题名

Using Intellectual Property Rights to Protect Indigenous Cultures: Critique on the Recent Development in Taiwan

并列篇名

用智慧財產權來保護原住民文化:對臺灣最近的發展之批判

DOI

10.6152/jaa.2007.06.0008

作者

林開世(Kai-Shyh Lin)

关键词

智慧財產權 ; 臺灣原住民 ; 文化權 ; 傳統智慧創作 ; intellectual property rights ; indigenous peoples in Taiwan ; cultural rights ; traditional intellectual creation

期刊名称

考古人類學刊

卷期/出版年月

67期(2007 / 06 / 01)

页次

185 - 220

内容语文

英文

中文摘要

行政院原民會成立以後,臺灣的原住民運動的重心轉向如何在體制中爭取立法的保障與經費的分配。近年來,一個重要的進展就是朝向以各種特別法來保護原住民的文化。這篇文章以2007年通過的「原住民族傳統智慧創作保護條例」為例,一方面指出以智慧財產權的概念來作為這種文化保護用途的限制;另一方面指出這些法條對原住民文化性質的假設,往往過分理想化與化石化,忽略了原住民族群文化的互動與採藉,以及族群界限政治建構的歷史。最後,本文並指出這種立法的可能遭遇的實際限制與社會與文化後果。

英文摘要

After the establishment of the Council of Indigenous Affairs, the indigenous people's movement in Taiwan began to turn its attention to the problem of passing special legislations to advance and consolidate gains and benefits. One of the major developments in recent years was the use of intellectual property rights to protect and promote indigenous cultures. Examining the ”Protection Act for the Traditional Intellectual Creations of Indigenous Peoples” passed by the legislators in 2007, this article points out that even though the Act tries to circumvent limitations of current intellectual property right law, its basic assumptions about the nature of cultural tradition are too idealized and rigid to cope with the complexity of socio-cultural dynamics in Taiwan. The political construction of ethnic classification by various colonial regimes in the past and the flexible tradition of indigenous art and crafts in the present all challenge any attempt to erect hard boundaries among different ethnic cultures. Thus, this article argues that the Protection Act is not just unnecessary but could be detrimental to the vitality and creativity of indigenous cultures in contemporary Taiwan.

