門診護理人員溝通行為量表之發展與驗證

Development and Validation of the Outpatient Nurses Communication Behavior Inventory

10.6224/JN.202310_70(5).07

呂姍薇(Shan-Wei LU)；洪麗真(Li-Chen HUNG)；劉介宇(Chieh-Yu LIU)；黃筑榆(Chu-Yu HUANG)；鄭夙芬(Su-Fen CHENG)

溝通行為 ； 溝通行為量表 ； 驗證性分析 ； 門診護理人員 ； communication behaviors ； communication behavior inventory ； confirmatory factor analysis ； outpatient nurses

護理雜誌

70卷5期（2023 / 10 / 01）

44 - 53

繁體中文;英文

背景：門診是民眾最常的選擇就醫之處，然在醫學中心，由於看診人數多，護理人員需在短時間提供病人相關的診療資訊。所以良好的溝通是門診護理人員首重能力。然，現有溝通能力評估量表很少符合門診情境。目的：發展門診護理人員溝通行為量表，並測試信度與效度。方法：第一階段為文獻查證與統整，編擬溝通評量表。第二階段進行兩回合專家內容效度之檢定。第三階段於2018年12月至2019年1月，北台灣某醫學中心，採方便取樣方式，收案220名有執照門診護理人員填寫量表，進行量表建構效度及檢視量表內在一致性。結果：第一階段經由文獻查證統整出六個構面溝通模式，包括接觸、介紹、溝通、詢問、回答、離開，共25題。第二階段乃經兩回合專家效度後，維持六構面，但修改為21題，其題項內容效度指標（item-content validity index）與量表內容效度指標（scale-level content validity index）值均為1.0。第三階段則採用驗證性因素分析檢視建構效度，結果維持六大因素，總共16題。模式三顯示溝通量表呈現良好模型（goodness of fit;X^2 =155.75, p<.001, RMSEA=.06, GFI=.92, AGFI=.87, NNFI=.97, NFI=.95, Model AIC=253.75）。內部一致性Cronbach's α為.89。結論／實務應用：量表具有良好的信、效度，可用於評估門診護理人員溝通行為，亦可作為教學及評量依據。CICARE（connect, introduce, communicate, ask, respond and exit）六大構面可提醒門診護理人員隨時展現有效溝通，提升護病溝通行為，全面提升照護品質。

Background: Outpatient clinics in medical centers are the most common location where people seek medical treatment. Because they must provide patients with treatment information in a timely manner, good communication skills are a key competency for outpatient nurses. However, the tools available for communication behavior assessment are general and rarely tailored for outpatient settings. Purpose: The purpose was to develop a communication behavior inventory for outpatient nurses and to examine its reliability and validity. Methods: During phase one, the authors conducted a literature search and synthesis, using the findings to develop the Outpatient Nurses Communication Behavior Inventory. During phase two, two expert validation rounds were conducted to confirm content validity. During phase three, 220 licensed outpatient nurses were recruited from a medical center in northern Taiwan to complete the instrument (December 2018 – January 2019.) The construct validity and internal consistency of the inventory were evaluated. Results: The literature search and synthesis identified six domains of communication, including connect, introduce, communicate, ask, respond, and exit. A total of 25 items were generated. Following the two expert panel validation rounds, the six domains remained but the inventory items were reduced to 21. Both item-content validity index and scale-level content validity index were 1.0. In phase three, the results of the confirmatory factor analysis retained six factors with a total of 16 items. Model three showed that the inventory demonstrated goodness of fit (χ^2 = 155.75, p < .001, RMSEA = .06, GFI = .92, AGFI = .87, N NFI = .97, NFI = .95, Model AIC = 253.75). Internal consistency was demonstrated with a Cronbach's α of .89. Conclusion/ Implications for Practice: The Outpatient Nurses Communication Behavior Inventory exhibits good reliability and validity and may be used to assess outpatient nurses' communication behaviors and as a basis for education. The six CICARE (connect, introduce, communicate, ask, respond and exit) domains may be utilized to remind outpatient nurses to demonstrate effective communication consistently, promote outpatient nurses' communication with patients, and improve quality of care.

