题名

臍帶自然乾燥對新生兒臍帶脫離時間成效-系統性文獻回顧暨統合分析

并列篇名

The Effect of Dry Care on the Time of Umbilical Cord Separation in Newborns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

DOI

10.6224/JN.202208_69(4).09

作者

謝伶瑜(Ling-Yu HSIEH);陳碧惠(Pi-Hui CHEN)

关键词

自然乾燥 ; 臍帶脫落時間 ; 酒精 ; chlorhexidine ; 母乳 ; dry care ; umbilical cord separation time ; alcohol ; chlorhexidine ; mother milk

期刊名称

護理雜誌

卷期/出版年月

69卷4期(2022 / 08 / 01)

页次

64 - 74

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

背景:臨床實務存有多種不同的臍帶護理方式,而世界衛生組織(World Health Organization)所建議的自然乾燥法,具簡便操作、低成本之優勢,而其對臍帶脫離時間或合併症之影響值得進一步探討。目的:整合隨機對照試驗以確認執行臍帶自然乾燥對新生兒臍帶脫離時間之成效,並探討臍帶相關不良事件發生情形。方法:於Cochrane、PubMed、Medline、CINAHL、Embase、華藝線上圖書館及臺灣博碩士論文網搜尋2021年12月前發表的中英文文獻。以Modified Jadad Scale作為篩選研究品質工具,並使用Review Manager 5.3版進行統合分析。結果:最終納入7篇皆為隨機對照試驗,共27,037位新生兒。臍帶護理措施包含自然乾燥、酒精或chlorhexidine(CHX)消毒、塗抹母乳或水楊酸糖粉(salicylic sugar powder, SSP)。統合分析結果顯示,採自然乾燥較酒精消毒有效縮短臍帶脫落時間(MD: -1.78 days, 95% CI [-2.4, -1.16], 3篇, n = 2,102),但與CHX消毒比較,無顯著差異(MD: -0.15 days, 95% CI [-1.99, 1.69], 2篇, n = 10,519);而塗抹母乳(MD: 1.19 days, 95% CI [0.82, 1.56], 3篇, n = 730)、SSP (MD: 4.9 days, 95% CI [3.71, 6.09], 1篇, n = 92)使臍帶較早脫落之成效優於自然乾燥。另與自然乾燥比較,CHX消毒顯著較少發生臍帶不良事件,而與酒精消毒、塗抹母乳或SSP無顯著差異。結論/實務應用:採自然乾燥縮短臍帶脫落時間成效顯著優於酒精消毒,且未增加臍帶炎發生,可優先做為臍帶護理之第一選擇,而塗抹母乳、塗抹SSP亦能加速臍帶分離且無不良影響,可作為臍帶護理之替代方案。

英文摘要

Background: There are many different approaches to umbilical cord care in clinical practice. Dry care is recommended by the WHO based on its ease of implementation and relatively low cost. However, the effect of dry care on the time of umbilical cord separation and related complications require further study. Purpose: The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effect of dry care on the time of umbilical cord separation and related adverse events in newborns. Methods: A literature search was conducted of articles published before December 2021 in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Embase, Airiti Library, and National Digital Library of Theses in Taiwan databases. The research quality of the identified articles was assessed using the Modified Jadad Scale. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager, version 5.3, with statistics reported as mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. Results: Seven randomized controlled trials covering a total of 27,037 newborns were identified for analysis. Umbilical cord care in these studies included the following approaches: dry care, alcohol, chlorhexidine (CHX), mother's milk, and salicylic sugar powder (SSP). The results of the meta-analysis showed that umbilical cord separation time was significantly lower for the dry care approach compared to the alcohol approach (MD: -1.78 days, 95% CI: -2.4 to -1.16, three studies, n = 2,102) but not significantly different than the CHX approach (MD: -0.15 days, 95% CI [-1.99, 1.69], two studies, n = 10,519). Notably, the umbilical cord separation time for both mother's milk (MD: 1.19 days, 95% CI [0.82, 1.56], three studies, n = 730) and SSP (MD: 4.9 days, 95% CI [3.71, 6.09], one study, n = 92) approaches were reported as significantly less than the dry care approach. In addition, the CHX approach was associated with significantly fewer cord-related adverse events, while the alcohol, mother's milk, and SSP approaches were associated with rates of cord-related adverse advents similar to dry care. Conclusion / Implications for Practice: Because using dry care for umbilical cord care shortens the cord separation time compared to the alcohol approach and does not increase the incidence of omphalitis, this approach should be the first choice for cord care. Both mother's milk and SSP approaches are also associated with shorter umbilical cord separation times without adverse effects, and may be used as alternatives to dry care in umbilical cord care.

