國中卡巴迪選手團隊凝聚力、團隊信任、運動涉入對訓練滿意度之影響

The Impact of Junior High School Kabaddi Athletes' Team Cohesion, Team Trust, Sport Involvement on Training Satisfaction

洪維廷(Wei-Ting Hung)；林展緯(Jan-Wei Lin)；黃瑞榮(Ruey-Rong Huang)

卡巴迪 ； 凝聚力 ； 團隊涉入 ； 團隊信任 ； 滿意度 ； Kabaddi ； cohesion ； team involvement ； team trust ； satisfaction

休閒運動健康評論

9卷2期（2020 / 09 / 30）

48 - 62

繁體中文

本研究在探討卡巴迪選手在團隊凝聚力、團隊信任、運動涉入的差異分析，並驗證團隊凝聚力、團隊信任、運動涉入及訓練滿意度之間關係。以108學年度全國中等學校卡巴迪選手為研究對象，共收集九所國中247位卡巴迪選手問卷資料。經統計分析結果顯示：（一）年級變項在團隊凝聚力及運動涉入變項未達顯著性差異，在團隊信任達顯著差異。（二）性別變項在運動涉入及團隊信任變項未達顯著性差異，在團隊凝聚力達顯著差異。（三）訓練年資變項在運動涉入變項未達顯著性差異，在團隊凝聚力及團隊信任達顯著差異。（四）是否得獎變項在運動涉入及團隊信任變項未達顯著性差異，在團隊凝聚力達顯著差異。（五）每次訓練時間變項在團隊凝聚力、運動涉入及團隊信任變項皆未達顯著性差異。（六）選手團隊凝聚力會正向影響團隊信任，團隊凝聚力會正向影響運動涉入，團隊凝聚力會正向影響訓練滿意度，團隊信任會正向影響訓練滿意度，運動涉入會正向影響訓練滿意度。（七）團隊凝聚力、團隊信任、運動涉入等變項能解釋卡巴迪國中選手訓練滿意度變項的67%解釋變異量。

This research adopted a differential analysis approach to explore how training satisfaction correlates to background variables of junior high school kabaddi athletes' team cohesion, team trust, and sports involvement. The 2019 roster of national junior high school kabaddi athletes were targeted, and 249 players from nine junior high schools were distributed questionnaires for data collection. Statistical analysis based on the data collected shows the following results. 1) The age variable shows no significant difference in team cohesion and sports involvement, but it has reached a significant difference in team trust. 2) The gender variable did not reach a significant difference in terms of sport involvement and team trust but has reached a significant difference in terms of team cohesion. 3) The training portfolio variable did not reach a significant difference in terms of sport involvement but has reached a significant difference in terms of team cohesion and team trust. 4) Award attainment did not show a significant difference in sports involvement and team trust but has reached a significant difference in team cohesion. 5) The training schedule variable did not show significant differences in team cohesion, sports involvement, and team trust. 6) The athletes' team cohesion brings a positive impact on team trust, and team cohesion has a positive impact on sports involvement. Team cohesion has a positive influence on training satisfaction. Team trust has a positive impact on training satisfaction. Sports involvement has a positive impact on training satisfaction. 7) Team cohesion, team trust, and sport involvement variables explain the 67% explained variance for the training satisfaction variable among junior high school Kabaddi athletes.

1. 乃慧芳(2013)。田徑選手運動動機、運動涉入及流暢體驗之研究。運動教練科學，30，53-66。
   連結：
2. 陳文銓(2005)。室内温水游泳池消费者之涉入程度, 體驗滿意度及忠誠度之相關研究─以高高屏地區室内温水游泳池為例。輔仁大學體育學刊，4，81-98。
   連結：
3. Bollen, K. A.(2005).Structural equation models in encyclopedia of biostatistics.Atlanta, GA:American Cancer.
4. Cartwright, D.,Zander, A. F.(1960).Group dynamics: Research and theory.New York:Harper & Row Peterson.
5. Chelladurai, P.,Riemer, H. A.(1997).A classification of facets of athlete satisfaction.Journal of Sport Management,11(2),133-159.
6. Chin, W. W.(1998).The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling.Modern Methods for Business Research,295(2),295-336.
7. DeLamater, J.,Ward, A.(2013).Handbook of social psychology.Netherlands:Springer.
8. Evans, C. R.,Dion, K. L.(1991).Group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis.Small Group Research,22(2),175-186.
9. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D. F.(1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research,18(1),39-50.
10. Geringer, J. M.,Frayne, C. A.(1993).Self‐efficacy, outcome expectancy and performance of international joint venture general managers.Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration,10(4),322-333.
11. Hair, J. F.,Black, W. C.,Babin, B. J.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.(2010).Multivariate data analysis.Upple Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
12. Kyle, G. T.,Mowen, A. J(2005).An examination of the leisure involvement—agency commitment relationship.Journal of Leisure Research,37(3),342-363.
13. Morgan, D.,Zeffane, R.(2003).Employee involvement, organizational change and trust in management.International Journal of Human Resource Management,14(1),55-75.
14. Venkatesh, V.,Thong, J. Y.,Xu, X.(2012).Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology.MIS Quarterly,157-178.
15. Wiley, C. G.,Shaw, S. M.,Havitz, M. E.(2000).Men's and women's involvement in sports: An examination of the gendered aspects of leisure involvement.Leisure Sciences,22(1),19-31.
16. 李冠諭(2017)。雲林縣，國立雲林科技大學。
17. 周正寅(2005)。新北市，輔仁大學。
18. 林炳勳(2010)。臺東縣，國立臺東大學。
19. 林博文(2006)。臺北市，臺北巿立體育學院。
20. 高禎璟(2012)。嘉義縣，南華大學。
21. 莊斐旻(2013)。高雄市，義守大學。
22. 陳永祥(2011)。排球選手運動目標取向對團隊凝聚力影響之研究─以九十八學年度男子組公開三級選手為例。遠東學報，28(1)，29-39。
23. 陳琴嘉(2018)。臺東縣，國立臺東大學。
24. 陳鼎華(2006)。臺北市，臺北巿立體育學院。
25. 曾華芳(2016)。彰化縣，大葉大學。
26. 黃士魁(2000)。臺北市，中國文化大學。
27. 黃世昌(2010)。臺東縣，國立臺東大學。
28. 劉雅燕(2007)。臺北市，臺北巿立體育學院。
29. 蔡志鵬(2017)。臺北市國小網球選手團隊凝聚力與訓練滿意度之研究。金門體育學報，1(1)，36-47。
30. 蔡英美,王俊明(2008)。大專甲組選手知覺的家長式領導、情緒感受、團隊承諾及團隊凝聚力之研究。文化體育學刊，6，91-99。
31. 鄭敏雄(1992)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
32. 簡佑娟(2004)。臺南市，崑山科技大學。

1. 陳春安,邱榮貞,杜珈霖(2023)。運動樂趣、涉入程度與學習滿意度之關係研究－以樂趣化排球課程為例。運動與遊憩研究，18(2)，1-16。
2. (2024)。卡巴迪運動行銷策略之探討。休閒運動健康評論，13(2)，106-113。