1. 王玉珍, Y.-C.,李宜玫, Y.-M.,吳清麟, C.-L.(2019)。青少年優勢力量表之發展研究。教育心理學報，50(3)，503-528。
   連結：
2. 王靜慧, J.-H.,郭鈴艷, L.-Y.,吳頌誼, S.-Y.,李皎華, C.-H.(2021)。利用情境模擬教學提升臨床人員溝通能力。護理雜誌，68(4)，64-71。
   連結：
3. 邱尚志, S.-J.,李佩珍, P.-C.,李麗惠, L.-H.,林寬佳, K.-C.(2020)。全民健保民眾就醫流程經驗與治療效果滿意度之相關：2012-2016年我國全民健保就醫權益調查為例。台灣公共衛生雜誌，39(3)，257-268。
   連結：
4. 郭芳秀, F.-H.,黃惠滿, H.-M.,孫凡軻, F.-K.,林婉如, W.-J.(2019)。加護病房護理人員人際溝通能力與衝突處理風格。護理雜誌，66(2)，67-76。
   連結：
5. 黃紀諺, C.-Y.,周盈邑, Y.-Y.,楊銘欽, M.-C.,董鈺琪, Y.-C.(2021)。台灣版慢性病照護評估問卷之發展與驗證。台灣公共衛生雜誌，40(3)，294-305。
   連結：
6. 蔡素慧, S.-H.,吳宗晉, T.-C.(2021)。門診護理人員工作滿意度、角色認同與離職傾向之探討。醫務管理期刊，22(4)，298-313。
   連結：
7. Chuang, C.-C.,Lee, C.-C.,Wang, L.-K.,Lin, B.-S.,Wu, W.-J.,Ho, C.-H.,Chen, J.-Y.(2017).An innovative non-pharmacological intervention combined with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia increased patient global improvement in pain and satisfaction after major surgery.Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment,13,1033-1042.
8. Coad, J.,Smith, J.,Pontin, D.,Gibson, F.(2018).Consult, negotiate, and involve: Evaluation of an advanced communication skills program for health care professionals.Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing,35(4),296-307.
9. Geng, J.,Liu, M.,Zhang, H.,Gao, J.,Wang, L.,Zhang, Y.,Ma, F.,Liu, Y.(2022).Application of the six-step standard communication process in the communication training for newly recruited nurses in cancer specialist hospitals.Frontiers in Surgery,9,842716.
10. Hu, H.,Zhang, A.,Wang, Z.(2022).Effect of CICARE communication mode on disease uncertainty, self-nursing ability, and quality of life in patients with coronary atherosclerotic heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention.Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
11. Lin, E. C.-L.,Chen, S.-L.,Chao, S.-Y.,Chen, Y.-C.(2013).Using standardized patient with immediate feedback and group discussion to teach interpersonal and communication skills to advanced practice nursing students.Nurse Education Today,33(6),677-683.
12. Lu, S.-W.,Huang, C.-Y.,Liu, C.-Y.,Huang, H.-M.,Cheng, S.-F.(2022).Effectiveness of a mobile technology-supported self-reflective course in communication behaviors for outpatient nurses.The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing,53(6),279-288.
13. Lynn, M. R.(1986).Determination and quantification of content validity.Nursing Research,35(6),382-385.
14. Mullan, B. A.,Kothe, E. J.(2010).Evaluating a nursing communication skills training course: The relationships between self-rated ability, satisfaction, and actual performance.Nurse Education in Practice,10(6),374-378.
15. Phillips, R. A.(Ed.)(2016).America’s healthcare transformation.Rutgers University Press.
16. Rubio, D. M.,Berg-Weger, M.,Tebb, S. S.,Lee, E. S.,Rauch, S.(2003).Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research.Social Work Research,27(2),94-104.
17. Sharma、 S.,呂金河（譯）, J.-H.(Trans.)(2005).多變量分析.滄海圖書=Ting Lung Book.
18. Shen, H.,Qian, X.(2020).The CICARE six-step communication improvement program in health education for patients with cerebral infarction.Chinese Journal of Integrative Nursing,6(2),129-131.
19. Shih, C.-I.,Weng, C.-C.,Chen, W.,Yang, H.-F.,Fan, S.-Y.(2021).Consideration factors of older adults seeking medical treatment at outpatient services in Taiwan.BMC Health Services Research,21(1),1216.
20. Skär, L.,Söderberg, S.(2018).Patients’ complaints regarding healthcare encounters and communication.Nursing Open,5(2),224-232.
21. Wang, X.,Du, C.,Wang, X.,Bian, L.(2021).Application research of CICARE communication mode in communication between nurses and patients of endocrinology intern nurses.International Journal of Frontiers in Medicine,3(3),16-21.
22. Wen, T.,Huang, B.,Mosley, V.,Afsar-Manesh, N.(2012).Promoting patient-centred care through trainee feedback: Assessing residents’ C-I-CARE (ARC) program.BMJ Quality & Safety,21(3),225-233.
23. 李延慧, Y.-H.(2013)。國立臺北護理健康大學=National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences。
24. 邱皓政, H.-J.(2011).結構方程模式－LISREL/SIMPLIS原理與應用.雙葉=Yeh Yeh Book Gallery.
25. 財團法人醫院評鑑暨醫療品質策進會=Joint Commission of Taiwan(2020).台灣病人安全通報系統2020年年報.
26. 陳靜紋, J.-W.,李安瑜, A.-Y.,方茂守, M.-S.(2018)。運用多元教學策略於精神科護理實習生之溝通成效初探。華醫學報，49，93-110。
27. 黃芳銘, F.-M.(2007).結構方程模式：理論與應用.五南圖書=Wu-Nan Book.
28. 黃雅萱, Y.-H.,謝素英, S.-I.,許麗齡, L.-L.(2014)。心肌梗塞情境模擬溝通課程對提升護理人員溝通能力成效之研究。護理雜誌，61(2)，33-43。
29. 衛生福利部（2020，12月）．108年度全民健康保險醫療統計年報(電子書)（第4頁）．衛生福利部統計處。[Min istry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan, ROC. (2020, December). 2019 National Health Insurance medical statistical annual report (e-book) (p. 4). Department of Statistics, Ministry of Health and Welfare.] https://www.mohw.gov.tw/dl-70641-33764b1d-b662-4c0c-b01a-e57bd6949084.html
30. 鍾焜明, K.-M.(2019)。國立臺南大學=National University of Tainan。