參與科技專案廠商之組織學習、社會資本與技術移轉之實證研究

方世杰; 林麗娟

doi:10.6504/JOM.2005.22.03.02

山西大学，您好！

感谢采购，人社期刊库｜人社论文库，期间：2024/01/01~2024/12/31

感谢试用，科学期刊库｜科学论文库，期间：2024/10/20~2025/01/20

浏览高级检索

关闭
检索检索高级检索出版物检索
浏览期刊主题浏览核心期刊浏览期刊拼音浏览

关闭

查询符号(半角)	查询符号意义说明
空格	表示为「AND」两个查询词之交集
双引号 ( " " )	片语以双引号标示开始及结束，而且只寻找出现顺序相同的字词，例： " image process "
?	表示一个字母切截，输入两个?表两个字母，依此类推，例：输入「Appl?」，查得结果应为appl e , appl y … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
*	表示不限字母切截，由0~n. 例：输入「appl*」，查得结果应为appl e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
AND、OR、NOT	布尔逻辑组合关键字，用来扩大或缩小查询范围的技巧。 (1) AND ：缩小查询范围 (2) OR ：扩大查询范围(3) NOT：排除不相关的范围

DOI 是数位物件识别码（ D igital O bject I dentifier ）的简称，
为物件在网路上的唯一识别码，可用于永久连结并引用目标物件。

使用DOI作为永久连结

每个DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」便成为永久网址。
如以DOI号为 10.5297/ser.1201.002 的文献为例，此文献的永久连结便是： http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
日后不论出版单位如何更动此文献位置，永久连结所指向的位置皆会即时更新，不再错失重要的研究。

引用含有DOI的文献

有DOI的文献在引用时皆应同时引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未规范DOI的引用格式，可引用DOI永久连结。

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考（）。

ACI:

数据来源：Academic Citation Index，简称ACI

台湾最大的引用文献资料库，目前收录台湾与港澳地区所出版的人文学、社会学领域学术期刊之书目资料与参考文献，总期刊量超过690种，每年定期公布收录期刊的影响指数(Impact Factor)等指标给大众，并提供专家学者与学术单位实用的计量与分析功能。

五年影响指数（5-Year Impact Factor）：某一期刊前五年所出版的文章在当年度的平均被引用次数。

公式：（前五年发表论文在统计年的被引用次数）÷（前五年论文产出论文总篇数）

例如：A期刊2017年之五年影响指数

(A期刊2012-2016年发表论文在2017年的被引总次数)/(A期刊2012-2016年发表的论文总数)

什么是预刊文章？

为提供读者最前线之学术资讯，于期刊文献获同意刊登后、纸本印制完成前，率先于网路线上发表之文章即为预刊文章。预刊文章尚未有卷期、页次及出版日期资讯，但可藉由DOI号识别。 DOI号是文献的数位身份证字号，不论预刊或正式出版皆不会改变，读者可点击DOI连结，或于DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」连结到文献目前最新版本。

如何引用预刊文章？

请使用预刊文章的线上发表日期及DOI号来引用该篇文献。

引用范例(视不同引文格式规范可能有所差异)：

作者姓名。文章篇名。期刊名称。 YYYY/MM/DD线上预先发表。

doi:DOI 号

来源数据

P295 - 315

社会科学 > 管理学

DOI： 10.6504/JOM

书目管理工具

相关连结

问题回报

全文下载

参与科技专案厂商之组织学习、社会资本与技术移转之实证研究

Organizational Learning, Social Capital and Technology Transfer: An Empirical Study on Firms Participating R&D Consortia

方世杰(Shih-Chieh Fang) ；林丽娟(Julia L. Lin)

管理学报； 22 卷 3 期 (2005 / 06 / 01) ， P295 - 315

繁体中文 DOI： 10.6504/JOM.2005.22.03.02

科技专案；组织学习；社会资本；技术移转； Organizational learning ； Social capital ； Technology transfer ； R&D consortia

