臺灣大學社會責任研究現況與發展分析

Chih-Pin Hsing; Yung-Chih Huang

doi:10.6151/CERQ.202303_31(1).0001

山西大学，您好！

感谢采购，人社期刊库｜人社论文库，期间：2025/01/01~2025/12/31

感谢试用，科学期刊库｜科学论文库，期间：2024/10/20~2025/01/20

浏览高级检索

关闭
检索检索高级检索出版物检索
浏览期刊主题浏览核心期刊浏览期刊拼音浏览

关闭

查询符号(半角)	查询符号意义说明
空格	表示为「AND」两个查询词之交集
双引号 ( " " )	片语以双引号标示开始及结束，而且只寻找出现顺序相同的字词，例： " image process "
?	表示一个字母切截，输入两个?表两个字母，依此类推，例：输入「Appl?」，查得结果应为appl e , appl y … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
*	表示不限字母切截，由0~n. 例：输入「appl*」，查得结果应为appl e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
AND、OR、NOT	布尔逻辑组合关键字，用来扩大或缩小查询范围的技巧。 (1) AND ：缩小查询范围 (2) OR ：扩大查询范围(3) NOT：排除不相关的范围

DOI 是数位物件识别码（ D igital O bject I dentifier ）的简称，
为物件在网路上的唯一识别码，可用于永久连结并引用目标物件。

使用DOI作为永久连结

每个DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」便成为永久网址。
如以DOI号为 10.5297/ser.1201.002 的文献为例，此文献的永久连结便是： http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
日后不论出版单位如何更动此文献位置，永久连结所指向的位置皆会即时更新，不再错失重要的研究。

引用含有DOI的文献

有DOI的文献在引用时皆应同时引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未规范DOI的引用格式，可引用DOI永久连结。

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考（）。

ACI:

数据来源：Academic Citation Index，简称ACI

台湾最大的引用文献资料库，目前收录台湾与港澳地区所出版的人文学、社会学领域学术期刊之书目资料与参考文献，总期刊量超过690种，每年定期公布收录期刊的影响指数(Impact Factor)等指标给大众，并提供专家学者与学术单位实用的计量与分析功能。

五年影响指数（5-Year Impact Factor）：某一期刊前五年所出版的文章在当年度的平均被引用次数。

公式：（前五年发表论文在统计年的被引用次数）÷（前五年论文产出论文总篇数）

例如：A期刊2017年之五年影响指数

(A期刊2012-2016年发表论文在2017年的被引总次数)/(A期刊2012-2016年发表的论文总数)

什么是预刊文章？

为提供读者最前线之学术资讯，于期刊文献获同意刊登后、纸本印制完成前，率先于网路线上发表之文章即为预刊文章。预刊文章尚未有卷期、页次及出版日期资讯，但可藉由DOI号识别。 DOI号是文献的数位身份证字号，不论预刊或正式出版皆不会改变，读者可点击DOI连结，或于DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」连结到文献目前最新版本。

如何引用预刊文章？

请使用预刊文章的线上发表日期及DOI号来引用该篇文献。

引用范例(视不同引文格式规范可能有所差异)：

作者姓名。文章篇名。期刊名称。 YYYY/MM/DD线上预先发表。

doi:DOI 号

来源数据

P5 - 9+11-40

社会科学 > 教育学

DOI： 10.6151/CERQ

书目管理工具

相关连结

问题回报

全文下载

台湾大学社会责任研究现况与发展分析

A REVIEW OF THE STATUS AND DEVELOPMENT OF UNIVERSITY SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN TAIWAN

刑志彬(Chih-Pin Hsing) ；黄勇智(Yung-Chih Huang)

当代教育研究季刊； 31 卷 1 期 (2023 / 03 / 31) ， P5 - 9+11-40

繁体中文;英文 DOI： 10.6151/CERQ.202303_31(1).0001

大学社会责任；共词分析；社会网络分析；高等教育课程；区域发展； university social responsibility ； co-word analysis ； social network analysis ； higher education course ； regional development

