英文摘要
|
The value of "win" in sports world cannot simply be determined according to rules, and it also includes a lot of invisible spirits and aesthetics. If sports world is not decomposed, such complicated factors make it impossible for the author to explore the value of "win." Therefore, according to the concepts proposed by Descartes and Kant, this study decomposed sports world by using the methods and rules of Descartes. Firstly, this study decomposed "win" into "motivation to participate in sports" and "sports regulations." Secondly, this study decomposed "motivation to participate in sports" into "internal good" and "external good" proposed by the philosopher MacIntyre, and decomposed "sports regulations" into "formal fair play" and "informal fair play." Moreover, this study also tested the four dimensions according to Kant's three principles of morality: 1) "true morality" (währe Tugend) with both senses of aesthetics and sublime; 2) “nominal morality” (adoptirte Tugend) with only sense of aesthetics; 3) "moral illusion" (Tugend scheinen) without senses of aesthetics and sublime. Thirdly, this study performed comparative investigations on true sports stories. Lastly, this study introduced the concept of "three kinds of life of human beings," and used the pursuit of spiritual life as the end. According to the investigation results mentioned above, the value of "win" in sports world should not be judged according to external regulations, and it is the intertwined perception and feeling between people and sports world. Besides, value cannot be replaced by fact, and it should be established on true moral. Kant’s philosophy suggests that what human beings perceive is merely "phenomena," instead of "thing-in-itself." Human beings cannot approach the true authenticity (thing-in-itself) unless they constantly construct authenticity (phenomena). The author’s motivation to write this paper is not to deny the pursuit of "win" in sports world, but to enable readers to get closer to the true value in sports world with the author’s construction.
|
参考文献
|
-
Annas, Julia、王幸麗譯(2008)。亞里斯多德論德行與幸福。哲學與文化,35(4),157-170。
連結:
-
文多斌(2010)。從康德「實踐理性批判」論運動道德的可能性。臺灣體育學術研究,48,97-114。
連結:
-
“Boston Marathon Bombing Amputee Makes Improbable Journey,” CBS NEWS, , 20 Apr. 2015.
-
“Honesty of the Long-Distance Runner,” EL PAIS, , 12 Dec. 2012.
-
“Marathon Runner Crawls to Finish Line After Collapsing,” BBC NEWS, , 18 Feb. 2015.
-
桑塔耶那、杜若洲譯(1971)。美感。臺北:晨鐘。
-
康德、李明輝譯(1990)。道德底形上學之基礎。臺北:聯經。
-
曹俊峰(2003)。康德美學導論。臺北:水牛。
-
笛卡兒、黃金穗譯(1959)。方法導論。臺北:協志工業叢書。
-
笛卡兒、錢志純譯(1972)。我思故我在。臺北:志文。
-
許立宏(2000)。運動的內存善及道德教育。中華體育,14(2),10-18。
-
許立宏(2000)。運動的公平競爭與欺騙。中華體育季刊,14(3),1-7。
-
陳東(2008)。偉大,蘊藏在奧林匹克的堅持中─記中華臺北隊跆拳道女子57公斤級選手蘇麗文。兩岸關係,9,63-64。
-
黃光國(2003)。社會科學的理路。臺北:心理。
-
蘇麗文(2006)。2006年杜哈亞運奪金歷程故事。競技運動,8(2),77-78。
|