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 預防保健與衛生學
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
参考文献
  1. 莊其穆(2011).臨床醫師如何閱讀統合分析(Meta-analysis)的論文.台灣醫界,54(2),74–82。[Chuang, C.-M. (2011). How clinicians read meta-analysis. Taiwan Medical Journal, 54(2), 74–82.] https://doi.org/10.30044/TMJ.201102.0003
    連結:
  2. 劉美芳、李慈音(2009).新生兒臍帶護理的迷思.護理雜誌,56(5),80–86。[Liu, M.-F., & Lee, T.-Y. (2009). Myth of neonatal umbilical cord care. The Journal of Nursing, 56(5), 80–86.] https://doi.org/10.6224/JN.56.5.80
    連結:
  3. Abbaszadeh, F., Hajizadeh, Z., & Jahangiri, M. (2016). Comparing the impact of topical application of human milk and chlorhexidine on cord separation time in newborns. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 32(1), 239–243. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.321.8223
    連結:
  4. Allam, N. A., AL Megrin, W. A., & Talat, A. M. (2015). The effect of topical application of mother milk on separation of umbilical cord for newborn babies. American Journal of Nursing Science, 4(5), 288–296. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20150405.16
    連結:
  5. Al-Shehri, H. (2019). The use of alcohol versus dry care for the umbilical cord in newborns: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies. Cureus, 11(7), Article e5103. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5103
    連結:
  6. Amiri-Farahani, L., Sharifi-Heris, Z., & Mojab, F. (2020). The anti-inflammatory properties of the topical application of human milk in dermal and optical diseases. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4578153
    連結:
  7. Dore, S., Buchan, D., Coulas, S., Hamber, L., Stewart, M., Cowan, D., & Jamieson, L. (1998). Alcohol versus natural drying for newborn cord care. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing: JOGNN, 27(6), 621–627. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.1998.tb02631.x
    連結:
  8. Gras-Le Guen, C., Caille, A., Launay, E., Boscher, C., Godon, N., Savagner, C., Descombes, E., Gremmo-Feger, G., Pladys, P., Saillant, D., Legrand, A., Caillon, J., Barbarot, S., Roze, J. C., & Giraudeau, B. (2017). Dry care versus antiseptics for umbilical cord care: A cluster randomized trial. Pediatrics, 139(1), Article e20161857. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1857
    連結:
  9. Imdad, A., Mullany, L. C., Baqui, A. H., El Arifeen, S., Tielsch, J. M., Khatry, S. K., Shah, R., Cousens, S., Black, R. E., & Bhutta, Z. A. (2013). The effect of umbilical cord cleansing with chlorhexidine on omphalitis and neonatal mortality in community settings in developing countries: A meta-analysis. BMC Public Health, 13(3, Suppl.), Article S15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-S3-S15
    連結:
  10. Kapellen, T. M., Gebauer, C. M., Brosteanu, O., Labitzke, B., Vogtmann, C., & Kiess, W. (2009). Higher rate of cord-related adverse events in neonates with dry umbilical cord care compared to chlorhexidine powder. Neonatology, 96(1), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1159/000200165
    連結:
  11. Kirk, A. H. P., Yang, J., Sim, W. C., Chia, L. Y. X., & Lau, Y. (2019). Systematic review of the effect of topical application of human breast milk on early umbilical cord separation. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing: JOGNN, 48(2), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2018.12.004
    連結:
  12. Liu, M.-F., Lee, T.-Y., Kuo, Y.-L., & Lien, M.-C. (2012). Comparative effects of using alcohol, natural drying, and salicylic sugar powder on umbilical stump detachment of neonates. The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing, 26(3), 269–274. https://doi.org/10.1097/JPN.0b013e318261ca33
    連結:
  13. López-Medina, M. D., López-Araque, A. B., Linares-Abad, M., & López-Medina, I. M. (2020). Umbilical cord separation time, predictors and healing complications in newborns with dry care. PLOS ONE, 15(1), Article e0227209. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227209
    連結:
