大專校院聽覺障礙學生在不同遠距模式下的學習效果及影響因素之探討

Chun-Yu Yeh; Chu-Hsiu Teng

doi:10.6172/BSE.202411_49(3).0003

山西大学，您好！

感谢采购，人社期刊库｜人社论文库，期间：2025/01/01~2025/12/31

感谢试用，科学期刊库｜科学论文库，期间：2025/04/01~2025/06/30

浏览高级检索

关闭
检索检索高级检索出版物检索
浏览期刊主题浏览核心期刊浏览期刊拼音浏览

关闭

查询符号(半角)	查询符号意义说明
空格	表示为「AND」两个查询词之交集
双引号 ( " " )	片语以双引号标示开始及结束，而且只寻找出现顺序相同的字词，例： " image process "
?	表示一个字母切截，输入两个?表两个字母，依此类推，例：输入「Appl?」，查得结果应为appl e , appl y … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
*	表示不限字母切截，由0~n. 例：输入「appl*」，查得结果应为appl e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
AND、OR、NOT	布尔逻辑组合关键字，用来扩大或缩小查询范围的技巧。 (1) AND ：缩小查询范围 (2) OR ：扩大查询范围(3) NOT：排除不相关的范围

DOI 是数位物件识别码（ D igital O bject I dentifier ）的简称，
为物件在网路上的唯一识别码，可用于永久连结并引用目标物件。

使用DOI作为永久连结

每个DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」便成为永久网址。
如以DOI号为 10.5297/ser.1201.002 的文献为例，此文献的永久连结便是： http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
日后不论出版单位如何更动此文献位置，永久连结所指向的位置皆会即时更新，不再错失重要的研究。

引用含有DOI的文献

有DOI的文献在引用时皆应同时引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未规范DOI的引用格式，可引用DOI永久连结。

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考（）。

ACI:

数据来源：Academic Citation Index，简称ACI

台湾最大的引用文献资料库，目前收录台湾与港澳地区所出版的人文学、社会学领域学术期刊之书目资料与参考文献，总期刊量超过690种，每年定期公布收录期刊的影响指数(Impact Factor)等指标给大众，并提供专家学者与学术单位实用的计量与分析功能。

五年影响指数（5-Year Impact Factor）：某一期刊前五年所出版的文章在当年度的平均被引用次数。

公式：（前五年发表论文在统计年的被引用次数）÷（前五年论文产出论文总篇数）

例如：A期刊2017年之五年影响指数

(A期刊2012-2016年发表论文在2017年的被引总次数)/(A期刊2012-2016年发表的论文总数)

什么是预刊文章？

为提供读者最前线之学术资讯，于期刊文献获同意刊登后、纸本印制完成前，率先于网路线上发表之文章即为预刊文章。预刊文章尚未有卷期、页次及出版日期资讯，但可藉由DOI号识别。 DOI号是文献的数位身份证字号，不论预刊或正式出版皆不会改变，读者可点击DOI连结，或于DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」连结到文献目前最新版本。

如何引用预刊文章？

请使用预刊文章的线上发表日期及DOI号来引用该篇文献。

引用范例(视不同引文格式规范可能有所差异)：

作者姓名。文章篇名。期刊名称。 YYYY/MM/DD线上预先发表。

doi:DOI 号

来源数据

P69 - 102

社会科学 > 教育学

DOI： 10.6172/BSE

书目管理工具

相关连结

问题回报

全文下载

大专校院听觉障碍学生在不同远距模式下的学习效果及影响因素之探讨

Factors Influencing Distance Learning Effectiveness among College Students with Hearing Impairment

叶淳妤(Chun-Yu Yeh) ；邓菊秀(Chu-Hsiu Teng)

