商業談判風格量表編製與信效度之研究

The Development of Reliability and Validity on Negotiation Style Scales (NSS)

凃宥德(Yu-Te Tu)；張玉宜(Yu-Yi Chang)

談判風格 ； 探索性因素分析 ； 驗證性因素分析 ； Negotiation styles ； EFA ； CFA

育達科大學報

34期（2013 / 04 / 01）

241 - 259

繁體中文

國外已有許多學者編製談判風格評量工具，但由國內學者編製並適用於談判風格之量表卻不多見。本研究主要目的在依量表編製程序，發展出一套具信、效度且適用於區別不同風格的談判人員之量表。研究結果顯示項目分析未有題目因不具鑑別力而需刪除。在試題與各構面整份測驗之間的相關統計分析，考慮將題項 q106、q107、q206、q306刪除。探索性分析結果和試題與各構面整份測驗之間的相關統計分析交叉比對後，確認將此四題予以刪除。本研究之觀察變數符合單變數常態分佈；一階模型具收斂效度與區別效度；變異數分析結果並無違犯估計之情況；了解結構模式與資料適配性之一階與二階驗證性因素分析檢定值之指標皆達標準。由結果發現本量表在信度與效度考驗上具備了良好量表之特性。該量表實務上可應用於商業談判以區別不同風格的談判人員，進而採取不同談判策略，使談判結果達到雙方之共識與利益。在學術應用上，不僅可供研究者擴展相關知能，未來研究更可進一步評估與比較各商業談判風格量表現況與實務上的差異。

Many foreign scholars have developed the assessment tools of negotiating styles, but domestic scholars for the field is rare. The purpose of this study is in accordance with the scale developing procedures to provide with reliability and validity of instrument for distinguishing different negotiation styles. The results indicate that the variables are univariate normality distribution; this evidence supports the convergent and discriminant validity of the first-order model; and the overall structural fit results of these analyses showed that the first- and second- models provide a reasonable fit. The study found that the instrument has the characteristics of a good scale reliability and validity test. This will help enterprises to distingush different negotiation styles from counterparties in order to employ different strategies, and thus to achieve both the consensus and interests from the negotiation process. In academic applications, researchers can be not only for expansion related knowledge and skills, but also further assessment and comparison the instrument and practical differences in the future study.

1. Anson, R. G.,Jelassi, M. T.(1990).A Development Framework for Computer-Supported Conflict Resolution.European Journal of Operational Research,46(2),181-199.
2. Bazerman, M.,Carroll, J.(1987).Negotiation Cognition.Research in Organizational Behavior,9,247-288.
3. Beam, C.,Segev, A.(1996).,Fisher Center for Information Technology Management. University of California Berkeley.
4. Bentler, P. M.(1992).On the Fit of Models to Covariance and Methodology to the Bulletin.Psychological Bulletin,112(3),400-404.
5. Blake, R.,Mouton, S. J.(1964).The Managerial Grid.Houston:Gulf Publishing Company.
6. Bullen, K. A.(ed.),Long, J. S.(ed.)(1993).Testing Structural Equation Models.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
7. Cureton, E. E.(1957).The upper and lower twenty-seven percent rule.Psychometrika,22,293-296.
8. Deane, P.、Reynolds, R.(2004)。Eigo negotiation no kihon skill。Japan:Asahi Shuppan-Sha。
9. Ding, L.,Velicer, W. F.,Harlow, L. L.(1995).Effects of estimation methods, number indicators per factor, and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices.Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,2(2),119-144.
10. Farazmand, F.,Tu, Y. T.,Daneefard, H.(2012).A Comparative Study of Negotiation Styles: Afghanistan, Iran and Syria.Journal of International Business Research,11(2),61-72.
11. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D. F.(1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of marketing Research,18,39-50.
12. Gerbing, D. W.,Anderson, J. C.(1992).Monte Carlo evaluations of goodness of fit indices for structural equation models.Sociological Methods Research,21(2),132-160.
13. Hair, J. F.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.,Black, W. C.(2009).Multivariate data analysis.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
14. Hair, J. F.,Black, W. C.,Babin, B. J.,Anderson, R. E.(2010).Multivariate data analysis.Pearson, NJ:Pearson Education Inc..
15. Hinkin, T. R.(1995).A review of scale development practices in the study of organization.Journal of Management,21(5),967-988.
16. Hofstede, G.(1980).Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related values.Beverly Hill, CA:Sage Publications.
17. Hofstede, G.,Bond, M. H.(1988).The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth.Organizational Dynamics,16(4),4-21.
18. Jöreskog, K. G.,Sörbom, D.(1992).LISREL: A Guide to the Program and Applications.Chicago:Scientific Software International, Inc..
19. Kelley, T. L. (1939). The selection of upper and lower groups for the validation of test items. Journal of Education Psychology, 30, 17-24.
20. Kline, R. B.(2005).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.New York:Guilford.
21. Lewicki, R. J.,Saunders, M. D.,Minton, W. J.(1999).Negitiation.Irwin McGraw-Hill.
22. Loehlin, J. C.(2004).Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. MacCallum, R. C.,Hong, S.(1997).Power Analysis in Covariance Structure modeling using.Multivariate Behavioral Research,32(2),193-210.
24. Olekalns, M.,Smith, P. L.,Walsh, T.(1996).The process of negotiating: Strategies, timing and outcomes.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,67,68-76.
25. Pearson, D. S.(1995).New Mexico State University.
26. Pruitt, D. G.(1981).Negotiation Behavior.New York:Academic Press Inc..
27. Pruitt, D. G.,Rubin, J. Z.(1986).Social Conflict: Escalation, stalement and settlement.New York:Random House.
28. Riggs, H. E.(1983).Managing High-Technology Companies.New York:Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
29. Torkzadeh, G.,Koufteros, X.,Pflughoeft, K.(2003).Comfirmatory analysis of computer self-efficacy.Structural Equation Modeling,10(2),263-175.
30. Walton, R.,McKersie, R.(1965).A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations.New York:McGraw Hill Book Co..
31. Wu, M. L.(2009).Structural equation modeling: Amos operation and application.Taipei, Taiwan:Wu-Nan Book Inc..
32. 吳松齡(2004).企業談判理論與實務.滄海書局出版社.
33. 李茂能(2006).結構方程模式軟體 Amos 之簡介及其在測驗編製上之應用.理出版社.
34. 邱皓政(2003).結構方程模式：LISREL 的理論、技術與應用.台北:雙葉.
35. 邱皓政(2002).量化研究與統計分析：SPSS 中文視窗版資料分析範例解析.台北:五南.
36. 張列經(2003)。中國人的跨文化談判。長榮大學學，7，145-154。
37. 張茂森(1996).如何成為談判高手.台北:漢昇書屋.
38. 張簡鴻藝(2008)。玄奘大學國際企業學系。
39. 陳漢鵬(2008)。國立東華大學國際企業學系。
40. 劉必榮(1996).談判聖經.商周出版.
41. 劉必榮(1993).談判.台北:時報文化出版企業有限公司.