復原力對國小學習障礙學生與一般學生在心理健康上的影響：個人與變項取向

張萬烽

doi:10.6251/BEP.202209_54(1).0003

山西大学，您好！

感谢采购，人社期刊库｜人社论文库，期间：2024/01/01~2024/12/31

感谢试用，科学期刊库｜科学论文库，期间：2024/10/20~2025/01/20

浏览高级检索

关闭
检索检索高级检索出版物检索
浏览期刊主题浏览核心期刊浏览期刊拼音浏览

关闭

查询符号(半角)	查询符号意义说明
空格	表示为「AND」两个查询词之交集
双引号 ( " " )	片语以双引号标示开始及结束，而且只寻找出现顺序相同的字词，例： " image process "
?	表示一个字母切截，输入两个?表两个字母，依此类推，例：输入「Appl?」，查得结果应为appl e , appl y … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
*	表示不限字母切截，由0~n. 例：输入「appl*」，查得结果应为appl e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
AND、OR、NOT	布尔逻辑组合关键字，用来扩大或缩小查询范围的技巧。 (1) AND ：缩小查询范围 (2) OR ：扩大查询范围(3) NOT：排除不相关的范围

DOI 是数位物件识别码（ D igital O bject I dentifier ）的简称，
为物件在网路上的唯一识别码，可用于永久连结并引用目标物件。

使用DOI作为永久连结

每个DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」便成为永久网址。
如以DOI号为 10.5297/ser.1201.002 的文献为例，此文献的永久连结便是： http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
日后不论出版单位如何更动此文献位置，永久连结所指向的位置皆会即时更新，不再错失重要的研究。

引用含有DOI的文献

有DOI的文献在引用时皆应同时引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未规范DOI的引用格式，可引用DOI永久连结。

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考（）。

ACI:

数据来源：Academic Citation Index，简称ACI

台湾最大的引用文献资料库，目前收录台湾与港澳地区所出版的人文学、社会学领域学术期刊之书目资料与参考文献，总期刊量超过690种，每年定期公布收录期刊的影响指数(Impact Factor)等指标给大众，并提供专家学者与学术单位实用的计量与分析功能。

五年影响指数（5-Year Impact Factor）：某一期刊前五年所出版的文章在当年度的平均被引用次数。

公式：（前五年发表论文在统计年的被引用次数）÷（前五年论文产出论文总篇数）

例如：A期刊2017年之五年影响指数

(A期刊2012-2016年发表论文在2017年的被引总次数)/(A期刊2012-2016年发表的论文总数)

什么是预刊文章？

为提供读者最前线之学术资讯，于期刊文献获同意刊登后、纸本印制完成前，率先于网路线上发表之文章即为预刊文章。预刊文章尚未有卷期、页次及出版日期资讯，但可藉由DOI号识别。 DOI号是文献的数位身份证字号，不论预刊或正式出版皆不会改变，读者可点击DOI连结，或于DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」连结到文献目前最新版本。

如何引用预刊文章？

请使用预刊文章的线上发表日期及DOI号来引用该篇文献。

引用范例(视不同引文格式规范可能有所差异)：

作者姓名。文章篇名。期刊名称。 YYYY/MM/DD线上预先发表。

doi:DOI 号

来源数据

P57 - 84

社会科学 > 心理学
社会科学 > 教育学

DOI： 10.6251/BEP

书目管理工具

相关连结

问题回报

全文下载

复原力对国小学习障碍学生与一般学生在心理健康上的影响：个人与变项取向

Resilience Among Students of Elementary School With and Without Learning Disabilities: Person-and Variable-Focused Approaches

张万烽(Wan-Feng Chang)

教育心理学报； 54 卷 1 期 (2022 / 09 / 01) ， P57 - 84

繁体中文 DOI： 10.6251/BEP.202209_54(1).0003

心理健康；危险因子；保护因子；复原力；学习障碍； mental health ； risk factor ； protective factor ； resilience ； learning disabilities