特殊教育研究学刊； 49 卷 3 期 (2024 / 11 / 30) ， P69 - 102

繁体中文;英文 DOI： 10.6172/BSE.202411_49(3).0003

同步远距；非同步远距；远距学习；调频辅具；听觉障碍； asynchronous distance ； distance learning ； frequency modulation device ； hearing impairment ； synchronous distance

0 个人觉得这篇文章赞

摘要 │ 参考文献 (68)

摘要〈TOP〉

并列摘要〈TOP〉

Rationale and Purpose: Under the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the education system underwent a global shift toward distance learning modes, posing an entirely new set of challenges for students with special educational needs. According to UNESCO data, more than 1.5 billion students globally were affected by this transition. Within this group, university students with hearing impairment have had to adapt to new learning environments while managing their specific auditory needs. Research has indicated that students with hearing impairment face several challenges during distance learning, including course content delivery, technical application, teaching methods, assessment tools, and social interaction. Distance learning can offer substantial benefits, such as reduced environmental noise, a flexible learning pace, and enhancement of technological proficiency and adaptive skills. However, maintaining consistent audio quality and ensuring effective communication and social interaction remain challenging. Naylor et al. (2020) identified higher oral communication anxiety among individuals with hearing loss during the pandemic, particularly when seeking audiological services. The present study (1) examined the differences in distance learning effectiveness between synchronous and asynchronous modes of instruction for university students with hearing impairment, (2) analyzed the relationship between frequency modulation device usage and learning effectiveness in distance learning environments, (3) investigated the effect of personal factors (gender, hearing assistive device type, and platform usage time) on learning effectiveness in synchronous and asynchronous distance learning environments for university students with hearing impairment, and (4) compared distance learning effectiveness between students with and without hearing impairment. Methods: The study used an online questionnaire survey to collect data from 153 university students (86 with hearing impairment and 67 without) in central Taiwan. The sample included students from Miaoli County, Taichung City, Changhua County, Nantou County, and Yunlin County. A 5-point Likert scale was used to rate questionnaire items in the following sections: personal background, frequency modulation device usage, synchronous distance learning experience, asynchronous distance learning experience, and overall distance learning satisfaction. The study achieved a response rate of 100% for students with hearing impairment recruited through purposive sampling while completing the survey online. The questionnaire's validity was established through expert review and pilot testing, ensuring key aspects of distance learning experiences were comprehensively addressed. SPSS 27.0 was used to derive descriptive statistics and perform a correlation analysis, t-tests, and an analysis of variance to examine the relationships between variables and determine group differences. The Bonferroni correction was applied to maintain statistical rigor in multiple comparisons. Results/Findings: The study revealed several key findings regarding distance learning effectiveness. In total, 86% of students with hearing impairment participated in both synchronous and asynchronous learning, and a high positive correlation was observed between satisfaction levels for both modes, suggesting that positive experiences in one mode facilitated adaptation to the other. The participants highly valued the immediate teacher feedback and interaction opportunities available during synchronous learning, although technical problems such as unstable internet connections and platform dysfunction posed challenges. The asynchronous mode was advantageous in reducing environmental interference and allowing a flexible learning pace, which was particularly beneficial for students experiencing poor network connectivity or environmental noise. Only 35% of students with hearing impairment had experience with frequency modulation devices, with usage rates slightly decreasing from 54.7% in face-to-face classes to 51.3% during distance learning. Among frequency modulation device users, 36.7% reported increased usage during distance learning, whereas another 36.7% reported decreased usage, reflecting individual differences in adaptation to the online environment. A significant negative correlation was found between environmental noise level and frequency modulation device usage, indicating reduced reliance on these devices in quieter environments. This finding is consistent with