結合反思平臺之數位敘事教學對研究生反思表現、數位敘事自我效能及小組數位敘事表現之影響

Hsiu-Ling Chen; Tzu-Yu Pan

doi:10.6209/JORIES.202403_69(1).0001

山西大学，您好！

感谢采购，人社期刊库｜人社论文库，期间：2025/01/01~2025/12/31

感谢试用，科学期刊库｜科学论文库，期间：2025/04/01~2025/06/30

浏览高级检索

关闭
检索检索高级检索出版物检索
浏览期刊主题浏览核心期刊浏览期刊拼音浏览

关闭

查询符号(半角)	查询符号意义说明
空格	表示为「AND」两个查询词之交集
双引号 ( " " )	片语以双引号标示开始及结束，而且只寻找出现顺序相同的字词，例： " image process "
?	表示一个字母切截，输入两个?表两个字母，依此类推，例：输入「Appl?」，查得结果应为appl e , appl y … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
*	表示不限字母切截，由0~n. 例：输入「appl*」，查得结果应为appl e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
AND、OR、NOT	布尔逻辑组合关键字，用来扩大或缩小查询范围的技巧。 (1) AND ：缩小查询范围 (2) OR ：扩大查询范围(3) NOT：排除不相关的范围

DOI 是数位物件识别码（ D igital O bject I dentifier ）的简称，
为物件在网路上的唯一识别码，可用于永久连结并引用目标物件。

使用DOI作为永久连结

每个DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」便成为永久网址。
如以DOI号为 10.5297/ser.1201.002 的文献为例，此文献的永久连结便是： http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
日后不论出版单位如何更动此文献位置，永久连结所指向的位置皆会即时更新，不再错失重要的研究。

引用含有DOI的文献

有DOI的文献在引用时皆应同时引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未规范DOI的引用格式，可引用DOI永久连结。

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考（）。

ACI:

数据来源：Academic Citation Index，简称ACI

台湾最大的引用文献资料库，目前收录台湾与港澳地区所出版的人文学、社会学领域学术期刊之书目资料与参考文献，总期刊量超过690种，每年定期公布收录期刊的影响指数(Impact Factor)等指标给大众，并提供专家学者与学术单位实用的计量与分析功能。

五年影响指数（5-Year Impact Factor）：某一期刊前五年所出版的文章在当年度的平均被引用次数。

公式：（前五年发表论文在统计年的被引用次数）÷（前五年论文产出论文总篇数）

例如：A期刊2017年之五年影响指数

(A期刊2012-2016年发表论文在2017年的被引总次数)/(A期刊2012-2016年发表的论文总数)

什么是预刊文章？

为提供读者最前线之学术资讯，于期刊文献获同意刊登后、纸本印制完成前，率先于网路线上发表之文章即为预刊文章。预刊文章尚未有卷期、页次及出版日期资讯，但可藉由DOI号识别。 DOI号是文献的数位身份证字号，不论预刊或正式出版皆不会改变，读者可点击DOI连结，或于DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」连结到文献目前最新版本。

如何引用预刊文章？

请使用预刊文章的线上发表日期及DOI号来引用该篇文献。

引用范例(视不同引文格式规范可能有所差异)：

作者姓名。文章篇名。期刊名称。 YYYY/MM/DD线上预先发表。

doi:DOI 号

来源数据

P1 - 33

社会科学 > 教育学

DOI： 10.6209/JORIES

书目管理工具

相关连结

问题回报

全文下载

结合反思平台之数位叙事教学对研究生反思表现、数位叙事自我效能及小组数位叙事表现之影响

The Effects of Digital Storytelling With the Reflective Platform on Graduate Students' Reflective Thinking, Digital Storytelling Self-efficacy, and Collaborative Digital Storytelling Performance

陈秀玲(Hsiu-Ling Chen) ；潘姿佑(Tzu-Yu Pan)

教育科学研究期刊； 69 卷 1 期 (2024 / 03 / 01) ， P1 - 33

繁体中文;英文 DOI： 10.6209/JORIES.202403_69(1).0001

反思表现；数位叙事自我效能；数位叙事表现； reflective thinking ； digital storytelling self-efficacy ； digital storytelling performance

