國際商務仲裁之仲裁容許性問題:兼論統一規則建構

李婉齊

doi:10.6342/NTU201603868

山西大学，您好！

感谢采购，人社期刊库｜人社论文库，期间：2025/01/01~2025/12/31

感谢试用，科学期刊库｜科学论文库，期间：2024/10/20~2025/01/20

浏览高级检索

关闭
检索检索高级检索出版物检索
浏览期刊主题浏览核心期刊浏览期刊拼音浏览

关闭

查询符号(半角)	查询符号意义说明
空格	表示为「AND」两个查询词之交集
双引号 ( " " )	片语以双引号标示开始及结束，而且只寻找出现顺序相同的字词，例： " image process "
?	表示一个字母切截，输入两个?表两个字母，依此类推，例：输入「Appl?」，查得结果应为appl e , appl y … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
*	表示不限字母切截，由0~n. 例：输入「appl*」，查得结果应为appl e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
AND、OR、NOT	布尔逻辑组合关键字，用来扩大或缩小查询范围的技巧。 (1) AND ：缩小查询范围 (2) OR ：扩大查询范围(3) NOT：排除不相关的范围

DOI 是数位物件识别码（ D igital O bject I dentifier ）的简称，
为物件在网路上的唯一识别码，可用于永久连结并引用目标物件。

使用DOI作为永久连结

每个DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」便成为永久网址。
如以DOI号为 10.5297/ser.1201.002 的文献为例，此文献的永久连结便是： http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
日后不论出版单位如何更动此文献位置，永久连结所指向的位置皆会即时更新，不再错失重要的研究。

引用含有DOI的文献

有DOI的文献在引用时皆应同时引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未规范DOI的引用格式，可引用DOI永久连结。

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考（）。

书目管理工具

相关连结

问题回报

全文下载

国际商务仲裁之仲裁容许性问题:兼论统一规则建构

Issues of Arbitrability in International Commercial Arbitration：Possibility of Creation of Uniform Rules

李婉齐 , 硕士　　导师：罗昌发　　

繁体中文 DOI： 10.6342/NTU201603868

国际商务仲裁；仲裁容许性；禁止仲裁；纽约公约；国际商事仲裁示范法；诉讼； international commercial arbitration ； arbitrability ； non-arbitrability ； New York Convention ； UNCITRAL Model Law ； litigation

0 个人觉得这篇文章赞

摘要 │ 参考文献 (107) │ 国际计量

摘要〈TOP〉

并列摘要〈TOP〉

This thesis addresses the issues of arbitrability. Arbitrability is not only a condition of the validity of arbitration agreements, but also constitutes the grounds for refusing recognition or enforcement, or setting aside the arbitral awards under the New York Convention and the UNCITRAL Model Law. Considering there is no consensus among countries on determining the question of arbitrability so far, neither the New York Convention nor the Model Law providing guidance, the purpose of this thesis is to find some possible approaches, to decrease the legal uncertainties and risks arising out of arbitrability.
    In international trade and commerce, arbitration has nowadays become increasingly popular and widely accepted as a means of resolving disputes. Most countries have liberalized their attitude to arbitration. However, disputes involved exercise of government authority, public interests, mandatory rules, weak parties, or the third party, still be concerned or criticized as arbitrable in some region; on the other hand, limitations to arbitrability might derogate the principle of party autonomy, and conflicts to the trend of pro-arbitration policy which the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law have recognized, that again appears the dilemma of whether some certain disputes should be arbitrable.
    Traditionally, most discussion regarding to arbitrability divided into such substantive issues as securities, corporate, antitrust, patent disputes. By observing and analyzing those grounds usually taken as challenging the arbitrability, this thesis argues that, the nature of arbitrablility issues are in connection with the limitations of the arbitration procedure itself, that is, party autonomy, confidence, final and binding, ex aequo et bono principle, business consideration, etc. In other words, these principle and characteristics make arbitration unsuccessful to respond to the specific needs of some disputes, and triggering the controversies of arbitrability.
     The thoughts of constructing uniform rules for arbitrability has once been mentioned in the United Nations International Trade Commission resolution, and recently be called by some scholars as well. To give consideration to both pro-arbitration policy and concerns above, this thesis attempts to propose a list of non-arbitrable disputes, and the grounds for non-arbitrability. In addition, the thesis argues that the arbitrability issues are not only about whether the dispute is arbitrable, but also how flexible the arbitration procedure can be. Thus, the thesis suggests to introduce some public hearing, third-party participation procedures in arbitration, to solve the problems, and at the same time decrease the negative impact of limiting arbitration.
      The author suggests, making it clear of where is the line between arbitrable and non-arbitrable disputes, and constructing some uniform rules and amending arbitration procedures if need be, will benefit the development of arbitration in the long run.

参考文献 ( 107 ) 〈TOP〉

曾宛如 (2012)。《证券交易法原理》，台北：元照。
连结：
吴光明 (2006)。〈仲裁协议之自由与限制-兼论争议之可仲裁性〉，《财产法暨经济法》， 8期，页1-27。
连结：
林金荣 (2004)。〈证券终止上市之公权力性质及其仲裁容许性争议之研究--最高法院九十一年台上字第二三六七号判决评释〉，《律师杂志》，297期，页48-61。
连结：
林彩瑜 (2014)。〈国际投资仲裁程序与公共卫生之关联：以菸品控制争端为例〉，《台大法学论丛》，43 卷 3 期，页 549-585。
连结：
许家诚(2015)。〈TPP草案投资仲裁之新发展〉，《万国法律》，204期，页74-78。
连结：

国际计量

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

文章公开取用时，将寄通知信至您填写的信箱地址

E-mail ：

使用DOI作为永久连结

引用含有DOI的文献

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。 如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考 （ ） 。

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考（）。