高雄地區青少年逃家經驗之調查研究

廖鳳池; 許雅惠; 翁令珍

doi:10.6308/JCG.09.03

山西大学，您好！

感谢采购，人社期刊库｜人社论文库，期间：2024/01/01~2024/12/31

感谢试用，科学期刊库｜科学论文库，期间：2024/10/20~2025/01/20

浏览高级检索

关闭
检索检索高级检索出版物检索
浏览期刊主题浏览核心期刊浏览期刊拼音浏览

关闭

查询符号(半角)	查询符号意义说明
空格	表示为「AND」两个查询词之交集
双引号 ( " " )	片语以双引号标示开始及结束，而且只寻找出现顺序相同的字词，例： " image process "
?	表示一个字母切截，输入两个?表两个字母，依此类推，例：输入「Appl?」，查得结果应为appl e , appl y … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
*	表示不限字母切截，由0~n. 例：输入「appl*」，查得结果应为appl e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
AND、OR、NOT	布尔逻辑组合关键字，用来扩大或缩小查询范围的技巧。 (1) AND ：缩小查询范围 (2) OR ：扩大查询范围(3) NOT：排除不相关的范围

DOI 是数位物件识别码（ D igital O bject I dentifier ）的简称，
为物件在网路上的唯一识别码，可用于永久连结并引用目标物件。

使用DOI作为永久连结

每个DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」便成为永久网址。
如以DOI号为 10.5297/ser.1201.002 的文献为例，此文献的永久连结便是： http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
日后不论出版单位如何更动此文献位置，永久连结所指向的位置皆会即时更新，不再错失重要的研究。

引用含有DOI的文献

有DOI的文献在引用时皆应同时引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未规范DOI的引用格式，可引用DOI永久连结。

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考（）。

ACI:

数据来源：Academic Citation Index，简称ACI

台湾最大的引用文献资料库，目前收录台湾与港澳地区所出版的人文学、社会学领域学术期刊之书目资料与参考文献，总期刊量超过690种，每年定期公布收录期刊的影响指数(Impact Factor)等指标给大众，并提供专家学者与学术单位实用的计量与分析功能。

五年影响指数（5-Year Impact Factor）：某一期刊前五年所出版的文章在当年度的平均被引用次数。

公式：（前五年发表论文在统计年的被引用次数）÷（前五年论文产出论文总篇数）

例如：A期刊2017年之五年影响指数

(A期刊2012-2016年发表论文在2017年的被引总次数)/(A期刊2012-2016年发表的论文总数)

什么是预刊文章？

为提供读者最前线之学术资讯，于期刊文献获同意刊登后、纸本印制完成前，率先于网路线上发表之文章即为预刊文章。预刊文章尚未有卷期、页次及出版日期资讯，但可藉由DOI号识别。 DOI号是文献的数位身份证字号，不论预刊或正式出版皆不会改变，读者可点击DOI连结，或于DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」连结到文献目前最新版本。

如何引用预刊文章？

请使用预刊文章的线上发表日期及DOI号来引用该篇文献。

引用范例(视不同引文格式规范可能有所差异)：

作者姓名。文章篇名。期刊名称。 YYYY/MM/DD线上预先发表。

doi:DOI 号

来源数据

P47 - 79

社会科学 > 心理学

DOI： 10.6308/JCG

书目管理工具

相关连结

问题回报

全文下载

高雄地区青少年逃家经验之调查研究

A Survey of the Runaway Experiences of Juveniles in Kaohsiung

廖凤池(Feng-Tsu Liao) ；许雅惠(Ya-Huei Hsu) ；翁令珍(Ling-Chen Weng)

谘商辅导学报：高师辅导所刊； 9 期 (2003 / 12 / 01) ， P47 - 79

繁体中文 DOI： 10.6308/JCG.09.03

青少年；逃家；虞犯行为；犯罪少年； juveniles ； running away from home/running away ； delinquency-prone behavior ； juvenile delinquents

