题名 |
顏真卿《爭座位帖》版本問題略探 |
并列篇名 |
A Bibliographical Study on the Letter on the Controversy over Seating Protocol by Yan Zhenqing |
DOI |
10.29890/HJCN.201207.0009 |
作者 |
唐俊峰(Chun-Fung Tong) |
关键词 |
顏真卿 ; 爭座位帖 ; 考古類型學 ; 版本 ; Letter on the Controversy over Seating Protocol ; Yan Zhenqing ; archaeological typology ; bibliographical study ; versions |
期刊名称 |
暨南史學 |
卷期/出版年月 |
15期(2012 / 07 / 01) |
页次 |
1 - 44 |
内容语文 |
繁體中文 |
中文摘要 |
本文旨在對顏真卿《爭座位帖》之版本問題進行探討。《爭座位帖》因歷代刻本甚多,故如何處理不同刻本之年代,頓成一大問題。有見過往以個別字眼之殘泐作斷代標準的方法錯訛不少,本文乃適度採用了考古類型學中先分類分期後斷代的概念,對不同版本之《爭座位帖》的字體、書風進行比對,並據之將不同刻本分類。其後又嘗試對關中本之來源作出考述,考證出北宋時安師文兄弟之析居,雖令《爭座位帖》暫時一分為二,但安師文其後代又回購《爭座位帖》之殘餘部分,並於宋哲宗元祐年間前往汴京時,將《爭座位帖》之完整版本給予當時的著名文人觀看,從而令此帖之完整版本得以流傳;此應即今天廣泛流傳的關中本之來源。而以往吳中復重刻安氏石說,因敍事時序與史料存在矛盾,故應為後人猜想,非史之實。 |
英文摘要 |
Versions of the Letter on the Controversy over Seating Protocol (爭座位帖) had long been a puzzle in the study of Yan Zhenqing(顏真卿)'s calligraphy and thus attracted some great concerns amongst calligraphers and art collectors as early as Yuan, however, most of these efforts were proved to be doubtful and arbitrary. This short essay, therefore, attempts to provide a different angle to tackle this awkward question. Concepts in archaeological typology have been adopted, which involves a classification and dating amongst different versions in accordance with their respective writing styles. The essay further verifies the traditional view about the split of the Letter caused by the family division between An Shiwen(安師文) and his brother, and discovers that the Letter had been divided into two halve, which the latter one got purchased again by An Shiwen, who arrived in Kaifeng during the Yuanyou(元祐) period and generously loaned the complete version of the Letter to the famous literati in the capital, resulting in a wide spread the Letter. |
主题分类 |
人文學 >
歷史學 |
参考文献 |
|