個人創新與中小學教師使用行動學習教學之態度

Personal Innovativeness and Teachers' Attitude Towards Using M-Learning

徐明珠(Ming-Ju HSU)；賀秋白(Chiu-Pai HO)

行動學習 ； 個人創新 ； 科技接受模式 ； Mobile Learning (M-learning) ； Personal Innovativeness of Information Technology (PIIT) ； Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)

中華印刷科技年報

2019（2019 / 06 / 01）

235 - 246

繁體中文

當遠距學習、數位學習邁入行動學習，教師使用行動科技融入教學的態度值得關切。本研究以高中職、國中和國小教師為研究對象，採用便利抽樣的方式進行問卷調查研究，總計回收206份有效問卷；在統計方法上則採用結構方程模式進行檢定與分析。經由實證分析後，五項研究假設均成立：1.教師對行動學習教學之個人創新對知覺易用性有正向顯著影響，2.教師對行動學習教學之個人創新對知覺有用性有正向顯著影響，3.教師對行動學習教學之知覺易用性對知覺有用性有正向顯著影響，4.教師對行動學習教學之知覺易用性對態度有正向顯著影響，5.教師對行動學習教學之知覺有用性對態度有正向顯著影響。本研究獲致結果如下：1.知覺有用性直接影響態度；2.知覺易用性直接影響態度，亦可透過知覺有用性能影響態度；3.個人創新透過知覺易用性、知覺有用性影響態度。本研究結果將可作為行動學習教學策略訂定以及相關研究的參考。

Purpose of Study: When Distance Learning and Digital Learning move into Mobile Learning, the attitude of teachers integrating M-learning Technology into teaching should be concerned. Methodology: This study uses the ＂Documentary-historical Method＂ and conduct a survey research on teachers of high school, junior high school and primary school whom were selected as research objects, and the method of sampling is ＂Convenience Sampling,＂ by which collected 206 valid questionnaires. The results were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) in Amos 6. Findings/ Conclusions: After empirical analysis, the five research hypotheses are supported: (1) Teachers' Personal Innovativeness has a significant impact on perceived ease of use. (2) Teachers' Personal Innovativeness has a significant impact on perceived usefulness. (3) Teachers' perceived ease of use has a significant impact on perceived usefulness. (4) Teachers' perceived ease of use has a significant impact on attitude. (5) Teachers' perceived usefulness has a significant impact on attitude. Originality/value: The results obtained in this study are as follows: (1) Perceived usefulness directly affect attitude. (2) Perceived ease of use directly affect attitude; it also can have an influence on attitude through mediation variable perceived usefulness. (3) Personal Innovativeness have an influence on attitude through perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness. This study will be provided as a reference for the adoption of Mobile Learning (M-learning) strategies and related research.