0 个人觉得这篇文章赞

摘要 │ 参考文献 (79) │ 被引用文献 (4) │ 国际计量

摘要〈TOP〉

并列摘要〈TOP〉

Students with learning disabilities (LD) have difficulty with their basic learning abilities, such as listening, speaking, reading, writing, and calculating, because of problems in their neuropsychological functions. LD also has negative effects on an individual's learning process and social emotions. The self-efficacy and motivation of students with LD are lower than those of students without LD. Studies have reported that students with LD have poor mental health. The presence of an LD is a risk factor for mental health concerns, and the identification of mental health risks and protective factors for individuals with LD is necessary to design effective intervention models. Most previous relevant studies have recruited students without LD, and only a few have recruited those with LD. A few studies have employed multiple methods that combine person-focused strategies with variable-focused strategies because they offer complementary methodological strengths. Person-focused models can be used to identify resilient people and understand how resilience develops by comparing the resilient with those who are not, namely those who are not faring well in adverse situations and have not experienced any threats to their development. A variable-focused approach focuses on the relationship between the indices of stress or adversity and the influencing factors of resilience and psychosocial functions. In summary, person-focused methods recognize the functions of a person as a living system, whereas variable-focused methods can be used to delve deeper into specific processes. The present study attempted to use these two approaches to attain a more comprehensive understanding of resilience among students with LD. In previous studies, students with LD were not considered the reference group; thus, we lack evidence on whether the resilience of students with LD differs from that of students with LD. Finally, this study explored the resilience mechanism of students with LD and can be used as a reference to determine how to provide support and assistance to students with poor mental health. The study group of this research was composed of students with and without LD who were in grades 3 to 5 at elementary schools in Kaohsiung City. They were selected during the second semester of 2017 using the stratified purposeful sampling method. With parents' permission, 802 students participated in this study, including 275 third graders, 269 fourth graders, and 258 fifth graders from 13 elementary schools. A total of 375 students had LD, including 113 third graders, 132 fourth graders, and 129 fifth graders from the resource classes in 55 elementary schools. Given the reading ability of students with LD, reducing the length of the questionnaire was necessary so that they could complete the survey. The study instruments included protective factors, mental health questionnaires, and academic achievement tests. The questionnaire on protective factors and mental health included five internal protective factors (i.e., physical self-concept, emotional self-concept, mathematics self-concept, Chinese self-concept, and self-efficacy) and three external protective factors (i.e., teacher support, peer support, and parental support), as well as mental health. The items in the questionnaire were scored from 4 (strongly agree) to 1 (strongly disagree), with higher scores indicating greater levels of performance. The academic achievement test included their achievements in Chinese and mathematics. These two instruments have demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity. For the person-focused approach, students with LD were classified into four groups through cluster analysis on the basis of the indices of both their mental health and academic achievement. A two-step method was applied to cluster the students. The protective factors in the different clusters of students with LD were compared. Furthermore, this study compared the protective factors in different clusters to determine whether there were significant differences between students with and without LD. For the variable-focused approach, the direct and the indirect modes were used to examine which protective factors could be used to predict the mental health of students with and without LD. A path analysis was used to test the direct and indirect model between the protective factors and mental health. In the direct model, the researcher assumes that each protective factor is positively correlated with mental health whereas the risk factors (mathematics and Chinese achievement) are negatively correlated. The indirect model was used to examine the hypothesis that self-efficacy acts as a mediator in the relationship of social support and self-concept with mental health. The main hypothesis of the variable-focused approach was tested using an application for structural equation modeling and by employing AMOS 22. Through the person-focused approach, the results obtained for the variables for students without LD were significantly higher than those for students with LD. In particular, the differences in their mental health and self-efficacy were large effect size, whereas the differences in their Chinese and mathematics achievements were more significant. After grouping the students through cluster analysis, four subgroups of students with LD were formed based on the following indicators: those high on mental health and high on academic achievement (positively adjusted, 29.26%); those high on mental health and low on academic achievement (resilient, 32.67%); those low on mental health and high on academic achievement (maladaptive, 10.80%); and those low on mental health and low on academic achievement (vulnerable, 27.27%). Students without LD were also divided into the same four groups (positively adjusted, 30.88%; resilient, 29.33%; maladaptive, 10.80%; and vulnerable, 11.24%). Regardless of whether the students had LD or not, no significant differences were observed in any protective factors for the two groups of students who were resilient and positively adjusted; however, a significant difference in academic achievement was observed. Between the two subgroups with similar low academic achievements, no significant differences in protective factors were noted. The present study discovered that students with LD and resilience had poor academic achievement but good mental health and the protective factors played a key role; among the two subgroups of students with LD with similar academic achievements, the protective factors for those at high risk were also higher. The academic achievement of the subgroup of resilient students with LD was poor, but the students exhibited better psychological adaptation than those who were maladaptive, mainly because of the protective factors. Among the two subgroups of students with LD who had similar academic achievements, the protective factors of the highly vulnerable students were lower than those of the competent students. In this study, the proportion of resilient and competent students with LD was approximately 50%. The proportion of students without LD in the resilient and competent subgroups was similar to that of students with LD. The results suggest that the protective factors are important to the mental health of both students with and without LD. Academic and cognitive difficulties do not necessarily have negative effects on the mental health of all students with LD. Declining mental health can be prevented or slowed by using protective factors, which enable students with LD to achieve different adaptation results. In the results of direct model in students without LD, emotional self-concept, Chinese self-concept, self-efficacy, and peer support predicted their mental health; by contrast, in students with LD, emotional self-concept, self-efficacy, and peer support, as well as parental support, were positively correlated with mental health. In the indirect model of students without LD, self-efficacy served as a mediator between emotional self-concept and parental support for mental health, whereas for students with LD, self-efficacy partially mediated the relationship between parental support and mental health. The results of the direct model indicated that mental health was significantly associated with protective factors. Therefore, regardless of whether the students had LD or not, protective factors enhanced the mental health of individuals, although the key factors differed between the two groups. In the indirect model, the study results revealed the mediating effect of self-efficacy among students without LD on their mental health parameters, including physical self-concept, emotion self-concept, Chinese self-concept, parental support, and peer support. These parameters directly influence the individuals' mental health and are associated with mental health through self-efficacy. Among students with LD, emotional self-concept and peer support had a direct positive correlation with their mental health, whereas parental support enhanced their mental health by bolstering their self-efficacy and, in turn, improving their mental health. Additionally, the physical and Chinese self-concepts only had a direct positive correlation with self-efficacy. Thus, the self-efficacy of the students with LD is crucial for their mental health. The results indicated that the protective factors of students with LD, such as social support and self-concepts, can enhance mental health. Finally, based on the results, this study proposes suggestions for future research and practice.