0 个人觉得这篇文章赞

摘要 │ 参考文献 (43) │ 被引用文献 (1) │ 国际计量

摘要〈TOP〉

并列摘要〈TOP〉

Purpose: This study explored the current research related to university social responsibility in Taiwan and presented connections between local universities' social responsibility and various research topics. We outlined research profiles and development implications for Taiwanese universities' social responsibility. Design/methodology/approach: This study employed qualitative and quantitative research approaches. First, a co-word analysis was run on 75 academic publications on university social responsibility. Then, a hierarchical-cluster analysis was run on the keywords of each publication. In total, 14 subject categories were extracted. A social network analysis technique was then applied to determine associations. These associations were used to construct a graph on the context and interaction relationships between social responsibility research studies in Taiwanese universities. Findings/results: The research findings indicated that the research on university social responsibility at present is centered on "how universities as educational institutions are participating." The findings also showed that Taiwan’s universities have the highest integration rate with other issues, indicating that Taiwan is still in the early phases of policy implementation and that universities as educational institutions are still searching for mechanisms for cooperation. This includes integrating teaching work and interactive processes and assisting in the sustainable development of their fields of service to enhance domestic university social responsibility in Taiwan. On the other hand, research topics, such as talent education and the interaction between universities and communities, have been relatively neglected. This reflects the phenomenon that the research on university social responsibility in Taiwan is still focused on methodology and inquiry into the needs of localized areas; it has yet to condense into consensus issues that cross regions. This is due to the lack of research and the difficulty with promoting and implementing national policy, as there needs to be a balance between the developments of different regions within the country. Originality/value: The majority of the existing academic literature on university social responsibility in Taiwan has concentrated on conceptual initiatives and project execution reports, while empirical and constructive research outcomes are relatively scarce. This study employed a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods to construct a development framework on the knowledge of university social responsibility systematically. Analytical skills were employed to explain the phenomenological significance, providing an important reference point for advancements in domain knowledge. This study is one of few in this field to utilize academic literature as the analytical unit. Implications for policy/practice: This study outlined the developmental progress of the research on university social responsibility and found that research on "how universities as educational institutions can participate" tends to be authored by the faculty or staff of the university conducting the research. This may limit the direction and scope of research approaches, thereby potentially affecting the richness of the overall research community's development process. The government should consider incorporating the "service field side" as the subject of research to encourage speculation through the planning of related subsidies; subsidies may shift research focuses from "What have universities done, and what plans did they execute?" to "What can universities do together with the society and the community, and what collaborative plans can be executed?" This shift will better align with the spirit of university social responsibility. By achieving this, both sides can be attuned to the external environment in which the university is situated and be attuned to the university's responsibility for sustainable development.

参考文献 ( 43 ) 〈TOP〉

方瑀绅, Y. S.,李隆盛, L. S.(2014)。1994-2013 年国内外科技教育学位论文研究取向之比较。科技管理学刊，19(3)，33-61。
连结：
王思峰, S. F.,郑尹茹, Y. J.(2005)。线上与线下世界的交错：校园线上学习的社会网络分析。资讯社会研究，8，155-192。
连结：
刑志彬, C. P.,许育光, Y. K.(2020)。台湾运动心理学研究回顾：主题焦点与年代趋势之社会网络分析。中华心理学刊，62(2)，299-320。
连结：
李一圣, I. S.,郭姿伶, T. L.,周宏室, H. S.,潘义祥, Y. S.(2020)。大学生体育课个人与社会责任量表之建构与验证。大专体育学刊，22(3)，205-221。
连结：
李清福, C. F.,陈志铭, C. M.,曾元显, Y. H.(2013)。数位学习领域主题分析之研究。教育资料与图书馆学，50(3)，319-354。
连结：

被引用文献 ( 1 ) 〈TOP〉

(2023)。游戏治疗成因疗效：文献回顾的社会网络分析。谘商心理与复健谘商学报，38，79-96。

国际计量

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

文章公开取用时，将寄通知信至您填写的信箱地址