臺中市國民中學實施游泳教學之調查研究

An Investigation of the Implementation of Swimming Teaching in Junior High Schools in Tai-Chung City

10.29897/DNSJ.201106.0009

羅鴻仁(Hung-Jen Lo)；蔡俊傑(Ju-Je Tsai)

游泳教學 ； Swimming teaching

興大體育學刊

11期（2011 / 06 / 01）

105 - 118

繁體中文

本研究主要目的在瞭解台中市國民中學游泳教學的現況。以問卷調查法填寫問卷，調查對象係以台中市21個區的50所國民中學實施游泳教學的相關承辦人員及國民中學一、二、三年級各3個班級學生為母群體，有效樣本人數計4,621人。回收資料以統計套裝軟體SPSS 10.0執行，採用描述性統計分析。經分析討論獲得以下結論：1.實施游泳教學學校僅剩11所，佔22%，比率偏低，高達87.95%的學生未能上游泳課程。2.負責體育行政工作者年齡45歲以下，佔86%，男性居多，10所學校委由合作之游泳池聘任的游泳教練擔任佔98%。3.僅有1所學校有游泳池佔2%，設備明顯不足。4.實施游泳教學阻礙因素中，以收費困難為最大阻礙因素，但比對實施與未實施的阻礙因素，對於學校實施游泳教學並無多大的影響，而在於學校願不願意配合執行。期盼藉由本研究結果所提出的具體建議，能塑造優質的學習環境。最後，也期許本研究結果提出對、教育與政府單位之建議，並說明後續研究可努力之方向。

The purposes of this study were to understand the current situation of junior high schools' swimming teaching in Tai-Chung City. Using questionnaires to investigate 50 junior high schools of students (there were 3 classes of each grade students participate in this research.) and staffs in Tai-Chung City as a parent sample, which was 4621 people. By using the 10.0 version of SPSS statistics program to analyze the investigation data. Descriptive statistics was used to analyze the data and statistic results show as below: 1. there were only 11 schools remaining on the implementation of swimming teaching, which was 22% of the whole. That means that 87.95% students were not able to obtain the swimming curriculum.2. There were 86% of sports administrators whose ages were under 45 years old, and the majority of them were male. There were 10 out of 11 schools employed the swimming coach outside of school, which were 98% of the whole.3. Only one school has a swimming pool (account for 2% of the whole), obviously the equipments were insufficient. 4. Although the factor of fee paying was the top list of the obstructive factors of swimming teaching implementation, this did not affect the implementation of swimming teaching in schools. The significant obstructive factor lies in the schools were willing to coordinate the implementation or not. Hope that result can promote study environment of quality. Expect Base on these findings, I make suggestions for school and government and proposed future research directions.

1. 陳冠錦(2002)。從「提昇學生游泳能力中程計畫」至落實學校游泳教學的具體措施。中華體育季刊，16(1)，129-136。
   連結：
2. 行政院衛生署（2005）。台灣地區歷年事故傷害予自殺死亡概況。資料引自 http://www.doh.gov.tw/。
3. 林玲珠(2002)。桃園縣，國立體育學院體育研究所。
4. 林雪麗（2005，3 月 2 日）。學生游泳檢測需學會換氣。民生報，A2。
5. 教育部(2001)。教育部（2001）。提升學生游泳能力中程計畫。台北市：林德榮。
6. 教育部（2006）。溺水事故事件累計死亡人數統計（92 年 1 月 1 日至 95 年 3 月 31 日）。資料引自 http://csrc.edu.tw/。
7. 教育部體育司（2003）。推動學生水域運動方案。資料引自http://service.chc.edu.tw/oceansports/modules/sections/
8. 陳秀華(2002)。台北市，台北市立體育學院運動科學研究所。
9. 陳武聰(2003)。屏東縣，國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所。
10. 楊武英(1996)。桃園縣，國立體育學院體育研究所。
11. 劉兆達(2001)。水上活動安全教育。學校體育，11(4)，31-35。
12. 劉俊宏、周志松（2005）。自救及簡易救生技能概論。校園游泳網。資料引自 http://www.happyswimmer.org.tw。

1. 蘇名傑,羅鴻仁,李居旺,尤仲明(2022)。臺中市國中生游泳學習成效與學習滿意度之研究。國立臺灣體育運動大學學報，11(1)，27-46。
2. 溫卓謀、章勝傑、胡銘志(2017)。偏鄉無泳池國小親水池蛙式游泳教學遷移模式之行動研究。成大體育，49(2)，34-52。