0 个人觉得这篇文章赞

摘要 │ 参考文献 (58) │ 被引用文献 (7) │ 国际计量

摘要〈TOP〉

并列摘要〈TOP〉

It is now widely recognized that, to survive and thrive in competitive environments, firms must keep upgrading their core technologies. In contrast to develop the core technology internally, acquiring the technology externally is a fast, low-risk and effective way. To sustain their competitive advantage, firms must seek cooperative relationships with other firms to acquire the critical technologies rather than only purchase the standardized technologies or patents from market. Transferring technology externally from joint ventures, strategic alliances, or R&D consortia, is particularly significant for the Taiwanese small-medium enterprises as they have been upgrading from OEM to ODM or even to OBM.
There has been a growing body of research focusing on technology transfer for decades. However, some fundamental questions of technology transfer require more attention. First, social capital is an important perspective in explaining the technology transfer and knowledge acquiring from R&D collaboration because of the tacitness and distinctness characteristics of technology and knowledge. Secondly, most prior studies have focused on the dyadic relationship between firm and research institution, but ignored the effects of position of an individual firm in the network. Although firms can facilitate the technology transfer by developing relationships with other partners in strategic R&D networks, firms must also have effective organizational learning to secure and exploit the technology they have acquired.
In other words, firms first can leverage interorganizational relationships to obtain the critical resource through network learning and then improve performance of technology transfer. In addition, firms have to construct effective organizational learning internally to internalize the acquired knowledge from external networks. In attempting to explore the process and performance of technology transfer in R&D consortia, we integrate the social capital and organizational learning issues to examine their effects on technology transfer while social capital refers to firms' external capability and organizational learning refers to firms' internal capability. Our research questions include: 1) How does firms' social capital with external partners in R&D consortium affect performance of technology transfer? 2) How does firms' internal capability of organizational learning affect performance of technology transfer? And 3) Are the effects of social capital and the organizational learning on the performance of technology transfer complementary?
Based on an empirical investigation on 110 firms participating ITRI-sponsored R&D consortia, we find: 1) Firms capabilities of organizational learning, including learning intent, absorptivity and knowledge integration capability, have positive effects on performance of technology transfer. 2) Among the concepts of social capital, only centrality has positive effects on market advantage of technology transfer, and number of linkage, relationship quality and shared norm within network have positive effects on technology advantage. 3) Some concepts of organizational learning and social capital have complementary effects on technology transfer performance. For examples, firms with central position in network and better relationship quality can facilitate the technology transfer performance if they also have stronger intent and aborptivity. In additions, firms with more linkage and stronger relationship have better technology advantage if their learning intent and aborptivity are stronger. 4) Firms with long-term interaction ITRI have better technology advantage of technology transfer and on the other hand, firms with social capital developed mainly from the interaction with other partners participating the same consortium, have better market performance.
Theoretically, we first conclude that firms, to sustain competitive advantage, must not only leverage the external interorganizational relationships, but also improve their organizational learning internally. Secondly, we argue social relationships can be capital and liability as well. Firms have to evaluate the appropriateness and effectiveness of constructing social capital as it is costly and oversociallized is inefficient. Lastly, the effects of external social capital and internal organizational learning on technology transfer are complementary rather than substitute.
We present some suggestions for practice. First, organizational learning capability is the fundamental issue of technology transfer While evaluating whether and how to develop social capital, firms have to improve their organizational learning by optimizing the resource allocations due to the availability of resources and some constraints. It takes long time for firms to construct social capital and the benefits are not immediate. Furthermore, it is beneficial for firms to keep long-term relationship with ITRI.
The first contribution of this study is combining the network perspective and organizational learning to understand the cooperation between firms and research institutions. It is an important issue for firms to leverage external relationships and strengthen internal organizational learning as well in this co-opetitive environment. Most prior studies have focused on the dyad relationship between firm and firm, or firm and research institution. We, adopting the network embeddeness perspective, explicate firms' strategic role in network and distinguish the relationships between ”firm and firm” and ”firm and research institution.”

参考文献 ( 58 ) 〈TOP〉

Adler, P. S.,Kwon Seok-Woo(2002).Social capital: prospects for a new concept.Academy of Management Review,27,17-40.
Ahuja, G.(2000).Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study.Administrative Science Quarterly,45,425-455.
Blyler, M.,Coff, R. W.(2003).Dynamic capabilities, social capital, and rent appropriation: Ties that spit pies.Strategic Management Journal,24(7),677-686.
Brown, J. S.,Duguid, P.(2001).Knowledge and Organization : A Social-Practice Perspective.Organization Science,12,198-213.
Burt, R. S.(1997).The contingent value of social capital.Administrative Science Quarterly,42,339-365.

被引用文献 ( 7 ) 〈TOP〉

国际计量

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

文章公开取用时，将寄通知信至您填写的信箱地址