主题分类 人文學 > 歷史學
参考文献
  1. Allen, Robert C.(1983).Collective Invention.Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,4,1-24.
  2. Benhabib, Seyla(2002).The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
  3. Boggs, James P.(2004).The Culture Concept as Theory, in Context.Current Anthropology,45(2),187-209.
  4. Brightman, Robert(1995).Forget Culture: Replacement, Transcendence, Relexification.Cultural Anthropology,10(4),509-546.
  5. Brown, Michael F.(2003).Who Owns Native Culture?.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
  6. Brush, Stephen B.(1993).Indigenous Knowledge of Biological Resources and Intellectual Property Rights: The Role of Anthropology.American Anthropologist,95(3),653-686.
  7. Chang, Chung-hsin(1999)。原住民族智慧財產權之保護。智慧財產權,12,1-22。
  8. Chao, C. M.、Q. T. Tsai、H. F. Chou、M. Y. Shieh、K. N. Chang(2004)。智慧財產權入門。臺北=Taipei:元照=Yuanzhao。
  9. Chen, J.H(2001)。民俗智慧創作保護之研究。輔仁法學,22,251-347。
  10. Chen, Jwu-shang(2000)。看不見的權利:從民族主義、族群文化及殖民歷史反思臺灣原住民族財產權在國內法治中的發展。花蓮=Hualien:國立東華大學=National Dong Hwa University。
  11. Chiang, Kuan-ming(2003)。國立東華大學=National Dong Hwa University。
  12. Chou, Hsin-Yi(2005)。簡介傳統知識保護之立法例-以巴拿馬、巴西、秘魯為主。植根雜誌,21(1),15-40。
  13. Chu, Sheng-Chi(2003)。National Tainan Teachers College。
  14. Coombe, Rosemary J.(1998).Intellectual Property, Human Rights & Sovereignty: New Dilemmas in International Law Posed by the Recognition of Indigenous Knowledge and the Conservation of Biodiversity.Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies,6(1),59-115.
  15. Cowan, Jane K.,Marie-Bénédicte Dembour,Richard A. Wilson(2001).Culture and Rights: Anthropological Perspective.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  16. Greaves, Tom(1994).Intellectual Property Rights for Indigenous Peoples: A Sourcebook.Oklahoma City:Society for Applied Anthropology.
  17. Paper presented at a seminar of the Kennedy School
  18. Harrison, Simon(1999).Identity as a Scarce Resource.Social Anthropology,7(3),239-251.
  19. Hirsch, Eric,arilyn Strathern(2004).Transactions and Creations: Property Debates and the Stimulus of Melanesia.New York:Berghahn Books.
  20. Ho, De-fen(1999)。臺灣原住民文化財產權會議實錄。臺北=Taipei:臺灣原住民部落振興文教基金會。
  21. Hsu, Mei-chih(1992)。排灣族的琉璃珠。臺北=Taipei:稻鄉=Daoxiang。
  22. Huang Ying-kuei、Shih Tianfu(2001)。臺東縣史。臺東=Taitung:臺東縣政府=Taitung County Government。
  23. Huang, Chu-cheng(2005)。時間、勞動與生態-原住民族財產權的核心論題。清華科技法律與政策論叢,2(1),5-47。
  24. 原住民傳統智慧作之保護
  25. Kuei, Hung-cheng(2002)。國政分析內政(析)091-006號。臺北=Taipei:財團法人國家政策研究中心=National Policy Center。
  26. Kuo, W. H. J、Hsin-fu Yen、J. H. Chen、I. C. Hong(2005)。臺灣民族藥學知識及其保護。生物科技法的保護與生命倫理國際研討會
  27. Kuo, W. H. J、J. H. Chen、S. C. Chen、S. Y. Chou(2004)。傳統知識的特性及其保護的國際現狀。臺灣原住民族傳統醫療與生物倫理討論會
  28. Kuo, W. H. J、J. H. Chen、S. C. Chen、S. Y. Chou(2005)。傳統知識之保護初探。清華科技法律與政策論叢,2(1),49-100。
  29. Kuo, Warren H. J.,Jau-hwa Chen,Shih-chang Chen,Shin-yee Chou(2004).The Evolution of the IP-system, especially in Biotechnology-European and Asian Perspectives.Helsinki, Finland:Hanken School of Economics and Business Administration.
  30. Kymlicka, Will(2001).Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism, and Citizenship.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  31. Levin, R. C.,A. K. Klevorkick,R. R. Nelson,S. G. Winter(1987).Appropriating the Returns form Industrial Research and Development.Brookings Papers on Economic Activity,3,783-820.
  32. Lin, Bo-nian(2004)。論原住民族智慧權保障機制之建構-以「原住民族傳統智慧創作保護條例草案」為例之探討。原住民教育季刊,35,57-76。
  33. Lin, Chian-i(2002).National Taiwan University.
  34. Lin, Kai-shyh(2006)。誰決定我們是誰。科學人雜誌,4,140-145。
  35. May, Christopher(2000).A Global Political Economy of Intellectual Property Rights: The New Enclosures?.London:Routledge.
  36. Messer, Ellen(1993).Anthropology and Human Rights.Annual Review of Anthropology,22,221-249.
  37. Nadasdy, Paul(2002)."Property" and Aboriginal Land Claims in the Canadian Subarctic: Some Theoretical Considerations.American Anthropologist,104(1),247-261.
  38. Nieć, Halina(1998).Cultural Rights and Wrongs: A Collection of Essays in Commemoration of the 50th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.Paris:UNESCO.
  39. Posey, Darrell A.,Graham Dutfield(1996).Beyond Intellectual Property: Toward Traditional Resource Rights for Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities.Ottawa:International Development Research Centre.
  40. Pottage, Alain,Martha Mundy(2004).Law, Anthropology, and the Constitution of the Social: Making Persons and Things.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  41. Shieh, Ming-yan(1995)。智慧財產權之制度與實務。臺北=Taipei:翰蘆=Hanlu。
  42. 原住民族傳統生物多樣性知識保護法
  43. Thompson, Richard H.(1997).Ethnic Minorities and the Case for Collective Rights.American Anthropologist,99(4),786-798.
  44. Wilson, Richard Ashby(1997).Human Rights, Culture and Context: Anthropological Perspective.London:Pluto.
  45. Wilson, Richard Ashby,Jon P. Mitchell(2003).Human Rights in Global Perspective: Anthropological Studies of Rights, Claims and Entitlements.London:Routledge.
  46. Yúdice, George(2003).The Expediency of Culture: Uses of Culture in the Global Era.Durham:Duke University Press.
被引用次数
  1. 蔡侑霖(2020)。大學社區實踐在臺灣的實作初探:以Wulai地區的相關計畫為例。台灣社會研究季刊,116,1-52。
  2. 陳文德(2014)。文化產業與部落發展:以卑南族普悠瑪(南王)與卡地布(知本)為例。考古人類學刊,80,103-140。
  3. 郭佩宜(2008)。當地景遇到法律:試論所羅門群島土地的法律化及其困境。考古人類學刊,69,143-182。
  4. 洪淳琦(2021)。作為混雜性(Hybridity)的傳統:以Homi Bhabha的後殖民觀點論原住民族傳統智慧創作保護條例。臺大法學論叢,50(1),1-67。
  5. 鄭瑋寧(2010)。文化形式的商品化、「心」的工作和經濟治理:以魯凱人的香椿產銷為例。台灣社會學,19,107-146。