1. Abu-Al-Aish, A.,Love, S.(2013).Factors influencing students’ acceptance of m-learning: An investigation in higher education.The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning,14(5),83-107.
2. Agarwal, R.,Karahanna, E.(2000).Time Flies When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs about Information Technology Usage.MIS Quarterly,24(4),665-694.
3. Agarwal, R.,Prasad, J.(1998).A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology.Information Systems Research,9(2),204-215.
4. Akgün, F.(2017).Investigation of Instructional Technology Acceptance and Individual Innovativeness of Academicians.Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry,8(3),291-322.
5. Althunibat, A.(2015).Determining the factors influencing students’ intention to use mlearning in Jordan higher education.Computers in Human Behavior,52,65-71.
6. Cheon, J.,Lee, S.,Crooks, S. M.,Song, J.(2012).An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior.Computers & Education,59(3),1054-1064.
7. Compeau, D.R.,Higgins, C.A.,Huff, S.(1999).Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: a longitudinal study.MIS Quarterly,23(2),145-158.
8. Davis, F.D.(1985).Cambridge, MA.,MIT Sloan School of Management.
9. Davis, F.D.(1989).Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology.MIS Quarterly,13(3),319-340.
10. Fishbein, M.,Ajzen, I.(1975).Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley.
11. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D. F.(1981).Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.Journal of Marketing Research,18(2),39-50.
12. GraphPad Software(2009). What is the meaning of * or ** or *** in reports of statistical significance from Prism or InStat?KNOWLEDGEBASE - ARTICLE #978. Retrieved from https://www.graphpad.com/support/faq/what-is-the-meaning-of-or-or-in-reports-of- statistical-significance-from-prism-or-instat/
13. Hamid, H. H. A.,Sherjawi, Z. A.,Omar, S.,Phon-Amnuaisuk, S.(2017).Student Acceptance and Attitude Towards Using 3D Virtual Learning Spaces.Computational Intelligence in Information Systems
14. Hsu, C. L.,Lu, H. P.(2004).Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience.Information and Management,41,853-868.
15. Huang, L.(2017).Acceptance of Mobile Learning in Classroom Instruction among College English Teachers in China Using an Extended TAM.2017 International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT)
16. Hussin, A. A.(2018).Education 4.0 Made Simple: Ideas for Teaching.International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies,6(3),92-98.
17. Jackson, C.M.,Chow, S.,Leitch, R.A.(1997).Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use an information system.Decision Sciences,28(2),357-389.
18. Kanfer, R.,Heggestad, E.D.(1997).Motivational traits and skills: a person-centered approach to work motivation.Research in Organizational Behavior,19,1-56.
19. Karimi, S.(2016).Do learners’ characteristics matter? An exploration of mobile-learning adoption in self-directed learning.Computers in Human Behavior,63,769-776.
20. Koivisto, K.,Makkonen, M.,Frank, L.,Riekkinen, J.(2016).Extending the Technology Acceptance Model with Personal Innovativeness and Technology Readiness : A Comparison of Three Models.BLED 2016 : Proceedings of the 29th Bled eConference "Digital Economy",Kranj:
21. Lewis, W.,Agarwal, R.,Sambamurthy, V.(2003).Sources of influence on beliefs about information technology use: an empirical study of knowledge workers.MIS Quarterly,27(4),657-679.
22. Liu, Y.,Li, H.,Carlsson, C.(2010).Factors driving the adoption of m-learning: An empirical study.Computer & Education,55,1214-1215.
23. Lu, J.,Yao, J.E.,Yu, C.S.(2005).Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless Internet services via mobile technology.Journal of Strategic Information Systems,14(2005),245-268.
24. Mac Callum, K.,Jeffrey, L.,Kinshuk(2014).Factors impacting teachers’ adoption of mobile learning.Journal of Information Technology Education: Research,13
25. Naismith, L.,Peter, L.,Giasemi, V.,Sharples, M.(2004).Literature review in mobile technologies and learning.Bristol:Futurelab.
26. Peck, B.,Deans, C.,Stockhausen, L.(2010).The Tin-Man and the TAM: A Journey Into M-Learning in the Land of Aus.World Journal on Educational Technology,2(1),16-26.
27. Peters, K.(2007).m-Learning: Positioning educators for a mobile, connected future.The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning,8(2),Article 2.
28. Raza, S. A.,Umer, A.,Qazi, W.,Makhdoom, M.(2017).The Effects of Attitudinal, Normative, and Control Beliefs on M-Learning Adoption Among the Students of Higher Education in Pakistan.Journal of Educational Computing Research,56(4),563-588.
29. Rogers, E. M.(1995).Diffusion of Innovations.New York:Free Press.
30. Sarrab,M.,Shibli, I, A.,Badursha, N.(2016).An Empirical Study of Factors Driving the Adoption of Mobile Learning in Omani Higher Education.International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning,17(4),331-349.
31. Uzunboylu, H.,Ozdamli, F.(2011).Teacher perception for m-learning: Scale development and teachers’perceptions.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,27(6),544-556.
32. Webster, J.,Martochhio, J.J.(1992).Microcomputer playfulness: development of a measure with workplace implications.MIS Quarterly,16(2),201-226.

1. 蘇竑彰,陳德霖,邱德原,邱紹群(2022)。玩賞YouTube雙語標竿EMI課程教學之實踐。管理實務與理論研究，16(2)，81-99。