青少年復原力量表之編制與驗證

沈家綺; 連倖誼

doi:10.6251/BEP.202209_54(1).0006

山西大学，您好！

感谢采购，人社期刊库｜人社论文库，期间：2024/01/01~2024/12/31

感谢试用，科学期刊库｜科学论文库，期间：2024/10/20~2025/01/20

浏览高级检索

关闭
检索检索高级检索出版物检索
浏览期刊主题浏览核心期刊浏览期刊拼音浏览

关闭

查询符号(半角)	查询符号意义说明
空格	表示为「AND」两个查询词之交集
双引号 ( " " )	片语以双引号标示开始及结束，而且只寻找出现顺序相同的字词，例： " image process "
?	表示一个字母切截，输入两个?表两个字母，依此类推，例：输入「Appl?」，查得结果应为appl e , appl y … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
*	表示不限字母切截，由0~n. 例：输入「appl*」，查得结果应为appl e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
AND、OR、NOT	布尔逻辑组合关键字，用来扩大或缩小查询范围的技巧。 (1) AND ：缩小查询范围 (2) OR ：扩大查询范围(3) NOT：排除不相关的范围

DOI 是数位物件识别码（ D igital O bject I dentifier ）的简称，
为物件在网路上的唯一识别码，可用于永久连结并引用目标物件。

使用DOI作为永久连结

每个DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」便成为永久网址。
如以DOI号为 10.5297/ser.1201.002 的文献为例，此文献的永久连结便是： http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
日后不论出版单位如何更动此文献位置，永久连结所指向的位置皆会即时更新，不再错失重要的研究。

引用含有DOI的文献

有DOI的文献在引用时皆应同时引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未规范DOI的引用格式，可引用DOI永久连结。

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考（）。

ACI:

数据来源：Academic Citation Index，简称ACI

台湾最大的引用文献资料库，目前收录台湾与港澳地区所出版的人文学、社会学领域学术期刊之书目资料与参考文献，总期刊量超过690种，每年定期公布收录期刊的影响指数(Impact Factor)等指标给大众，并提供专家学者与学术单位实用的计量与分析功能。

五年影响指数（5-Year Impact Factor）：某一期刊前五年所出版的文章在当年度的平均被引用次数。

公式：（前五年发表论文在统计年的被引用次数）÷（前五年论文产出论文总篇数）

例如：A期刊2017年之五年影响指数

(A期刊2012-2016年发表论文在2017年的被引总次数)/(A期刊2012-2016年发表的论文总数)

什么是预刊文章？

为提供读者最前线之学术资讯，于期刊文献获同意刊登后、纸本印制完成前，率先于网路线上发表之文章即为预刊文章。预刊文章尚未有卷期、页次及出版日期资讯，但可藉由DOI号识别。 DOI号是文献的数位身份证字号，不论预刊或正式出版皆不会改变，读者可点击DOI连结，或于DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」连结到文献目前最新版本。

如何引用预刊文章？

请使用预刊文章的线上发表日期及DOI号来引用该篇文献。

引用范例(视不同引文格式规范可能有所差异)：

作者姓名。文章篇名。期刊名称。 YYYY/MM/DD线上预先发表。

doi:DOI 号

来源数据

P131 - 153

社会科学 > 心理学
社会科学 > 教育学

DOI： 10.6251/BEP

书目管理工具

相关连结

问题回报

全文下载

青少年复原力量表之编制与验证

Development and Validation of an Adolescent Resilience Scale

沈家绮(Chia-Chi Shen) ；连幸谊(Hsin-Yi Lien)