0 个人觉得这篇文章赞

摘要 │ 参考文献 (86) │ 国际计量

摘要〈TOP〉

并列摘要〈TOP〉

Introduction: Scholars have indicated that the most effective learning occurs when students engage in self-monitoring or reflection. This process enables learners to gain a deeper understanding of their acquired knowledge, which enhances their overall learning performance. Consequently, promoting students' ability to reflect has become a focal point in the field of education. In recent years, digital storytelling has garnered considerable attention from researchers as an innovative and effective teaching tool. Traditional, teacher-centered, lecture-based learning often involves memorizing and reciting, making it challenging for students to develop high-level thinking. By contrast, digital storytelling involves a learner-centered approach, enabling students to integrate learned concepts with their personal experiences through storytelling. This method empowers students to organize and reinterpret the knowledge that they have acquired. The integration of information technology enables students to more comprehensively share their acquired knowledge with each other and enhances the development of deep learning and high-level cognitive abilities. Although digital storytelling offers numerous benefits to teachers, the varying quality of digital stories created by students remains a notable challenge. Consequently, this study employed the reflective learning model proposed by McDrury and Alterio (2003) as an instructional scaffold to design a digital storytelling reflection platform. The platform effectively guides students through the process of creating and reflecting on digital stories, ultimately improving the overall quality of their narratives. Literature Review: Digital storytelling closely resembles traditional storytelling; both emphasize developing thematic narratives from a specific perspective. The key difference between the two is that digital storytelling incorporates multimedia elements, such as pictures, text, voiceovers, videos, animation, and music. In addition, computer editing is used to enhance the presentation of information. Digital storytelling involves seven key elements: point of view, dramatic question, emotional content, the gift of voice, the power of the soundtrack, economy, and pacing. Studies have demonstrated that digital storytelling not only boosts students' motivation and interest but also encourages them to express their ideas and engage in collaborative thinking. Additionally, creating digital stories helps students understand complex and abstract concepts and organize their knowledge in a personalized and meaningful manner. Moreover, collaborative small-group work stimulates student interest, and through the process of publishing and sharing, collaborative storytelling promotes peer interaction, communication and expression, problem-solving, and reflection. McDrury and Alterio's (2003) reflective learning model comprises the following stages: story finding, storytelling, story expanding, digital story editing, and story reconstructing. The model focuses on storytelling as a framework for promoting reflective learning, with students being encouraged to express their ideas through narratives. Engaging in peer collaboration during this process enables students to share and discuss their viewpoints and experiences, which leads to further reflection on the stories and reconstruction of meaning. Method: A total of 28 graduate students (6 men and 22 women) participated in this study. The students were randomly divided into eight groups. A one-group pretest-posttest design was adopted within the quasi-experimental research in which digital storytelling was integrated with a reflection platform for experimental teaching. To investigate whether this curriculum design enhanced participants' reflection skills, digital storytelling self-efficacy, and collaborative digital storytelling performance, the study analyzed differences in the participants' scores on the Questionnaire for Reflective Thinking and Digital Storytelling Self-Efficacy Scale before and after the experimental teaching. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the course was evaluated by grading each group's presentation by using the Digital Storytelling Assessment. In addition to quantitative data, qualitative information, such as peer feedback and interviews with the participants through the digital storytelling reflection platform, was obtained, with these data serving as a supplementary reference for assessing the effects of the experiments. Result: The preclass and postclass questionnaire results regarding reflection skills and digital storytelling self-efficacy revealed that the integration of digital storytelling with the reflection platform enhanced the graduate students' reflection skills (deepened their thinking) and digital storytelling self-efficacy. Additionally, the participants' collaborative digital storytelling efforts yielded favorable performance outcomes. Qualitative interviews revealed that most students attributed their enhanced reflection skills to peer feedback and collaboration. Positive feedback from peers serves as encouragement and affirmation for students, boosting students' confidence in creating digital stories. In the current study, when provided with suggestions from peers, most of the students chose to apply those presented as constructive feedback or those that were frequently mentioned. Additionally, the students expressed that because they did not receive face-to-face feedback, they did not feel stressed about receiving the feedback, which in turn made them more willing to share their thoughts with others. During the process of collaborative digital story creation, the participants benefitted from being presented with various ideas from their peers, brainstorming with each other, exploring multiple perspectives, and reflecting on their own stories. However, some participants mentioned that they experienced little improvement in their reflective thinking because of their individual habits and traits. Discussion and Suggestions: Although the results of this study indicate that the curriculum design improved the participants' reflection skills, digital storytelling self-efficacy, and collaborative digital storytelling performance, this study has the limitation of having simultaneously implemented different interventions. The simultaneous use of a reflection platform, story scaffolding, peer feedback, and teamwork increases the difficulty of determining which specific teaching intervention had the most notable impact on the graduate students' reflection skills, digital storytelling self-efficacy, and collaborative digital storytelling performance. Future research may consider independently investigating individual teaching interventions, such as digital storytelling teaching combined with a reflection platform, digital storytelling with or without peer feedback, or digital storytelling with or without teamwork. By differentiating experimental and control groups more precisely, future studies can investigate the specific impact of digital storytelling, peer feedback, and group collaboration on reflection skills.

参考文献 ( 86 ) 〈TOP〉

陈淑敏, A. S.-M.,林智凯, C.-K.(2022)。大学生叙事力的学习表现与反思之研究：以移工议题的实作为途径。通识教育学刊，29，11-39。
连结：
潘慧玲, H.-L.,洪秋玮, C.-W.(2020)。标准本位政策脉络下师资培育改革成效之评估：应用「行动模式／改变模式图式」分析师资培育学程。教育科学研究期刊，65(2)，73-104。
连结：
锺世润, S.-J.,黄博圣, P.-S.(2022)。以面对面、Moodle、Office 365进行课後活动对英文学习动机、学习成效及同侪互动之影响。教育科学研究期刊，67(4)，1-34。
连结：
Anggeraini, Y.(2020).An investigation of the students opinion on the use of digital storytelling In learning English.ELT-Lectura,7(1),47-51.
Balaman, S.(2020).A study on the impacts of digital storytelling on EFL learners’ self-efficacy and attitudes toward education technologies.International Online Journal of Education and Teaching,7(1),289-311.

国际计量

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

文章公开取用时，将寄通知信至您填写的信箱地址