| 题名 |
墨、荀正義觀之比較－以職場倫理為導向的探討 |
| 并列篇名 |
A Comparison of the Views of Justice between Mosi and Xunzi - A Study Based on Ethics in the Workplace |
| 作者 |
葉冰心(Yeh Bin-Hsin) |
| 关键词 |
墨子 ； 荀子 ； 義 ； 尚同 ； 明分使群 ； Mozi ； Xunzi ； Yi ； Delegate staff accordingly ； classificaty cleanly for gregariousness |
| 期刊名称 |
育達科大學報 |
| 卷期/出版年月 |
47期（2019 / 06 / 01） |
| 页次 |
119 - 136 |
| 内容语文 |
繁體中文 |
| 中文摘要 |
公平、正義乃當今社會首要之人倫規範，不唯於制度釐訂之基礎，更為人、我間最基本之行為法則。今者以公平、正義源於西方觀念，並以之為圭臬，實則，中國於先秦即有論及公平、正義者，其中墨子與荀子即以正義其主要論說。墨子以亂起於人之不相愛而提出兼愛主張，而兼愛背後乃是以義為基礎；其以人之不相愛起於各執己義，故為亂之源，由是於制度上建立自上而下明斷、統合眾義，自下而上層層負責、服從決策之政治結構。荀子則就社會整體觀點，以明分使群釐訂事務之內涵及所承之責，而人即依己天生自然之才性從事適當之職務，呈現出唯齊非齊之社會正義觀。觀此二者皆立基於「義」而為制度之制定，洽為今日職場之結構及發展走向。本文透過與孔、孟之比較而為墨、荀正義觀念之解析，以之為當今職場各階層權分與職分、權利與義務釐清之借鏡。 |
| 英文摘要 |
Equity and justice is the most important norms of human relations nowadays. It's not only the basis of system development, but also the basic code of conduct among people. Most people regarded equity and justice as Western ideas. In fact, China has been discussed the idea of justice in the pre-Qin (先秦) dynasty. Mozi (墨子) and Xunzi (荀子) took justice as their main discourse. Mo Tzu believes social chaos due to people can't care for all people equally, therefore he proposed the idea of universal love, which is based on the righteousness. People can't care for all people equally is because everyone is opinionated. Disagreement causes confusion. From superior position to inferior position, the superior should establish clear and fair judgment and integrate all opinions. In order to eliminate confusion, the inferior should be responsible for the superior to establish a political structure of obeying decisions. From the viewpoint of society as a whole, Xunzi, set the guidance and responsibility to be borne by everyone. People share out the work and cooperate with one another. Therefore people can choose appropriate work according to their innate natural talent in the proper position. Although seemingly inequality, it is the actual social equality and justice. The interpretation of righteousness by Mozi and Xunzi, it's truly the trend of workplace structure and workplace development nowadays. In this research, by comparing the philosophy of Confucius (孔子) and Mencius (孟子) to analyze the concept of righteousness of Mozi and Xunzi and to clarify the rights and obligations of workplace. |
| 主题分类 |
人文學 >
人文學綜合 基礎與應用科學 > 數學 基礎與應用科學 > 資訊科學 基礎與應用科學 > 永續發展研究 工程學 > 市政與環境工程 社會科學 > 社會科學綜合 社會科學 > 教育學 |
| 参考文献 |
|