  14. Mullany, L. C., Darmstadt, G. L., Khatry, S. K., LeClerq, S. C., Katz, J., & Tielsch, J. M. (2006). Impact of umbilical cord cleansing with 4.0% chlorhexidine on time to cord separation among newborns in southern Nepal: A cluster-randomized, community-based trial. Pediatrics, 118(5), 1864–1871. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-1091
    連結:
  15. Mullany, L. C., Shah, R., El Arifeen, S., Mannan, I., Winch, P. J., Hill, A., Darmstadt, G. L., & Baqui, A. H. (2013). Chlorhexidine cleansing of the umbilical cord and separation time: A cluster-randomized trial. Pediatrics, 131(4), 708–715. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-2951
    連結:
  16. Oremus, M., Wolfson, C., Perrault, A., Demers, L., Momoli, F., & Moride, Y. (2001). Interrater reliability of the modified Jadad quality scale for systematic reviews of Alzheimer’s disease drug trials. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 12(3), 232–236. https://doi.org/10.1159/000051263
    連結:
  17. Pezzati, M., Biagioli, E. C., Martelli, E., Gambi, B., Biagiotti, R., & Rubaltelli, F. F. (2002). Umbilical cord care: The effect of eight different cord-care regimens on cord separation time and other outcomes. Biology of the Neonate, 81(1), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1159/000047182
    連結:
  18. Pezzati, M., Rossi, S., Tronchin, M., Dani, C., Filippi, L., & Rubaltelli, F. F. (2003). Umbilical cord care in premature infants: The effect of two different cord-care regimens (salicylic sugar powder vs chlorhexidine) on cord separation time and other outcomes. Pediatrics, 112(4), Article e275. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.112.4.e275
    連結:
  19. Quattrin, R., Iacobucci, K., De Tina, A. L., Gallina, L., Pittini, C., & Brusaferro, S. (2016). 70% alcohol versus dry cord care in the umbilical cord care: A case-control study in Italy. Medicine, 95(14), Article e3207. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003207
    連結:
  20. Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638–641. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638
    連結:
  21. Sankar, M. J., Chandrasekaran, A., Ravindranath, A., Agarwal, R., & Paul, V. K. (2016). Umbilical cord cleansing with chlorhexidine in neonates: A systematic review. Journal of Perinatology, 36(1, Suppl.), S12–S20. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2016.28
    連結:
  22. Sinha, A., Sazawal, S., Pradhan, A., Ramji, S., & Opiyo, N. (2015). Chlorhexidine skin or cord care for prevention of mortality and infections in neonates. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007835.pub2
    連結:
  23. Stewart, D., Benitz, W., & Committee on Fetus and Newborn. (2016). Umbilical cord care in the newborn infant. Pediatrics, 138(3), Article e20162149. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-2149
    連結:
  24. 國民健康署孕產婦關懷中心(無日期).新生兒臍帶護理。2022年3月27日取自https://mammy.hpa.gov.tw/Home/NewsKBContent/346?type=01 [Maternity Care Center, Health Promotion Administration, Taiwan, ROC. (n.d.). Umbilical cord care in newborns. Retrieved March 27, 2022, from https://mammy.hpa.gov.tw/Home/NewsKBContent/346?type=01]
  25. Aghamohammadi, A., Zafari, M., & Moslemi, L. (2012). Comparing the effect of topical application of human milk and dry cord care on umbilical cord separation time in healthy newborn infants. Iranian Journal of Pediatrics, 22(2), 158–162.
  26. Golshan, M., & Hossein, N. (2013). Impact of ethanol, dry care and human milk on the time for umbilical cord separation. JPMA: The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 63(9), 1117–1119.
  27. Nourian, M., Allaii, F., & Heidari, A. (2009). Comparison of the effect of alcohol 70% versus dry cord care on cord bacterial colonization & cord separation time among newborns. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 25(1), 103–107.
  28. World Health Organization. (1998). Care of the umbilical cord: A review of the evidence. http://bvsper.paho.org/videosdigitales/matedu/ICATT-AIEPI/Data/Care%20of%20the%20umbilical%20cord/fd38a9b4-bfa1-4735-9a9a-e7dbb0faa720.pdf
  29. World Health Organization. (2013). WHO recommendations on postnatal care of the mother and newborn. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/97603/1/9789241506649_eng.pdf