0 个人觉得这篇文章赞

摘要 │ 参考文献 (8) │ 被引用文献 (4) │ 国际计量

摘要〈TOP〉

并列摘要〈TOP〉

Playing truant and running away from home are the most common delinquency-prone behaviors of juveniles. This study is to investigate the juvenile runaways’ family backgrounds, social resources, life experiences and runaway experiences, and to analyze the causes of the runaway behaviors, and then to propose the improvement of judicial treatment and guidance strategies. By using the self-edited Questionnaire of Juveniles’ Runaway Experiences, the researchers made a survey on the juvenile delinquents and the delinquency-prones pronounced by Kaohsiung juvenile Court from April to July in 2003, and also on the runaways not passed to court by sending questionnaires to the high schools in Kaohsiung County. Eventually, 390 effective samples were collected, which belonged to three groups for analysis and comparison: 92 pure juvenile runaways (not delinquents) included in the first group, 111 juvenile delinquents without runaway behaviors included in the second group, and 187 juvenile delinquents also with runaway behaviors included in the third group. The findings of this study were as follow: (1) The divorce rate of these juvenile runaways’ parents was much higher than that of general families. They were also caregived by their fathers more. The social and economic status of these families was obvious low, and about one-third of the families were poor. The juvenile runaways also had poor relationship and interaction with their family members. (2) A very high percentage (about 70% to 80%) of the juvenile runaways had good friends with runaway experiences. Also, where the runaways usually stayed was internet café, and they also had more companions in internet café or more friends made on internet. (3) Poor family interaction and inappropriate family discipline from their parents were the major causes of the juveniles’ running away. If the parents didn’t improve their ways of discipline, the juveniles were likely to run away again. (4) When the juveniles ran away for the first time, they ran into such problems as insufficient money to spend, staying too much time in internet café, living in unsafe places, or being confined by someone, and some of them might consequentially commit crimes such as theft and illegal jobs, etc., or even become the victims of others’ crimes. (5) Although the juveniles’ running away from home is generally regarded as a kind of delinquency-prone behavior, quite a lot of the juvenile runaways felt very free and happy after they ran away, and held very positive attitude towards their running away. The findings revealed that the juveniles’ running away shouldn’t be regarded merely as a kind of deviated behavior and that the poor interaction and the inappropriate parental discipline in their families shouldn’t be neglected. The researchers suggests that the judicial agencies, if to solve the problems of juvenile runaways, should aim at their family systems. The judicial agencies should detect more about the juvenile runaways’ family backgrounds and their parents’ attitude towards discipline so as to make adequate decisions on treatment. For example, they can request the parents to improve their ways of discipline and liaise with the schools and with the community guidance institutions to provide necessary individual or family counselling and parental education for the juveniles’ parents. If necessary, they also can exert compulsory parental education on them, or make a punishment of switching the parental rights to other party.

参考文献 ( 8 ) 〈TOP〉

Janus, M.D.,McComack A.,Burgess, A.W.,Carol Hartman(1987).Adolescent Runaways: Causes and Consequences.Lexington, Mass:Lexington Books.
Melson, B .K.(1995).Runaway Adolescents: A Family System Perspective.New York:Garland.
Whitbeck, L.B.,Hoyt, D.R.,Ackley, K.A.(1997).Families of Homeless and Runaway Adolescents: A Comparison of parent/Caretaker and Adolescent Perspectives on parenting, Family Violence, and Adolescent Conduct.Child Abuse & Neglect,21(6),517-528.
吴嫦娥、李祥媛(1995)。逃家少女交友经验之探讨－以台北市爲例。台北:台北市少年辅导委员会。
周震欧、赵碧华(1996)。青少年逃学逃家行爲的社会心理因素分析。犯罪学期刊，2，79-98。

被引用文献 ( 4 ) 〈TOP〉

董巧玲、李思贤(2013)。高中职夜校学生进出高风险场所之情形与其相关因素研究。中等教育，64(1)，44-63。
温福星、王郁琮(2012)。国中生学校学习与家庭关系困扰之群体异质性分析：以IRT Mixture Model。教育心理学报，44(1)，185-206。
吴中勤(2017)。以因素混合分析评估青少年偏差行为的异质性：自我控制理论的诠释。调查研究：方法与应用，37，155-194。
(2006)。非行少年之人格特质、父母管教态度与其逃家行为之相关研究。社区发展季刊，115，347-362。

国际计量

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

文章公开取用时，将寄通知信至您填写的信箱地址