學前特教教師專業評鑑資料之探究

The Study of Teacher Evaluation Data Sources for Early Childhood Special Educators

10.6475/JECE.201007.0223

鐘梅菁(Mei-Ching Chung)

教師專業評鑑 ； 評鑑資料 ； 學前特教教師 ； teacher evaluation ； data sources of teacher evaluation ； early childhood special educator

幼兒教育年刊

21期（2010 / 07 / 01）

223 - 244

繁體中文

理想的教師專業評鑑資料能夠展現教師專業的全貌，在教育部積極鼓勵學校申請試辦教師專業評鑑之際，本研究旨在瞭解學前特教教師對教師專業評鑑資料的意見，作為日後研擬教師專業評鑑方案之依據。研究採問卷調查方式，邀請各縣市學前特教教師參與，總計寄出問卷345份，回收214份，有效回收率達62%。回收問卷以描述性統計進行分析，研究結果發現：學前特教教師專業評鑑資料來源依據檢核重點而有不同，課程設計領域以教學檔案為主要資料來源，個別化教學領域以教學檔案為主要資料來源，教學經營領域以課堂觀察、教學檔案為主要資料來源，專業合作領域以訪談為主要資料來源。最後，依據研究結果對學前特教教師專業成長與教師專業評鑑提出相關建議。

The data sources for ideal teacher evaluation can present the expertise of the teachers. In view of this, the Ministry of Education encourages the schools to apply to carry out teacher evaluation. The purpose of the study is to explore the data sources of teacher evaluation for early childhood special educators in Taiwan. To fulfill the stated purpose, questionnaire was applied in research. The data collected from 214 special education teachers include special school teachers, special class teachers, inclusive class teachers and itinerant teachers in kindergarten. Data were analyzed through descriptive statistics. The results indicate (1) the data sources of teacher evaluation for early childhood special educators verify based on the different descriptors; (2) the primary data sources in four domains of teacher evaluation were found to come from (a) portfolio in curriculum design; (b) portfolio in individualized instruction domain; (c) class observation and portfolio in teaching management domain; (d) interview in professional cooperation domain. At last, based on the findings, some suggestions of this study are provided for references in implement for teacher evaluation program and in the future study.

1. 林惠芬(2002)。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計劃成果報告行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計劃成果報告,彰化縣:國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系。
   連結：
2. 鐘梅菁、江麗莉、陳清溪、陳麗如(2007)。學前特殊教育教師對教師專業評鑑意見之研究。特殊教育學報，25，161-184。
   連結：
3. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (2006). Early childhood generalist standards for the teachers of students ages 3-8. http://www.nbpts.org/index.cfm?t=downloader.cfm&id=596
4. 教育部（2008） 。教育部補助試辦教師專業發展評鑑實施要點。
5. 教育部（2009） 。特殊教育統計查詢。2009 年3 月30 日，取自 http://www.set.edu.tw/sta2/default.asp
6. Bartkowiak, E. T.(1996).New York, Buffalo, NY,State University.
7. Danielson, C.,McGreal, T. L.(2000).Teacher evaluation: To enhance professional practice.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
8. Duke, R. L.(1990).Beyond minimum competence: Evaluation for professional development.The new handbook of teacher evaluation-Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers,Newbury Park, CA:
9. Fenichel, E.(1992).Learning through supervision and mentorship to support the development of infants, toddlers and their families: A source book.Arlington, VA:Zero to Three.
10. Green, J. E.,Smyser, S. O.(1996).The teacher portfolio: A strategy for professional development and evaluation.Lancaster, PA:Technomic.
11. Hatfield, L. M.(1981).Inservice evaluation in early childhood education.Young Children,37(1),59-65.
12. Hayes, L.,Nikolic, V.,Cabaj, H.(2001).Am I teaching well?-Self-evaluation strategies for effective teachers.UK:Learning Matters Ltd..
13. Hill, D.(1982).,未出版
14. Hoot, J.,Bartkowiak, E.,Goupil, M. A.,Mercado, B.,Panepento, D.(1993).,未出版
15. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation(1994).The program evalualion standards.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
16. Kontos , S.,Diamond, K.(1997).Preparing practitioners to provide early intervention services in inclusive settings.Reforming personnel preparation in early intervention,Baltimore:
17. Lee, J. C.、Lam, W. P.、Li, Y. Y.(2004)。香港教師評鑑與效能：議題與挑戰。開啟課程評鑑對話掌握課程改革方向」學術研討會論文集，臺北縣:
18. Moya, S. A.,Gay, G.(1982).Evaluation of special education teachers.Teacher Education and Special Education,5(1),37-41.
19. Peterson, K. D.(2000).Teacher evaluation: A comprehensive guide to new directions and practices.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
20. Sanna, E.(2003).Special education teacher.Broomall, PA:Mason Crest.
21. Stork, S.,Engel, S.(1999).So, what is constructivist teaching? A rubric for teacher evaluation.Dimensions of Early Childhood,12,20-27.
22. Stronge, J. H.,Tucker, P. D.(2003).Handbook on teacher education: Assessing and improving performance.Larchmont, NY:Eye On Education.
23. Tucker, P. D.,Stronge, J. H.,Gareis, C. R.(2002).Handbook on teacher portfolio: For Evaluation and professional development.Larchmont, NY:Eye On Education.
24. Valentine, J.(1992).Principles and practices for effective teacher evaluation.Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
25. Valentine, J.W. (ed.)(1992).Principles and practices for effective teacher evaluation.Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
26. 刑敏華(1998)。臺灣區啟聰學校教師之教學溝通行為與所需具備之專業能力調查。特殊教育與復健學報，6，103-123。
27. 江明曄(1997)。啟智教育教師應具備的專業能力。特殊教育季刊，64，33-36。
28. 李翠玲(2007)。個別化教育計畫（IEP）理念與實施。臺北市:心理。
29. 陳聖謨(1997)。國小教師對教師專業評鑑制度之態度研究。初等教育學刊，10，417-441。
30. 黃麗君(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。新竹市，國立新竹教育大學幼兒教育研究所。
31. 劉文輝(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄市，國立高雄師範大學教育學系。
32. 鐘梅菁(2009)。學前特教教師對教師專業評鑑問題之看法。特殊教育叢書，9801，127-137。
33. 鐘梅菁(2001)。學前教師融合教育專業知能之研究。特殊教育學報，15，309-335。