the observation of Chisolm et al. (2007) that frequency modulation devices are primarily useful in overcoming environmental reverberation and noise. The present study found no significant relationships between learning effectiveness and gender, hearing device type (hearing aid/cochlear implant), or daily platform usage time (0-3, 3-6, >6 hours). This finding is consistent with those of Wu (2013), Astleitner and Steinberg (2005), Ekawati et al. (2017), and Anyanwu and Onwubiko (2024) regarding gender effects but are inconsistent with the results of other studies. Although a potential relationship between platform usage time and learning effectiveness was observed for asynchronous learning, this relationship did not reach statistical significance after the Bonferroni correction. Comparative analysis between students with and without hearing impairment indicated that those with normal hearing exhibited significantly higher learning satisfaction with learning content during synchronous instruction only, but no significant differences were observed in other aspects. However, students with hearing impairment reported higher overall satisfaction with distance learning, particularly in teacher–student interaction and peer communication, compared with face-to-face classes. In contrast to students with hearing impairment, those with normal hearing had lower satisfaction with classroom interaction during distance learning; they believed that greater self-discipline was required to stay focused. This finding suggests that distance learning environments might more effectively accommodate the specific needs of students with hearing impairment than do face-to-face classrooms. However, Alqraini and Alasim (2021) reported that teachers found monitoring individual learning progress more difficult during distance learning, indicating a need for enhanced adaptive support mechanisms for students with hearing impairment. The present study also identified key factors affecting distance learning effectiveness, including network stability, platform functionality, environmental noise, and the clarity of instructional delivery. Initial findings suggested a positive correlation between unclear audio signals during distance learning and frequency modulation device usage, although this relationship became nonsignificant after Bonferroni correction, possibly owing to the limited sample size. Notably, in contrast to expectations, environmental noise levels exhibited no significant correlation with frequency modulation device usage preferences. Conclusions/Implications: The findings indicate that university students with hearing impairment generally preferred synchronous distance learning over traditional face-to-face instruction, despite its technical challenges. This study proposes the following strategies to enhance learning effectiveness, especially in synchronous settings: (1) encouraging the combined use of personal hearing devices and frequency modulation devices to minimize interference from environmental noise, (2) ensuring a quiet learning environment to facilitate speech clarity, (3) providing captions or sign language interpretation to enhance comprehension of course content, (4) maintaining clear camera views of instructors' facial expressions and lip movements, (5) distributing course materials in advance, and (6) recording synchronous sessions for review purposes. As distance learning becomes more prevalent with technological advancement, the abundance of online educational resources creates additional opportunities for independent learning. Future research should incorporate larger samples covering different school levels and focus on developing inclusive educational environments that address potential distance learning gaps for students with hearing impairment. Educational institutions should pay particular attention to potential learning disparities in distance education, especially problems regarding the comprehension of course content among students with hearing impairment, and provide adaptive learning support to create an inclusive learning environment. The findings of this study contribute to the growing body of knowledge about accessible distance education and provide practical implications for educational institutions in supporting students with hearing impairment in online learning environments.

参考文献 ( 68 ) 〈TOP〉

宋鸿燕, H.-Y.(2022)。全英语授课通识课程融入混成学习对学生学习成效之影响及性别差异。通识学刊：理念与实务，10(2)，119-153+155。
连结：
杜瑞泽, J.-C.,邱淑萍, S.-P.,庄立文, L.-W.,朱维政, W.-C.(2013)。远距教学之线上学习成效影响因子之研究。文化创意产业研究学报，3(4)，157-166。
连结：
岳修平, H.-P.(2000)。即时群播远距教学之班级经营。课程与教学季刊，3(2)，63-74+154。
连结：
张琼穗, C.-S.,陈宜欣, Y.-H.(2003)。大学同步远距课程互动问题之探讨：以淡江大学为例。教育资料与图书馆学，40(4)，525-533。
连结：
陈昭珍, C.-C.,徐芝君, C.-C.,洪嘉馡, J.-F.,胡衍南, Y.-N.(2021)。COVID-19 下台师大的远距教学经验与省思。当代教育研究季刊，29(1)，1-23。
连结：

E-mail ：

文章公开取用时，将寄通知信至您填写的信箱地址