参考文献 ( 79 ) 〈TOP〉

吴秉叡, P.-R.,余民宁, M.-N.,辛怡葳, Y.-W.(2014)。正向事件解释风格、提升式希望感与复原力之模式验证：以学习障碍学生为例。特殊教育学报，40，1-34。
连结：
吴相仪, H.-Y., ,张圣翎, S.-L., ,萧舒谦, S.-C.,简晋龙, C.-L.(2018)。感恩到幸福：从复原力探讨感恩与心理健康之关系。教育心理学报 Bulletin of Educational Psychology，50，83-106。
连结：
张万烽, W.-F.(2020)。保护因子对於不同复原力类型学习障碍学生之影响。特殊教育研究学刊，45，65-96。
连结：
张万烽, W.-F.,吴裕益, Y.-Y.(2012)。学习障碍学生在国中基测数学科上表现与试题差异功能分析。特殊教育与复健学报，26，45-70。
连结：
陈思亲, S.-C.,陈慧娟, H.-J.(2021)。青少年知觉的社会支持和英文科学业成就之关系：恒毅力与学习投入之序列中介效果分析。教育心理学报，52，857-883。
连结：

被引用文献 ( 4 ) 〈TOP〉

张万烽(2023)。国小学习障碍学生与一般学生自我效能、家长支持以及心理健康之纵贯研究。教育心理学报，55(1)，125-151。
(2024).Effects of Academic Achievement and Academic Self-Concept on the Self-Efficacy and Mental Health of Students with Learning Disabilities.教育心理学报,56(1),101-125.
(2024)。高中职身障生校园受凌之研究──与普通生做比较。教育心理学报，56(1)，127-158。
(2024)。思觉失调症患者家属陪伴患者回归社区其生命经验之叙事研究。教育心理学报，55(3)，459-490。

国际计量

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

文章公开取用时，将寄通知信至您填写的信箱地址