题名

台灣銀行業資本及風險之關係:利用分量迴歸分析

并列篇名

The Relationship between Capital and Risk in Taiwan Banking Industry: Quantile Regression Analysis

DOI

10.6504/JOM.2009.26.04.02

作者

賴奕豪(Yi-Hao Lai);許文彥(Wen-Yen Hsu)

关键词

資本比率 ; 資產風險 ; 二階段分量迴歸 ; Capital Ratios ; Portfolio Risk ; Two-Stage Quantile Regression

期刊名称

管理學報

卷期/出版年月

26卷4期(2009 / 08 / 01)

页次

377 - 389

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文以二階段最小平方法(2SLS)與二階段分量迴歸法(2SQR)分析台灣銀行業風險與資本間的關係。2SLS的實證結果發現,平均而言,銀行資本水準對目標風險水準決定無顯著影響,銀行風險水準正向影響目標資本水準。但是2SQR結果更深入發現,無論是中度與高度風險銀行或是中度與高度資本的銀行,其風險與資本均呈正相關,但是低度資本的銀行,風險上升並不會同步造成資本上升,換言之,低資本銀行的投資動機與其它同業有明顯的差異。其次,本文也將銀行依2SQR結果分為9類,發現各類銀行決定目標資本與風險水準的動機不盡相同,特別是低資本但高風險的公司,監理的壓力成為唯一的監督力量。

英文摘要

Prior literature examines the relationship between capital and risk of banking industry by using two-stage least squared regression (2SLS) and generates mixed results. However, we argue that 2SLS fails to capture the incentive effect that undercapitalized banks may have. Therefore, this study employs both 2SLS and two-stage quantile regression methods to analyze the relationship between banks’ capital and risk in Taiwan. The results of 2SLS suggest that the level of capital, on average, does not affect the level of target risk, and higher risk leads to higher capital. However, the results of 2SQR suggest that there exists a positive relationship between risk and capital for banks with medium and high level of risk and for banks with medium and high level of capital. Further, no significant relationship is found between risk and capital for low capitalized banks, suggesting that higher risk for low capitalized banks will not lead to higher capital and thus, the investment incentives for these banks differ from their peers.

主题分类 社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. Aggarwal, R.,K. Jacques(2001).The Impact of FDICIA and Prompt Corrective Action on Bank Capital and Risk: Estimates Using a Simultaneous Equations Model.Journal of Banking and Finance,25(6),1139-1160.
  2. Amemiya, T.(1982).Two Stage Least Absolute Deviations Estimators.Econometrica,50(3),689-711.
  3. Avery, R. B.,A. B. Berger(1991).Risk-Based Capital and Deposit Insurance Reform.Journal of Banking and Finance,15(4),847-874.
  4. Berger, A. N.(1995).The Relationship between Capital and Earning in Banking.Journal of Money, Credit and Banking,27(2),432-456.
  5. Blum, J.(1999).Do Capital Adequacy Requirements Reduce Risks in Banking?.Journal of Banking and Finance,23(5),755-771.
  6. Buser, S.,A. Chen,E. Kane(1981).Federal Deposit Insurance, Regulatory Policy, and Optimal Bank Capital.Journal of Finance,36(1),51-60.
  7. Cummins, J. D.,D. Sommer(1996).Capital and Risk in Property-Liability Insurance Markets.Journal of Banking and Finance,20(6),1069-1092.
  8. Cummins, J. D.,S. Harrington,G. Niehaus(1995).Risk-Based Capital Requirements for Property-Liability Insurers: A Financial Analysis.New York:New York University Salomon Center.
  9. Ediz, T.,I. Michael,W. Perraudin(1998).Bank Capital Dynamics and Regulatory Policy.New York:Bank of England, Mimeo.
  10. Fonseca, A. R.,Francisco Gonzalez(2008).Cross-Country Determinants of Bank Income Smoothing by Managing Loan-Loss Provision.Journal of Banking and Finance,32(2),217-228.
  11. Furlong, F. T.,M. C. Keeley(1989).Capital Regulation and Bank Risk-Taking: A Note.Journal of Banking and Finance,13(6),883-891.
  12. Working Paper
  13. Gujarati, D. N.(2003).Basic Econometrics.New York:McGraw-Hill.
  14. Jacques, K.,P. Nigro(1997).Risk-Based Capital, Portfolio Risk, and Bank Capital: A Simultaneous Equations Approach.Journal of Economics and Business,49(6),533-547.
  15. Jeitschko, T. D.,S. D. Jeung(2007).Do Well-Capitalized Banks Take More Risk? Evidence from the Korean Banking System.Journal of Banking Regulation,8(4),291-315.
  16. Keeley, M. C.,F. T. Furlong(1990).A Reexamination of Mean-Variance Analysis of Bank Capital Regulation.Journal of Banking and Finance,14(1),69-84.
  17. Kim, D.,A. M. Santomero(1988).Risk in Banking and Capital Regulation.Journal of Finance,35(5),1219-1233.
  18. Kim, T. H.,C. Muller(2004).Two-Stage Quantile Regression When The First Stage Is Based on Quantile Regression.Econometrics Journal,7(1),218-231.
  19. Leland, Hayne E.(1998).Agency Costs, Risk Management, and Capital Structure.Journal of Finance,53(4),1213-1243.
  20. Merton, R. C.(1977).An Analytic Derivation of the Cost of Deposit Insurance and Loan Guarantees.Journal of Banking and Finance,1(1),3-11.
  21. Myers, S. C.(1977).Determinants of Corporate Borrowing.Journal of financial Economics,5(2),147-175.
  22. Myers, S. C.,N. S. Majluf(1984).Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions when Firms Have Information that Investors Do Not Have.Journal of Financial Economics,13(2),187-221.
  23. Orgler, Y. E.,R. A. Taggart(1983).Implications of Corporate Capital Structure Theory for Banking Institutions.Journal of Money, Credit and Banking,15(2),212-221.
  24. Powell, J.(1983).The Asymptotic Normality of Two Stage Least Absolute Deviations Estimators.Econometrica,51(5),1569-1575.
  25. Rime, B.(2001).Capital Requirements and Bank Behaviour: Empirical Evidence for Switzerland.Journal of Banking and Finance,25(4),789-805.
  26. Saunders, A.,E. Strock,N. G. Travlos(1990).Ownership Structure, Deregulation, and Bank Risk Taking.Journal of Finance,45(2),643-654.
  27. Shrieves, R. E.,D. Dahl(1992).Relationship between Risk and Capital in Commercial Banks.Journal of Banking and Finance,16(2),439-457.
  28. 林景春(1996)。資本適足性之規定對台灣地區銀行風險影響之實證研究。台灣銀行季刊,47(3),1-34。
  29. 郭照榮(1997)。風險基礎的資本管制對台灣銀行業者投資組合行為之影響。管理學報,14(4),479-506。
  30. 黃介良、吳文彰(1995)。銀行獲利率、資產風險和資本比率關係之實證研究。基層金融,31,25-46。
被引用次数
  1. 藍尉倫、賴奕豪、許文彥(2007)。所有權結構與銀行的風險承擔。風險管理學報,9(3),255-273。
  2. (2015)。臺灣商業銀行流動性風險與經營績效關聯性再探討。臺灣銀行季刊,66(4),24-55。