教育心理学报； 54 卷 1 期 (2022 / 09 / 01) ， P131 - 153

繁体中文 DOI： 10.6251/BEP.202209_54(1).0006

青少年；复原力；性别； adolescent ； resilience ； gender

0 个人觉得这篇文章赞

摘要 │ 参考文献 (83) │ 国际计量

摘要〈TOP〉

并列摘要〈TOP〉

Psychological resilience can be defined as the capacity to cope with challenges. In adolescents, resilience involves response and protective factors they exercise when confronting difficulties. In the past two decades, resilience during adolescence has gained considerable research attention. However, most relevant studies in Taiwan have employed translated or revised non- Taiwanese scales with high reliability and validity to measure resilience among adolescents. Furthermore, few resilience scales targeting factors specific to junior high school students have been reported in Taiwan. The current study filled this gap by developing an adolescent resilience scale (ARS) and then verifying its reliability and validity. It also explored the adolescent resilience differences associated with individual variables such as age and gender. We employed the qualitative and quantitative methods and developed the ARS in the three phases: an open-ended questionnaire, a pilot test, and a formal test. All three phases were included to ensure the reliability and validity of not only the pilot but also the final version of the ARS. In the first phase, we applied convenience sampling to recruit 80 adolescents from two junior high schools in Northern Taiwan. After the exclusion of 18 questionnaires for incomplete data, we included 50 valid responses from 23 boys and 27 girls, with an 85% recovery rate. The questionnaire items included ＂What personality traits or abilities have helped you cope with difficulties?＂ ＂What strategies do you apply to solve problems, and why?＂ ＂What stops you from quitting learning when things get tough?＂ Next, we applied the inductive method to generate items from the obtained responses. Keywords and significant phrases related to adolescent resilience were summarized and generalized. They were then categorized into six factors: Show of Empathy (putting yourself in someone else's position and understanding the difficulty of others), Problem- Solving Competency (hard work, persistence, responsibility, and problem-solving), Self-Emotion Regulation (calmness and self-encouragement), Establishment of Life Goals (living up to expectations, planning for the future, and goal achievement), Competence Perception (independence, self-confidence, strength, ability to face challenges, and bravery), and Awareness of Positive Support (encouragement from friends and parents and help from teachers). We used the extracted keywords and phrases to draft a pilot ARS questionnaire, containing 53 items, rated on a 5-point Likert scale-with 1 indicating ＂completely disagree＂ and 5 indicating ＂completely agree＂; higher the score, the higher was the level of resilience. In the second phase, the pilot ARS questionnaire was distributed to 200 grade 8 and 9 students in a junior high school in Taiwan based on convenience sampling. Consequently, we obtained 145 valid samples from 52 grade 8 students and 93 grade 9 students (recovery rate = 83.8%; 69 boys and 76 girls). The data were analyzed using SPSS Amos (version 26; IBM). We performed item discrimination analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and reliability analysis to evaluate the internal consistency reliability and validity of the questionnaire. Item analysis was performed using corrected item-total correlation and the significance of the mean item difference of the top 27% and bottom 27% of the data was determined using a t test. Two items with a critical ratio of ＜ 3 and one item with item-total correlation of ＜ 0.4 were excluded to increase the overall Cronbach's α. Our EFA results confirmed the factor structure of the ARS. A high Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO; 0.922) indicated the suitability of the data for EFA, and a X^2 of 6173.745 (p ＜ 0.001) proved the factorability of the data. In the EFA, all 23 items were subjected to principal component analysis, and only the final six factors were able to explain 66.363% of the total variance. After repeated EFA, all 23 items (representing all six factors; KMO = 0.918, X^2 = 2227.545, p ＜ 0.001) could explain 74.489% of the total variance. The factor loadings ranged from 0.562 to 0.816, indicating that all items were good measures of their respective factors. All factors were internally consistent (α = 0.946) as well. In the third phase, we distributed 1,600 of the final questionnaire to grade 7-9 students from five junior high schools. We collected 1,513 valid responses from 546 grade 7, 419 grade 8, and 548 grade 9 students (recovery rate = 94.6%; 730 boys and 783 girls). The data were analyzed through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and cross-validation to verify the validity of the final version of the ARS. The data of the 1513 samples were randomly split in half. The first half (N = 756), considered an estimate sample, was subjected to CFA, whereas the second half (N = 757), considered a validity sample, was subjected to cross-validation. The CFA results for all items indicated that the model demonstrated a good fit [comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.95, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.05, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = 0.94, goodness of fit index (GFI) = 0.93] and was free from offending estimates. The internal consistency estimates in scale construction were satisfactory. The correlation analysis demonstrated a consistent pattern of relationships, suggesting convergent and discriminant validity. Next, to confirm the stability of the scale for different samples, the second half of the sample (N = 757) was analyzed through cross-validation. The results demonstrated a good data fit in the resilience model (X^2 = 726.844, p ＜ 0.001; CFI = 0.93, RMSEA = 0.05, TLI = 0.91, GFI = 0.92). As such, both CFA and EFA indicated that the 23-item ARS, with a 6-factor structure, has good construct validity for our single factor model. Significant age differences were observed in the overall ARS scores and scores on the Show of Empathy, Self-Emotion Regulation, and Establishment of Life Goals subscales. Specifically, the grade 7 students scored higher on the subscales than did the grade 8 and 9 students. Although no sex differences were found on the overall ARS score, the girls scored significantly higher on the Show of Empathy subscale, whereas the boys scored significantly higher in the Self-Emotion Regulation subscale. Moreover, the Show of Empathy subscale scores did not increase with age; nevertheless, it was the highest in the girls in grade 9 but the lowest in the boys in grade 8. The Self-Emotion Regulation subscale scores decreased with aged in the girls but not in the boys; moreover, the Self-Emotion Regulation scores were the highest in boys in the grade 7 boys but the lowest in the grade 9 girls. In conclusion, our results indicated that our 23-item 6-domain ARS is a reliable and valid instrument for the measurement of adolescent resilience and these subfactors: show of empathy, problem-solving competency, self-emotion regulation, establishment of life goals, competence perception, and positive support awareness. The ARS's psychometric properties, structural validity and internal consistency reliability, were explored. The results demonstrated that the ARS has great reliability and validity and thus is recommended for analyzing adolescent resilience. In the present study, we focused on the effects of individual traits related to resilience. Future studies including environmental factors, such as those related to peers, family, school, community, and society, which also influence adolescent resilience, are warranted. Moreover, these studies may involve individual personalities as inner protective factors and add external protective factors and risk factors for a more comprehensive understanding of adolescent resilience. Other future research directions include expanding the study scope to participants from different cultures, age groups, or socioeconomic backgrounds. Moreover, in future, we will expand on the current results by clarifying the effects of local Chinese cultures on adolescent resilience.

参考文献 ( 83 ) 〈TOP〉

王鸿裕, H.-Y.,江志正, C.-C.(2012)。台中市国民小学校长复原力之研究。教育理论与实践学刊，26，31-69。
连结：
吴相仪, H.-Y.,张圣翎, S.-L.,萧舒谦, S.-C.,简晋龙, C.-L.(2018)。感恩到幸福：从复原力探讨感恩与心理健康之关系。教育心理学报，50，83-106。
连结：
吴崇旗, C.-C.,谢智谋, C.-M.(2017)。冒险教育课程对受灾青少年复原力之成效研究。体育学报，50，451-468。
连结：
李旻苙, M.-L.,蔡欣玲, S.-L.(2021)。服役之适应障碍青年及一般服役青年於冲动控制、复原力与忧郁之间的差异研究。精神卫生护理杂志，16(1)，18-26。
连结：
张映芬, Y.-F.(2021)。国中生学习挫折复原历程模式之建构：心理资本、社会资本、挫折容忍力、正向情绪、适应性动机涉入之关系。教育心理学报，53，173-197。
连结：

国际计量

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

文章公开取用时，将寄通知信至您填写的信箱地址