. 洪淑惠(1999)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立交通大學應用藝術研究所。
  36. 張玲玉、王維慧、羅懷林、胡光忠(2007)。現代產品的功能設計。包裝工程,28(7),136-139。
  37. 莊煥銘、王淑娟(2003)。資訊系統採用行為意向之研究─以某大學為例。商管科技季刊,4(3),239-259。
  38. 陳秀羽(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。銘傳大學設計管理研究所。
  39. 廖世璋(2011)。文化創意產業。新北市:巨流。
  40. 顏惠芸、林伯賢、林榮泰(2014)。文創產品之感質特性探討。感性學報,2(1),34-61。
被引用次数
  1. (2020)。師範院校文化創意產品的購買意願、設計與行銷:以中國沿海地區某師範院校為例。區域與社會發展研究,11,1-29。
  2. (2023)。從文化角度探討農民曆傳統價值的認知。設計學研究,26(2),55-82。
  3. (2024)。跨界聯名發揮1+1>2力量—以國立臺灣美術館與台中大毅老爺行旅雙品牌聯名禮盒為例。商業設計學報,27,120-137。