合作學習及精熟學習對大學生之籃球技能學習成效

Comparisons between Cooperative Learning and Mastering Learning for Basketball Performance of Collegial Students

10.7074/YDAJB.201109.0019

吳家碧(Chia -Pi Wu)

教學策略 ； 體育課程 ； 體育教學 ； teaching strategy ； physical education program ； physical education teaching

育達科大學報

28期（2011 / 09 / 01）

17 - 27

繁體中文

本研究目的旨在探討不同教學策略與不同能力組別學生籃球學習成效之交互作用情形。研究對象為北部某科科技大學籃球選修課學生，合計120人，採用2×3因子設計（學習策略ｘ技能水準），研究方法為實驗研究法，資料分析採用平均數、標準差、單因子變異數分析、雙因子變異數分析，研究結果指出：一、合作學習組中，高能力組及高低能力組學生之籃球技能學習成效優於低能力組學生；精熟學習組中，高能力組及高低能力組學生之籃球技能學習成效優於低能力組學生；二、合作學習組學生之學習成效優於精熟學習組；三、高能力組及高低能力組學生之學習成效皆優於低能力組。結論：合作學習組學生之籃球技能學習成效優於精熟學習組學生，未來體育教師可以利用合作學習之教學策略，提升學生的籃球學習成效，亦可將異質學生（高低能力）分成一組，提升學生之學習成效。

The purpose of this study was to compare the basketball performances between cooperative learning and mastering learning. The subjects were 120 students who selected the basketball programs, and those were divide 6 groups, such as cooperative learning group-high level, cooperative learning group-low level, cooperative learning group-combinative level, mastery learning group- high level, mastery learning group- low level, and mastery learning group- combinative level. The research method was experimental method. Those data were analyzed by average, standard deviation, one-way ANOVA, and 2-way ANOVA. The results were as in the following: (a) the basketball performances of cooperative learning grouphigh level, and cooperative learning group-combinative level were better than it of cooperative learning group-low level. In addition, the basketball performances of mastering learning group-high level, and mastering learning group-combinative level were better than it of mastering learning group-low level. (2) The basketball performance of cooperative learning group was better than it of mastering leaning group. (3) The basketball performances of high level group and combinative level group were better than it of low level group. In summary, the basketball performance of cooperative learning group was better than it of mastering group. It advised that physical education teachers could use the cooperative learning strategy to improve the basketball learning of the low ability students.

1. 洪新來(2007)。獎勵結構與親和力在合作學習成效之研究。體育學報，24，39-52。
   連結：
2. 鄭麗媛(2008)。合作學習與訊息策略運用對韻律體操動作技能學習成效之影響。體育學報，41(3)，69-80。
   連結：
3. Beane, W. D.,Lemke, E. A.(1971).Group variables influencing the transfer of conceptual psychology.Journal of Educational Psychology,62(3),215-218.
4. Blakemore, C. L,Hilton, H.G,Pellette, T.L.(1992).Comparison of taught skills using mastery and nonmastery learning methods.Journal of teaching in physical education,11(3),235-247.
5. Bloom, B. S.(1976).Human characteristics and school learning.New York:McGraw-Hill.
6. Bulter, J.I.(Ed.),Griffin, L.L.(Ed.)(2005).Teaching games for understandung: Theory, research, and practive.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
7. Cury, F.,Fonseca, D.,Rufo, M.,Sarrazin, P.(2002).Perceptions of competence, implicit theory of ability, perception of motivational climate, and achievement goals: a test of the trichotomous conceptualization of endorsement of achievement motivation in the physical education setting.Perceptual and Motor Skills,95(1),233-244.
8. Darst, P. W.(Ed.),Zakrajsek, D. B.(Ed.),Mancini, V. J.(Ed.)(1989).Analyzing physical education and sport Instruction.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
9. Dyson, B.,Griffin, L. L.,Hastie, P.(2004).Sport education, tactical game, and cooperative learning: Theoretical and pedagogical considerations.Quest,56,226-240.
10. Guskey, T.R.,Pigott, T.D.(1988).Research on group-based mastery learning programs: A meta-analysis.Journal of Educational Research,81,197-216.
11. Hooper, S.(1992).Effects of peer interaction during computer-based mathematics instruction.Journal of Educational Research and Development,85(3),180-189.
12. Johnson, D. W.,Johnson, R. T.(1993).Cooperative learning and feedback in technology-based instruction.Interactive instruction and feedback,Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
13. Mevarech, Z.R.(1991).Learning mathematics in different "mastery" environments.Journal of Educational Research,84,225-231.
14. Mevarech, Z.R.(1985).The effects of cooperative mastery learning strategies on mathematics achievement.Journal of Educational Research,78,372-378.
15. Nath, L. R.,Ross, S. M.(2001).The influence of a training model for implementing cooperative groupings with elementary students.Journal of Educational Technology Research and Development,49(2),41-56.
16. Okely, A.D.,Booth, M.L.(2004).Mastery of fundamental movement skills among children in New South Wales: prevalence and socio demographic distribution.Journal of science and medicine in sport,7(3),358-372.
17. Owens, D.,Bunker, L. K.(1995).Basketball to success.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc..
18. Parish, L.E.,Treasur, D.C.(2003).Physical activity and situational motivation in physical education: influence of the motivational climate and perceived ability.Research quarterly for exercise and sport,74(2),173-182.
19. Simsek, A.,Sales, G. C.(1993).The effects of instructional control on achievement, confidence, and attitudes In computer-based cooperative and individual learning.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction,20(3),81-86.
20. Slavin, R. E.(1991).Synthesis of research on cooperative learning.Educational Leadership,48(5),408-422.
21. Slavin, R. E.,Karweit, N. L.(1984).Mastery learning and student teams: A factorial experiment in urban general mathematics classes.American Educational Research Journal,21,725-736.
22. Webb, N.M.(1982).Peer interaction and learning in small cooperative groups.Journal of Educational Psychology,74,642-655.
23. Webb, N.M,Enter, P.,Lewis, S.(1986).Problem-solving strategies and group processes in small groups learning computer programming.American Educational Research Journal,23,246-261.
24. 國立臺灣師範大學學校體育研究與發展中心（編）(1997).籃球：教材教法與評量.台北:教育部.
25. 黃政傑,林佩璇(1995).合作學習.台北市:五南.
26. 黃清雲(1998)。掌握有效合作學習要素創造體育教學新境界。臺灣省學校體育，8(3)，4-13。

1. 高俊傑(2012)。學生小組成就區分法對籃球策略認知與學習動機影響之探討。臺灣運動教育學報，7(2)，23-40。